Increase Volume of Ejaculate?

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-14-2004
Increase Volume of Ejaculate?
38
Tue, 07-20-2004 - 7:05pm
Hi! I have been lurking on the board for some time now, reading, taking things in, and taking notes, lol. I have a question though.

Does anyone know of any ways to increase the amount of male ejaculate?

Thanks in advance,

luvyourlife

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2003
Thu, 07-22-2004 - 3:24pm
I said "tablespoons" not "gallons".

As far as bigger testicles and more sperm:

10. Larger testicles contain more sperm than smaller testicles?

Yes, and this is because they contain more channels required for the production of the sperm. The principle according to which the capacity determines the quantity applies here as well.

From here:

http://sivasakti.com/articles/man/virility-art62.html



iVillage Member
Registered: 05-18-2004
Thu, 07-22-2004 - 3:31pm
That talks about sperm, not semen. There are millions of sperm in semen, they are microscopic. You could have several million more sperm and not notice an increase in the amount of ejaculate.

Leticia

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-14-2004
Thu, 07-22-2004 - 3:36pm
Damn! LOL You beat me to it! (I was going to say the same thing)
Image hosting by Photobucket
Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Thu, 07-22-2004 - 4:17pm
Maybe in REAL life but you were talking about porn, where I know that drenching, minutes-long facials are a big draw.

I think I've already made my point on the subject but whether the guy has cannonballs or peas in his pants, it makes no difference. The PROSTATE, where semen is produced, is a small organ incapable of holding more than a teaspoon or two of liquid to transport sperm from the testicles.

But IF you want to believe that Peter North can spew gallons of semen, that's your perogative...I won't burst your bubble.

iVillage Member
Registered: 12-29-2003
Thu, 07-22-2004 - 5:23pm
These folks who believe what they see in porn flicks probably think the actors who played hobbits in the "Lord of the Rings" movies are really only 3 1/2 feet tall.
Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Thu, 07-22-2004 - 6:58pm
You're right! But it's obvious they forget that porn is a BUSINESS and since facials seem to be the "hot" commodity right now, so they tell me, then that director providing the most outrageous ones will sell the most videos, etc. And DO what's necessary to bring in that audience and cash. And THAT's what it's all about folks.


Edited 7/23/2004 12:27 pm ET ET by katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2003
Fri, 07-23-2004 - 12:44pm
Once again, I never said gallons, I said TABLESPOONS.

Several posters have said how MUCH their SO's produce and I've also seen looping and Peter North and it's not looping in his case. He MAY be at an extreme end of what's "normal" or perhaps not. I'd be interested in how MUCH those posters who have said how much their SO's have produced have produced. (How much wood could a woodchuck chuck...) So far, the people who have pooh-pooh'ed the whole thing haven't actually seen Peter North but choose to educate me that porn is fantasy -- thanks, I knew that. Never saw the Rodney guy someone mentioned. Yes, I know sperm are microscopic, thank you, however surely some fluid volume balance is maintained to preserve the motility of the sperm so unless someone KNOWS differently, it would stand to reason that if the sperm count goes up significantly then overall volume may go up as well, albeit perhaps not a lot. As far as orgasm and ejaculation, argue about it all you want but most guys I've talked to say (or think, thank you) they're the same or close enough.

I'll bet several years ago a discussion regarding FE would have elicited much the same type of responses. I find it hard to believe that everything there is to know about human sexuality, behavior and performance has been learned.

Just some friendly discussion here, I didn't expect to be lectured about reality vs. porn. Thank you.

Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 07-23-2004 - 4:54pm
It wasn't a lecture but you're the one who brought up Peter North as an example of a man who could control the amount of ejaculate he produced. I simply disagreed with that possibility and explained why. But sorry, tablespoons of ejaculate don't take minutes to squirt and that's what you see in porn.

Once again though, it's individual choice to believe the possibility of conscious control over the amount of one's ejaculate and to actually produce significantly more than normal. I don't buy it myself.


Edited 7/23/2004 10:47 pm ET ET by katmandoo2001

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-30-2004
Sat, 07-24-2004 - 2:09am
Interesting debate. But after reading this thread I surfed the web and I certainly think Peter North's are real. They take about 15 seconds. It's on the edge of believability, but there's nothing I see that is the least bit dubious as to authenticity. Actually it's pretty hot how he (sometimes) gets these innocent little girls ... they really seem pretty adorable, certainly not like porno stars ...
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-23-2003
Sat, 07-24-2004 - 11:59am
I don't think the amount of ejactulate has any bearing on how long the orgasm lasts or how intense it is. A guy will ejactulate without even having an orgasm if there is to much of a build up. Conversely when his orgasm is finished he will stop contracting and the seman will stop squirting. The lenght of time his orgasm last has nothing to do with the amount of semen he has.

Jim