hand size and penis size..any correlatio

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-27-2003
hand size and penis size..any correlatio
57
Mon, 01-16-2006 - 11:57pm
Is it true that the size of a man's and can determine the size of his penis?
Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 12:21pm

Does it really matter whether I believe it or not? LOL!

We ARE talking about inches here and while an inch apparently seems to be majorly important to men, it isn't to most women. But in the long run, none of this really matters and it's only slightly interesting.

If you say that there seems to be some sort of correlation, then I'd be willing to take your word for it. Seeing that you've done so much extensive research and all. LOL!

I will forever amend my answer to this question to "not in my opinion, but some independant research seems to point to some correlation." How's that?

Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 12:23pm
; )
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2005
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 12:24pm
I'd say that a major step for mankind. Really. Thank you.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2005
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 12:31pm

typo I wrote "that" insterad of "that's".

Should read, "I'd say that's a major step for mankind". Of course I'm playing about the importance, but seriously, this seems to be a stubborn topic. It was no surprise that all but one poster said no in this thread. Not because this forum has a strong pc leaning, but because most people automatically are convinced it can't be possible. Notice they post simple "no" with no backing, or almost no backing, or simply throw up illogic that doesn't even apply. It's a curious thing, really. I didn't know what to think, and let my forum's poll decide it for me.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-26-2004
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 12:31pm
In my experience, there is some relativity. It's not so much their height, or shoe size, or even hand size per say, but the actual shape, width and length of the fingers(even color)--more the bone structure, I guess. My husband's hands are a VERY good indicator of his penis size almost to the tee, so was my first boyfriend's. Another man I had been with had thin, shorter, pale fingers, and that's exactly how his penis was. I think that it makes sense that there's some correlaton. Because my husband is quite thick and long. He has a very particular way of masturbating where he positions his four fingers on an angle just in the exact position to cover most of his shaft. If he had small, thin fingers, it just wouldn't "cover" most of it. ;-) This is just my experience, though--doesn't make it fact.
Imagination is more important than knowledge." (Albert Einstein )
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2005
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 1:03pm

Well, going with my orignal (for accurate relativity to the topic) personal measurements, I'm 6'0" tall, without shoes on, and had a 6.25" long penis by 4 3/4" girth at the base and 4.5 mid shaft point. Non bone pressed it was about 5.5" length, back when I only had a 3/4" pubic fatpad. (I need to explain why I said my "original" measurements. I do penis enlargement exercises. They DO work - grrrr. Nowdays I have a 1.1" pubic fatpad. I've gained weight, I'm about 20 pounds overweight, but actually look better with the extra weight :). Since I'm now about 7 3/8" long bone pressed I'm about 6.25 long non bone pressed, and 5" girth, but enough about that, back to the topic. Just felt the need to make mention that smaller size was originally, lol.)

Anyway, 5.5 L non bone pressed x 4.75 girth was quite average. Yet I'm some above average in height. So as you see, I don't fit the correlation in height. However, I do fit your finger post about thickness. I don't know if what you said really correlates any to penis GIRTH, I haven't seen any good charts on that (but size survey did do a hand size study to penis length and found some correlation, and there was a medical study that studied fingers and linked one of the fingers to penis length), but my fingers are sort of on the slender side, just like my penis was. I realise not many women look at hands to try and judge penis size, but some do, as I'm seen and overheard them do it with me many times. I could tell about a couple of embarrassing times conerning that, but I'll skip it. It's off topic anyway, and besides, nowadays that doesn't happen anymore since I have a good flaccid bulge, having gained much more so far in flaccid size than I have in erect from penis enlargement.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-27-2003
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 1:04pm
Ha..it's all rather funny but interesting. Well, my new man's hands are slightly small but average. His penis is smaller but I am sure average. His testicles are HUGE. He is a caucasian man. Most of my lover's have been black/Caribbean men and their hands were larger as were their penis's.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2005
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 1:55pm

anahidrose,

Hey, your post reminds me of a black comedian on BET (black entertainment television) that said when he was in the army it freaked him out at first to see those low hanging balls and turtled flaccid dicks on white guys, as he had only been around black guys up until that time.

Does your new man know about your previous bigger lovers? Some men don't ask, and or don't think about it, and then some men do let it bother them some if the other guy(s) were bigger. Does it matter to you. Do me a favor and tell it like it is. Don't sugar coat it a bit. I've studied this topic much, and have no interest whatsoever in you replying with any sugar coating. It's very important to me that I have the facts. While there are women that don't care about size, like Tish and Kat, there are those that do. I would like to know your viewpoint. Having had many large lovers, does it really not make any difference to you to go to a small/average size?

Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 3:18pm

No, I don't think people allow others to think for them OR deny something if they know it's true simply to be PC on a message board. Whatsmore, it's insulting and presumptuous to imply that!

Most of us are adults here and could care less if our personal thoughts and opinions are in line with others. Again, what would be the point on an anonymous message board? Who cares?

And I've been the single dissenting opinion many more times than I can count on this particular board! LOL! Doesn't bother me in the least.

I think you may be somewhat prejudiced in that you have chosen to believe that this survey is infallible and many of us just don't put much stock in surveys, period.

In any case, what does it matter? Really? A man has what he has, what difference does knowing this information make?




Edited 2/23/2006 3:55 pm ET by katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2005
Thu, 02-23-2006 - 3:49pm

I know what correlation means. Break it down. CO-relationship. One thing "depending" on another. i.e.: He has a big penis, therefore he must have big hands/feet.

According to Webster: Correlate, v.i. To have a mutual relation. - v.t. To place in or to bring into mutual relation. - a. Mutually related. - n. Either of two related things, esp. when one implies the other.

Correlation, n. Mutual relation of two or more things or parts; the act of correlating.