Cause/effect relationship?
Find a Conversation
| Wed, 06-16-2004 - 4:54pm |
Okay, There was a thread a while back in which the majority of women said that their SO/DH/BF only lasted about 3-5 minutes during intercourse. I've also heard this confirmed by research, though I can't quote the source( maybe Masters and Johnson????).
Then , of course, we all know the statistic that only about 30% of women orgasm from intercourse.
Now, it seems like to me that there might be some kind of cause/effect relationship here, especially since it seems the majority of women require more than 5 minutes of stimulation to orgasm.
Now, many of you will remember my thread on orgasm from intercourse a while back and how a major argument broke out over how much men cared about this and how much they pressured their partners. I was always of the opinion that if the man wanted his woman to orgasm during intercourse, HE was the one to do something about it: stimulating her in other ways first, exploring different positions and movements to maximize clitoral and g-spot stimulation, and most of all, trying to keep it up long enough to get her there.
So, what do you guys think?

Pages
bump
Obviously, since you orgasm in under 5 minutes or not at all, anything more would be boring to you. However, I'm sure it has not escaped your notice that very few women respond the way you do. I happen to be a man who finds fellatio to completion to be tedious and boring. Thanks to your thread of a while back here and on GUY TALK and some threads I've read on askmen, I know I'm not the only man like this ( and I really appreciate knowing that, thanks). However, I know that guys like me are really a small minority since so many men seem to place such a high value on BJs. So, I just stay out of those discussions and recognize that I'm different from the vast majority of men on this topic.
taoist
Pages