hand size and penis size..any correlatio
Find a Conversation
hand size and penis size..any correlatio
| Mon, 01-16-2006 - 11:57pm |
Is it true that the size of a man's and can determine the size of his penis?
| Mon, 01-16-2006 - 11:57pm |
Pages
dakine wrote "I know what correlation means..." "...He has a big penis therefore he must have big hands/feet."
Nope. It doesn't mean that if he has a penis penis he must have big hands/feet. It means he has merely has to have an 'increased chance', not that he necessarily must. A correlation can be a weak one, or a mild one, or a moderate one, or a strong one. The height correlation is a moderate one. The hands correlation is a mild one. The feet correlation is a milder one.
kat,
It matters that folks are posting "no" without anything substantial to go on. To me it matters in any subject, a subject of important or not, that folks at least try to validate their info. At least I have more to go on than ya do, much more in comparison.
Gawd, I need to proof read my own typing.
I wrote "It means he has merely has to have...".
I meant "It means he merely has to have...".
I also wrote "... a subject of important or not...".
I meant "...a subject of importance or not...".
Been-there. I didn't mean to imply that the girth or length of the fingers indicates actual size of the penis, just an overall indicator in relativity. In other words, a man who has thinner, shorter fingers as compared to a man who has thicker, longer fingers. The relative area(length, width, and girth of the fingers themselves from one man to another. I once heard that you can tell the length of a man's penis by measuring from the tip of his thumb to the bottom of the base of the wrist. Looking at my husband's thumb/wrist ratio and the overall look and size of his fingers, I would say that it's quite an accurate size indicator.
BTW, size doesn't matter to me either, but it's purely curiousity about "things" I've heard over the years. I like to know if the "myths" I've heard have any truth to them.
You can say that until you're blue in the face but you're still incorrect in your assumptions. It's not like this is a new question or theory, it's been examined/reexamined and examined some more by sources and experts that go far beyond the conjecture you're offering to this forum and the verdict is ALWAYS the same, No correlation. Besides, about EVERY woman or gay/bi male will say the same thing, with data gathered from their own EYES AND HANDS.
You're just stirring the forum up, nothing more.
Why should we 'believe' any of this. You're doing nothing more than stirring up the forum with a set of so-called statistics gathered from a so-called set of people on a site that's nothing more than a two-bit blog put together by the penis obsessed.
Really, if you wish to continue arguing this point into the ground as you've been doing, put something up from THE MEDICAL community. Of course, should you decide to cite such sources you'll only come up with the results that hospitals, universities and more 'credible' studies have already suggested 101 times in the last 30+ years:
No correlation :)
Forget your so-called survey for a second: How many penises have you actually had in your hands?
So you can just toss out the experiences of women and men (I have handled at least 2-3 dozen and as I guy, I PAY close attention to them, hehe) who have actually handled them and point us to an internet poll (don't forget 4 out of 5 penises on the internet are 8" and above *snicker*) and expect us to lend credence to your OPINION?
I for one, thank you for the entertainment.
So, does that mean we don't get to hear how many penises you've actually seen?
It's not believing what I will, it's believing what I see. So, what have *YOU* seen?
:)
Edited 2/24/2006 5:59 pm ET by katmandoo2001
Pages