(It's really not surprising coming from an activist judge.)How is he being an "activist judge" by issuing his opinion?
>"The decision by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
to accept an invitation from Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), the founder of the
House's Tea Party
Caucus, to speak to incoming House members about the Constitution is drawing
fire from some who worry the court is injecting itself into partisan
politics.The meeting "suggests an alliance between the conservative
members of the court and the conservative members of Congress," said Jonathan
Turley, a law professor at George
Washington University, who said Scalia had shown "exceedingly poor
>"Scalia speaks regularly at colleges and law schools as well as to conservative
legal groups such as the Federalist Society.Several experts in legal
ethics questioned whether a justice should speak to members of Congress if the
lawmakers were identified with just one party."<
***nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."****
Wow, I didn't know I wasn't a "person" just because I was a woman.