Missionary vs. Cowgirl....
Find a Conversation
| Thu, 06-03-2004 - 7:20pm |
i prefer Missionary. Or guy on top i should say. to me the term missionary sounds dull. Why did they even name it that? Anyways. although I do like riding my guy, I get alot more excitment when he is on top. When you're in missionary, you can either make slow passionate love, or you can have some hard and fast rough sex. i like it when my guy puts my legs up over his shoulders. the feeling is so deep. there is this other thing I love. Basically you start missionary and while he is in you, you close your legs and have him straddle you. He then just grinds real hard against your clitoris area. Circles, side to side, It is amazing. Oh yueah and Ishytish, I love your comments, and you seem to know alot. Could you please enlighten us on some new missionary variations?

Pages
Leticia
There are HUGE fundamental differences. And if you don't know the difference, perhaps you shouldn't be condemming Christians. That's how things like racism come about, ignorance.
Leticia
First, Christianity is actually a belief in Jesus as the son of God who was sent to Earth to die for our sins and accepting him as your savior. The original Christian church broke apart into Catholics and Protestants. The Catholics are those who stayed with the orignal church. Protestants are the group that broke away. Baptists, Lutherans, etc. are basically just Protestants called by a different name. While Catholicism is a branch of Christianity, it's not Christianity in itself now. They have many beliefs that differ from other Christians.
I'm sure not all Catholics believe the same thing, so I'm only using the Catholics *I personally know* as an example. But here are a few differences. Catholics pray to Saints and Mary, while other Christians pray directly to God/Jesus (the trinity is a confusing subject so I'll leave it at that). Catholics ask forgiveness through a priest, whereas Christians ask God directly. There are books in the Catholic bible that aren't in the bible used by non-Catholic Christians. These are books that were later added and are more tradition-based than philosophy based. Catholics believe you have to be baptized in the Catholic church to get to heaven. Whereas other Christians believe all that is required is accepting Christ as your savior. The Pope is the authority according to Catholics. The Bible is the authority to other Christians.
Now, I don't clame to know a lot about Catholicism. And some of my assumptions could be wrong. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I am. Again, while Catholics are Christians, Christians aren't necessarily Catholics, so attributing Catholic beliefs to Christians is incorrect.
And "religious wars" are not fought because of religious convictions, they're fought in the GUISE of religion. Wars are fought because of politics, greed and racial hatred.
No human being is without fault though, Christian or otherwise. So, while you've chosen to fixate on all the negative done in the name of religion, I could name many, many other ways that mankind has benefitted. And particularly in my own life. It's a choice though, isn't it, seeing the glass half full or half empty?
However, I won't waste time debating religion with someone who is so anti-Christian, what would be the point?
"A mind that is changed against it's will, is of the same opinion still."
Edited 6/8/2004 5:11 pm ET ET by katmandoo2001
i agree with the people who said they are different and one isn't better than the other. when i'm on the bottom i tend to feel more vulnerable. when i'm on top i feel more powerful and playful. both positions can offer excellent stimulation with slight modification.
just to add to the historical discussion, i heard kissing originated from the mother/child relationship, where the mother would chew up the food and pass it on to the child's mouth.
Check out this website to open your eyes about Christian sex:
http://www.themarriagebed.com/frequency.shtml
And BTW, if you're worried about Taoism being an "organized religion" , relax. It's more of a spiritual tradition and philosophy. More of a unorganized religion. One of the famous fundamental quotes from the Tao Te Ching is:
"The Tao that can be named is not the great Tao".
taoist
<>
Jeep, when you ask what the difference is between Catholics and Christians, then right THERE is the problem. Do you always place judgement upon something you clearly don't understand yet? Usually that question implies Catholics and Protestants, but that doesn't matter. Keep in mind that its believers like US who literally make up those organizations you "have a problem with." Let me know what you yourself label a man who judge's something/someone he does not fully understand. If you're not one of us, then...
Anyway, I thought I read that one of you posters out there said that those Christians treated sex as procreation only...NOT true and TOTALLY unBiblical, especially since the Bible had taught so much about the love in marriage. The extremists that I read about were teaching that the marriage bed is undefiled so long as it did not break the Bible's rules...and it did NOT say so long as it didn't break their own made up rules. It specifically stated undefiled just to make sure there was no confusion about it, outside of the specific rules that were actually stated, such as sodomy and adultery, etc. Please keep in mind that the GENUINE Christians were always careful to not take away or add to what the Bible had already deemed as acceptable or no. In fact, you'll discover that the heavier studies all along were upon Paul's epistles simply because Paul had dealt so many times with those who disfigured the truth to fit what they themselves believed compared to the Bible's actual words. YES it wasn't that uncommon for these same discussions to take place throughtout the rest of Christian history, including the realm of 'married' sex.
Remember, alcohol was considered a "sin" as well, but it was the "abuse" of it that was the actual sin, and NOT the alcohol itself. In fact, same goes for what we today call "money" and all. Those who did NOT understand the Bible and took on their own beliefs about it were the very ones who confused the issue.
I stress again that the discouragement from different positions was discouragement of the actual sins that they led to, such as doggy being turned into sodomy, and NOT a discouragement from the pleasure that God literally COMMANDED the married couple to enjoy. YES the emphasis on intimacy was indicated, but it was NOT the "rule" to follow, RATHER, it was an "encouragement" meant to highlight intimacy to prevent less intimacy, but it did NOT stress that other positions were "sin." Saying that Christians as a whole pressured and forced that all other positions were considered flat out sin is just NOT true.
I'm going to risk being deleted here and direct to a sight called Christian Research Institute. Please note that this is for research should any have further inquiries.
In the meantime, getting back to the core of this string, Mrs. Para loves the control I have during missionary as well as the contact, she loves the rough stuff during doggy, but her favorite is still her on top because of 'her' control of everything, including face to face and how fast and hard and deep and the angles and she actually finds it to be among the most comfortable for her--which most women don't.
C H A R A C T E R
Pages