Wow...even some Democrats realize that Obama is a complete failure and is hurting the country.
"Here's the conversation again:
"Nope, there weren't opinions in that link. There were facts, so it's not surprising that you couldn't refute them."
LOL...okay if you say so.
Oh...and enough with the personal attacks already.
Oh my...how things get twisted and go off on tangents here.
I thought you said that Caddell hasn't been a democrat for a while....since the late 80's.
<>Yes, that's what I said.<>I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion based on what I said. << I miscalculated the time i THOUGHT he was a dem. (close to 30 years). >>Okay.<< I did not realize that he was a democrat initially then changed to something else in the 80's (is he a republican? I don't know) That being said, the article didn't call him a democrat...I believe they said a "one-time democratic pollster". Not the same thing as calling him a democrat.>>I never said that the article said he was a Democrat. You said he was a Democrat which is why I corrected that misconception in the first place. <Yes, that is what I was saying/that's okay. <>I didn't realize being matter-of-fact was considered "aggressive."<>You are correct and I apologize. I will just continue to post matter-of-factly without extraneous comments added on.
Haha....they write as "patriots and Democrats"....think they meant to say "hypocrites".
He also denounced Democrats in the House who voted against the Palm Sunday Compromise, which sought to reinstate Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, as "cold blooded," and called environmentalism "a conspiracy 'to basically deconstruct capitalism.'" Caddell is a regular guest on Fox News Channel, listed as a Fox News Contributor. This has earned him the label of "Fox News Democrat."
Yeah....a real Democrat, sheesh!
They may be right that Obama will have to run a negative campaign, but in his next term with dems taking both the House and Senate, he will be perfectly able to govern.
"They may be right that Obama will have to run a negative campaign,..."
Well, he certainly can't run on his record, now can he?
<<"They may be right that Obama will have to run a negative campaign,..."
Well, he certainly can't run on his record, now can he?>>
Actually, I was thinking more about the falsehoods being spread about Obama by all the GOP primary candidates during their campaigns thus far.