Missionary vs. Cowgirl....

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-01-2004
Missionary vs. Cowgirl....
46
Thu, 06-03-2004 - 7:20pm
Which is better and why?


i prefer Missionary. Or guy on top i should say. to me the term missionary sounds dull. Why did they even name it that? Anyways. although I do like riding my guy, I get alot more excitment when he is on top. When you're in missionary, you can either make slow passionate love, or you can have some hard and fast rough sex. i like it when my guy puts my legs up over his shoulders. the feeling is so deep. there is this other thing I love. Basically you start missionary and while he is in you, you close your legs and have him straddle you. He then just grinds real hard against your clitoris area. Circles, side to side, It is amazing. Oh yueah and Ishytish, I love your comments, and you seem to know alot. Could you please enlighten us on some new missionary variations?

Avatar for imblushing
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 8:31am

Everyone IS aware that cosmogall has a lot of "gall", and has been posting this same or similar post ALL OVER THE iVillage boards!


Almost selling and promoting her view on missionary.


Sharon

A friend is the person who kn

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2004
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 9:35am
G-spot stimulation can be maximized in "missionary" position by simply moving parallel to one another, rather than perpandicular. keeping your pelvic bones together as much as possible, and rubbing together. The higher you keeps her legs, obviously, the more stimulation of the G-Spot. It can be awkward at first, but once you see the reaction, it is worth the practice to learn. Personally I like her to be on top. I like having my hands free to roam across her body freely. But then again, I like the power that being on top brings. Pinning her shoulders down, or grasping her hands above her head. Holding her hands as I rub, or grind into her. The different possibilities from "missionary" are limited only by your imagination, and of course basic anatomy. Same thing goes for "CowGirl". Both are great fun, but her being in control is my preference.
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2004
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 10:07am
Greeny has the ticket here. Christians never needed a reason to call it sinful. They just did, and anything other than the missionary position was sinful. Even today, devout christians still practice that, along with the whole birth control thing. Using birth control in any form is also forbidden to them. The "christian" extremeists of old believed that anything other than there belief, was a sin, and since "missionary has been around since the dawn of time, that was the only position that was not sinful. Yes, other positions were used throughout time, but not within higher, "civilized" societies that conformed to the religious right!
Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 11:44am
Just because someone may be "selling" something, though, doesn't mean anyone will be buying. LOL! When it comes to sex, it's a buyer's market, isn't it?

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-13-2003
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 11:49am
"Even today, devout christians still practice that, along with the whole birth control thing. Using birth control in any form is also forbidden to them."

I think you're confusing Catholicism with Christianity. They are not mutually exclusive. Trust me, I was baptized in a Southern Baptist Church (considered by some to be the most "devout" branch of Christians) and these beliefs were not held. I've been to many different churches (Baptist, Lutheran, etc) in several different states. The above is NOT true in the churches I've been to. I've never met a single *non-Catholic* Christian who believes what you say they do. Heck, when I was in high school I went to a Church camp. One of the guest speakers discussed sex. His position (pardon the pun) is that while sex is meant exclusively for married couples, that God intended it to be pleasureable and that its okay to have fun with it in your relationship.

I'm not trying to turn this into a religious debate. But its like if I said something to the effect of "Non Christians believe that beastiality is okay." I'm sure there are *some* non Christians that feel that way ... heck, I'm sure there are *some* Christians that feel that way. But to make that statement comes across as a condemnation of most Non Christians. Again, I don't want this to turn into a religious debate. I'm just correcting your overstatement.

Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 12:14pm
Hmmm, I'm a devout Christian and none of that is true about me. LOL!

Careful there Jeep, your Anti-Christian feelings are becoming a little too evident and this isn't the time or place for THAT discussion.

As a long time devout Christian myself, I know that what you stated is a gross exaggeration. As nuclover mentioned, you seem to be confusing old Catholicism with all Christianity. But frankly, I don't know too many Catholics today who adhere to everything you mentioned concerning sex. And just because one is a Christian, doesn't mean that one stops thinking and reasoning for oneself.

You would probably be very surprised to learn that more Christian couples own sex toys, etc. than other couples and are encouraged to be adventurous and free in their marital relationship.

Sure, there will always be people who are radical,rigid and vocal in their beliefs, that's nothing new, but you can't generalize a whole vast religion because of one faction.


Edited 6/8/2004 12:15 pm ET ET by katmandoo2001

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-23-2004
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 12:44pm

<>


bounxh0a-1.gif picture by dillbyrd

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2004
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 2:42pm
Anti Christian feeling??? I don't particularly care for any organized religion. Why??? More sin are committed in this world in the name of religion, than anything else!!!!! More blood is and has been spilled in the name of religion. The biggest oxymoron on the planet is something that catholics, Jews, muslums, buddhists, etc, etc. etc have participated in since the dawn of time. Religious WAR!!!!!!

I apologize if I offended you, but the fact remains. Christianity has been one of the biggest let downs of our civilization. The pope gets fat and happy, living in a castle, while there are those who starve to death. The churches are laiden with gold, and the priest wear expensive clothing, and there are those who have nothing. People die everyday in this world over what??? Religion. So, there are my issues. Sorry, I know this is not the time or place but I wanted you to see where I am coming from.

Now on another note. Wasn't it the Episcopalians who made a gay man a bishop?? Isn't that a SIN as far as the BIBLE is concerned. Oh. I am ranting now. Sorry yall. I will leave this one alone from now on. But, Kat, you know well enough how I am and if you would like to e-mail this issue, I am more than happy to debate it.

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-18-2004
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 2:46pm
>>The pope gets fat and happy, living in a castle, while there are those who starve to death.<<

Uhhh that's Catholicism again, isn't it?

Leticia

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2004
Tue, 06-08-2004 - 2:48pm
The pope pretty much covers all the bases. But yes it is the roman catholic church.