Ladies- Do your friends know his size???
Find a Conversation
| Thu, 09-21-2006 - 6:21pm |
Hi Everyone.. Ok before you start replying that this is just another post about penis size... well ok it is but in a different way.. we all know many (if not most) of us guys are size focused much to the confusion or amusement of you ladies.
But we also know that when the girls get together, more info and juicy detail gets discussed than you might otherwise lead on. Other boards here would confirm that one!
So my question is.. When talking with your girlfriends, Do you ladies talk or tell each other about your man's size, whether positively or negatively. Or in more of a general way, have you talked about the notable ones in your past you miss or ones that you just encountered?
Then the follow-up question is that have you ever increased the size more than it really was for the fun of the story?
Basically.. I want an inside view into how much the girl talk really involves size discussion (even if you would make the claim that Size doesn't matter to you!!)
This is open to all you ladies, younger or older, married or single. It doesn't have to be a recent discussion.. just any type of this discussion in your experience.
Look forward to reading the responses.
Curiousniceguy.

Pages
I don't agree with everything you're saying. I do agree that men care because women care, but that involves ego at times. For some men it's about mainly wanting to please her the best she can be pleased, for other men it's mainly about his ego, and for other men it's a combination of the two in fairly equal porportion.
I'm not aware of any polls to determine how often women talk about their SO or ex sizes. I just know it happens. Just how often, I don't know. If a poll was done on that, I wonder if it would show a correlation with the percentage results found in favorite penis size polls? In other words, since there are about 12% size queens (choose over 8" and put importance on big), would the results be that about 12% of women will quickly talk with others about their SO or one night stand's penis size, and the majority of the rest of the women only talk about it on occasion (in comparison to the women who choose a size preference but don't put importance on it). And the remaining women never or rarely talk about it with friends (in comparison to women who choose that size makes no difference whatsoever).
I'm not saying a correlation between the two polls would or would not be found. I'm saying it would be interesting to compare the results. If the results were a close match even that wouldn't mean for sure it's a connection, but it certainly would give reason to believe it's likely. On the other hand, the results could show no connection at all, or imply that it was in error to think that perhaps the dots could even be connected to begin with.
Or perhaps a mild to moderate correlation would exist. Without studies, it tough to say, but it wouldn't surprise me if the polls turned out to be linked in results. For instance, this is just a few examples, I realise that, but notice how several of the ladies on this forum who express that they would never discuss their SO's penis size with others are also the ones that vote size makes no difference whatsoever.
I really hate to use the word 'correlation' as I have above. It has been obvious to me for quite some time that many people don't really understand the word. So I hate to even bring the word up, but it best describes what I'm considering. Correlation doesn't mean an exact match. It just means an increased chance of a match. This reminds me of the height vs penis size thread at IVillage quite a while back. Someone asked if their was a connection between penis size and height, and the answers were "No" post after post...
They posted that tall guys can have small penises and short guys can have long penises and " therefore no correlation". Clearly showing they don't understand what correlation means. Correlation can range from a mild one to a moderate one to a strong one. It's not an all or nothing.
So in that thread I posted about an internet poll of over 3500 respondants. I also posted about a forum I belong to that is very reliable and has over 1000 respondants to it's own poll on the subject. Both polls showed a moderate correlation. I also posted how that just because someone says "in my experience there is no correlation" doesn't mean much. Reason being that a small sampling can turn up skewed results. But also because, as I pointed out but was ignored on this point, how I had studied the poll at my other forum and was able to see why it would be difficult for one to ascertain a correlation from experience (unless the correlation was a strong one instead of a moderate one). For instance, 6'2" and taller guys showed a result of 50% having 7" and longer penises. 5'8" and shorter in height guys showed 25% having 7" and longer penises. That's a 25% difference. That's a mild correlation between height and penis length. However, there were many more guys that were 5'8" and shorter that voted, than there were tall guys, and as a result there were actually more shorter guys with 7" and longer penises than were taller guys with 7" and longer penises. So a correlation exists, for 1 out of every 2 tall guys have 7" and longer while 1 out of 4 guys that are 5'8" and shorter have 7" and longer penises, and yet there are more shorter guys with 7+" penises.
(If those penis length sizes seem high to you, you're not wrong. It's because these measurements are done bone pressed. In other words, we press into the pubic fatpad to the pubic bone in order to get accurate measurements. Non bone pressed measurements depends on fatpad thickness - which can range from 1/4" to over 1 1/2 ". Also weight changes can affect measurements. So we press to the pubic bone, and measure on top of the penis. Most doctor studies measure non bone pressed. Those are penis size measurement studies, not to be confused with height vs penis size studies, which I pointed out, there are hardly any studies of.)
One poster in that thread said there are tons of mainstream studies showing no correlation. The poster didn't supply the studies, of course. No one challenged the poster. No one asked for the tons of "studies". Tons of studies don't exist. There have been a couple of very small studies, one of 30 men, and one of 100 men, and both concluded that there was a small correlation in the average. Funny thing is, the news media took those studies and headlined there was no correlation, with brief articles of no substance and changed wording to suit the reporter's whim. Actually, the poll at the forum I'm referring to that is very credible only showed about 1/4" difference in the average penis length between tall and short guys. So that really isn't much of a difference, in the average.
I really question why I typed all the above, because even though I'm presenting much more than opinion and I'm clearing showing why "experience" can give wrong impressions about correlations unless the correlation is strong instead of moderate or mild. I'm quite sure it will fly clean over heads. What's a person to do to convince anyone of anything.
Pages