Cut or Uncut penis?

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-04-2004
Cut or Uncut penis?
17
Fri, 05-12-2006 - 12:42am

Hi All,

I m curious to know opinion about cut and uncut penis.I m uncut.Here is my opinion

About uncut penis:

1)what i feel is man can sence more pleasure with uncut penis than cut while thrusting as forskin is most sensitive part in penis.I can feel that forskin is most sensitive while masturbating and having sex.There may not be any change in intensity of pleasure while ejaculating.

2)I also feel women may feel her vagina full with uncut penis as there will be extra skin(fore skin retracted) which acts like extra padding.

3)It acts like protection for the head

4)Keep sensitiveness of head and inner skin of foreskin.

5)Also prevents head go too dry and loss it is color(i see that head becomes bit dark when it is too much exposed,rubbing to cloths).

6)Uncut penis may not last long initially.But it will perform better over time.

7)Some may feel hard to retract their fore skin.So it may difficult to clean easily

8)It may be bit irritating while putting condom as condom got stuck between base of head and retracted skin.

About cut penis:

1)May last long in initial days of sex also as their head would have lost sensitive and there is no foreskin

2)Easy to clean.

3)It may look better.some women may feel uncut penis looks like elephant trunk.Fore skin hanging over head as cut penis look like arrow head.In erected state there may not be much difference lookwise

4)Easy to put condoms.

5)No issue of retracting fore skin.

what is ur opinion ?Women from which u get more pleasure?Which is ur preference?

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-26-2004
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 11:24am

That would bring us to a five year old. Maybe in twenty years, they might feel differently. On other boards, I've heard men who had no choice but to get circumcised because their foreskin was defective, and they said that they definitely felt a difference over time. I think that this is something that should definitely be studied in depth. The only men who can participate, are those who have been cut when they were old enough to notice the difference, since most men spend their whole lives either one way, or the other.

You can't imagine the head of your penis being more sensitive? You're right. How could you imagine anything that you have never experienced.

My clitoris is extremely sensitive. In fact, I cannot have it touched directly ever by hands. It requires the foreskin or else it's just too painful. I suppose if my foreskin was cut as an infant, I would never have known the difference; I suppose I would have found some way to masturbate; I suppose that there would be some "toughening" of the skin over the course of years and years of exposure and loss of sensitivity because of it....and never would I know the difference.

Imagination is more important than knowledge." (Albert Einstein )
iVillage Member
Registered: 12-20-2004
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 1:10pm

You can't imagine the head of your penis being more sensitive? You're right. How could you imagine anything that you have never experienced.

My point there is, it is plenty sensitive enough, I wouldnt want it to be any more sensitive.Any more would be painful, and I would want that why?

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-26-2004
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 3:11pm

You mean that uncut men experience pain and not pleasure? I never heard that.

As I said, my clitoris is painful to direct touch, but that doesn't mean that I would want it to be any less sensitive. That intense sensitivity is there for a purpose, as is the clitoral hood. It may not be able to withstand direct contact, but that doesn't mean that its' extra sensitivity doesn't create better pleasure, as does the nerves within the clitoral hood and shaft themselves. I'm sure that if I was circumcized at birth, that I wouldn't know any different, and it would still be somewhat sensitive--enough to give pleasure. But that still doesn't mean it will be equal to the pleasure obtained with a decreased sensitivity clitoris. You have never had a foreskin, there are nerve endings within the foreskin itself, and your penis is likedly to be somewhat desensitized, so you can't know what you're missing, that's all I'm saying.

Maybe some of the circumcised men can step up and let us know if they are so sensitive that they feel pain when touched.




Edited 5/13/2006 3:13 pm ET by rain_dancer_iam
Imagination is more important than knowledge." (Albert Einstein )
iVillage Member
Registered: 12-20-2004
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 4:06pm
your penis is likedly to be somewhat desensitized, so you can't know what you're missing, that's all I'm saying.
And all I`m saying is if it were anymore sensitive it would be too sensitive.....
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-18-2001
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 4:46pm

It's a funny argument. As far as I can tell it goes like this: Uncut guys say that they're more sensitive and the foreskin itself is sensitive too, and therefore cut guys are mutilated and missing a natural part of themselves. Cut guys say they wouldn't want to be more sensitive and clearly aren't missing anything. Therefore, the debate seems to go, uncut guys must cum faster because of that claimed extra sensitivity (the implication being that uncut guys must be incompetant lovers) and they are smelly, and unclean to boot. The cut guys, apparently, can last longer, are cleaner and are better lovers. No wonder everyone gets fired up about the whole issue.

I figure that there must be something to the senstivity issue. Any other part of the human body becomes somewhat desensitised to touch or friction if it is exposed to it every day. Why would the head of the penis be any different? There's got to be *some* relative loss of sensation! Who knows to what degree that is though? And I know that my foreskin has sensation and sometimes just that alone can be pleasurable - so if you don't have a foreskin there is definitely got to be a loss of sensation.

As for cleanlinest etc? Well, I guess it's like learning to wash you hair. Cleaning under a foreskin isn't exactly a difficult thing to do and like washing your hair, it's a learnt behaviour. If you've got an unclean foreskin then your going to have other hygiene issues too.

Does it look funny? I suppose anything looks funny if you haven't seen a lot of them. As I said in my previous post, most young ladies in this country are going to think that a cut penis is a strange thing as less than 5% of boys have been circumsized in recent years here.

I don't know. One side can't imagine what they don't have, the other side can't truly know what it's like without it.

Back to the op's question, my partner has no real preference. She likes mine because it's attached to me, and once it's in she likes it just fine and wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

BTW, you talk about girth. The Doctor's don't scalp the shaft when circumsizing so there should be little or no difference in girth.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-26-2004
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 4:52pm
Shoot, Hump, you're making me envious now that I wasn't circumcised as a wee babe! To think that I could have a less sensitive clitoris--imagine the things I could do with it. ;-)
Imagination is more important than knowledge." (Albert Einstein )
iVillage Member
Registered: 12-20-2004
Sat, 05-13-2006 - 5:04pm
I can only imagine ..;)

Pages