hand size and penis size..any correlatio
Find a Conversation
hand size and penis size..any correlatio
| Mon, 01-16-2006 - 11:57pm |
Is it true that the size of a man's and can determine the size of his penis?
| Mon, 01-16-2006 - 11:57pm |
Pages
Eveybody answers "no" here, without any backup for their somehow 'acquired knowledge'(?), except the one poster that backed up a "yes" with a study.
Sizesurvey ran a study of height, feet, and hands, and after over 3500 respondants there was a clear correlation in height, a small correlation with hands, and a very small correlation with feet. I noticed one poster in this thread did back up her "no" with someone she knows (may have been her huddy, I don't recall for sure)that doesn't correlate with his penis size, and then said "so no there is no correlation". Correlations aren't determined by one example or a few examples. In fact, there can be a correlation even if it usually doesn't indicate anything.
In other words, if one out of every 4 guys that are 5'8" tall have a 7" penis or longer, and one out of every 2 guys 6'2" tall has a 7" penis or longer, then that is a correlation. It's not a strong correlation, but it isn't a weak one either. Yes, it would be a 50-50 chance by that the tall guy has or has not 7">, so it's not an absolute, but the word correlation definitely applies, as it's a 50% for the tall guy vs a 25% chance for the shorter guy.
Yes, sizesurvey was an internet poll, and yes, it is bound to not be exact. Yet if you look at the increments from shortest height to tallest height (they broke it up inch by inch) the penis size average moves upward in a smooth curve line (if it was on a graph) as height moves upward. While the average penis size can be argued against, since it was an online survey, that doesn't have anything to do with the correlation curve that clearly, neatly, shows there. That didn't happen by chance. At a forum I'm a member of, we've ran our own separate height vs penis size poll, and also a shoe size vs penis size poll, and with over 1000 repondants in the height poll the correlation is obvious. These are guys that know how to measure accurately and are serious in the forum. Just like at sizesurvey, the height to penis size correlation is moderate to above moderate, and a feet to penis size correlation is there, but not as strong as the height, just like at sizesurvey. Both sites, ours and theirs, show similiar results. That didn't happen by chance either. Anybody that understands math knows the odds of a smooth upward correlation curve by pure chance at one forum would be extremely high, and then the almost same thing happening at a separate forum, is virtually impossible. Many of the guys at the forum I belong to don't believe there can be a correlation, and pretty much refuse to address the results of the polls. The biggest surprise for me has been how penis size vs height, hands, or feet ranks up there with conservative views vs liberal views and God exists vs god doesn't exist views. In other words, many people make their minds up from what seems to be a predisposed bias, and stick with that opinion no matter what evidence comes up. Only a few are willing to remain truely open minded enough to seriously consider evidence that warrants attention, to be objective. The subject of penis size vs height or feet or hands seems to be a personal subject for some reason, as people don't budge in their views. It's surprising. All those posting "no" here I'm certain will continue to firmly believe it's a no, and these surveys won't change that. I can honestly say that I was prepared to accept the verdict of our forums survey, no matter what the result. Not many can make that claim, as it turns out.
Stating that hand size, foot size, height or anything else has any correlation to penis size....is the same as saying all African American men have huge penises, or all Oriental men have tiny penises. It's a "generalization", nothing more. If 3500 men with big penises have big hands, I'm sure there are millions of men with big hands that DO NOT have a big penis. I'm also sure that any survey that asks for information on penis size will be skewed, simply because most men will "overestimate" themselves, at least men who are concerned with "averages".
There are African American men with small penises, and Oriental men with large penises, just as there are Caucasian men of both varieties.
If any female makes her judgement on hand size, if she avoids a man with small hands, and eagerly chases after a man with large hands, there's a 50% chance she is going to be VERY disappointed.
I've been with more guys than a lot of women here and I can tell you without a doubt: There's no correlation between height and penis size at all.
Where as size might not matter to most women, it DOES matter to guys so I've paid very close attention :)
If I found that connection to be true, then I wouldn't hesitate to say so. On this board or off. Why wouldn't I?
But what does one appendage have to do with another? LOL! What if a man has large feet but small hands? Or visa versa? Is it a toss up? I've seen that particular situation many times.
I've also heard that men with big noses have big penises. Based on the same "logic" it seems.
I know I'm going to regret getting involved in this thread.
First of all, saying that there is a CORRELATION in height, hands and feetis not the same as sayiong ALL African American men have huge penises or ALL Oriental men have tiny penises. Correlations don't depend on "all". In my example, (my attempt to head off posts such as yours that don't understand what a correlation is) of 6'2" men and 5'8", I didn't say all. It was a 25% difference (50% -25%). A correlation is a reciprocal relation between two or more things. It doesn't have to be absolute, as in "all".
Also, as I also tried to head off in my first post, to no avail, yes some men overestimate themselves and that would make for an argumment against the average size being right at sizesurvey. But as I pointed out in that post, that argument doesn't explain the smooth upward progressive curve in height and penis size in the large surveys. Also, I mentioned that the forum (not sizesurvey) I belong to the guys know very well how to measure (it's a penis forum, so that part you said about not measuring correctly doesn't even come in play with that forum's polls. You ignored that completely, of course.
You didn't address my post, the points I made. You illogically brought up the average being off, even after I pointed out that doesn't explain the correlation, and even after I explained my forum are experts at measuring. You only posted the same ole "no".
Yes, there are short men with big penises and and tall men with small ones. What does that have to do with whether there is a correlation or not? I don't expect you to change your mind, but good grief.
cerryl and kat,
The survey at my forum is 1000 men, and at sizesurvey it's 3500 men. It's more miss than hit, but the correlation is there.
Pages