Cut or Uncut penis?
Find a Conversation
| Fri, 05-12-2006 - 12:42am |
Hi All,
I m curious to know opinion about cut and uncut penis.I m uncut.Here is my opinion
About uncut penis:
1)what i feel is man can sence more pleasure with uncut penis than cut while thrusting as forskin is most sensitive part in penis.I can feel that forskin is most sensitive while masturbating and having sex.There may not be any change in intensity of pleasure while ejaculating.
2)I also feel women may feel her vagina full with uncut penis as there will be extra skin(fore skin retracted) which acts like extra padding.
3)It acts like protection for the head
4)Keep sensitiveness of head and inner skin of foreskin.
5)Also prevents head go too dry and loss it is color(i see that head becomes bit dark when it is too much exposed,rubbing to cloths).
6)Uncut penis may not last long initially.But it will perform better over time.
7)Some may feel hard to retract their fore skin.So it may difficult to clean easily
8)It may be bit irritating while putting condom as condom got stuck between base of head and retracted skin.
About cut penis:
1)May last long in initial days of sex also as their head would have lost sensitive and there is no foreskin
2)Easy to clean.
3)It may look better.some women may feel uncut penis looks like elephant trunk.Fore skin hanging over head as cut penis look like arrow head.In erected state there may not be much difference lookwise
4)Easy to put condoms.
5)No issue of retracting fore skin.
what is ur opinion ?Women from which u get more pleasure?Which is ur preference?

Pages
"2)I also feel women may feel her vagina full with uncut penis as there will be extra skin(fore skin retracted) which acts like extra padding."
Er, not really lol. I can assure you, once a penis is inside a woman's vagina she can't feel whether it's circumcised or not.
"what is ur opinion ?Women from which u get more pleasure?Which is ur preference?"
Foreskin doesn't effect my pleasure one way or another. Looks wise, I suppose an uncircumcised penis does look oddly like an elephants trunk but it really doesn't matter to me because I don't get anymore pleasure either way.
On the other hand, my sexuality aside, I feel it's a little cruel to circumcise babies when they don't even have the choice. It is said that uncircumcised men enjoy sex more and if thats true, then I feel bad for the men who have had it removed without their permission. I guess you can't really miss what you never experienced but even if it's not true, I just don't understand why anyone would want to do that to their child. Personally, I don't think it should be legal for anyone else to decide whether a boy loses his foreskin or not. It's done when the child is first born so they can't object but hypothetically speaking, what would happen if his parents suddenly decided for some reason that they wanted him circumcised at age 10 or older? What if he then objected? Would any doctor perform it? And if not, why is it ok to do it when he's a baby but not when he's old enough to object?
Genealogical Musings
It doesn't matter to me and I have no preference.
I was only with one man for a few months who as uncut. I was very young and didn't really remember "taking note" on the difference during intercourse because I simply never thought there might be any. Anyhow, neither here nor there, it wouldn't matter either way--whatever that man has, is what I'll have. He can't change what he has, so I accept all that he is. No matter it's size, shape, curve or whether it's cut or uncut, etc...it's all good! ;-)
And as an aside, if I had sons, I wouldn't have had them cut if I had the choice.
Edited 5/12/2006 4:30 pm ET by rain_dancer_iam
I can assure you that when it comes to intercourse, there is no difference between a cut and an uncut penis. An uncut penis does not *fill* the vagina up more. Other than the visual, for a woman they are both the same.
I have heard other women comment that the uncut penis looks strange, smells due to bacteria collecting under foreskin during the course of the day, ect... Personally I don't feel this way. My ex was uncut, while my hubby is cut. I have no preference at all.
"I have heard other women comment that the uncut penis looks strange, smells due to bacteria collecting under foreskin during the course of the day, ect..."
Actually, it's not much different than a woman's natural scent as the folds of her vulva are continually moist. If he cleans himself regularly, it shouldn't be a problem, just as if a woman showers, it shouldn't be. I just think that if you compare a "dry" cut penis, to an uncut penis, of course, you're going to have more natural scent, because there are secretions presents, as opposed to none. The scent, is the same scent of a woman. If the woman doesn't clean herself, she will continually become more "pungent"(sorry to be graphic, but trying to make a point). I just can't imagine what the vulva would be like without any moisture.....less scent? Sure....but, I'd imagine it'd be a dry, shvriveled up, rougher place.
And as far as "looks strange" do you think that vulvas don't?
I can't imagine a man saying "Vulvas look strange and they smell because they're moist...I sure wish a woman didn't have any moisture there, and that they would get cut so that the vulva looks nicer."
Pages