Once you go big ... can you go back?
Find a Conversation
| Tue, 10-18-2005 - 2:28pm |
This question involves intercourse. For the most part, I've never been in a situation where I could have intercourse with a man who was very large (say well more than 8 inches). But I've heard stories from a few girlfriends and other posts here, that speak of an experience where they've never slept with a very big guy. However, then they do, and if they can take them in, sex with smaller men is never the same.
So my question is, once a woman is able to take a very large guy in, is there no way she can get that intense feeling from intercourse with a smaller man?
Are the women who have an intense experience with bigger men, who subsequently can't get the same experience again with smaller men, girls with large vaginas?
Are Kegels the key to sucess in taking in a smaller man?
***Please, no soap boxing or attacks, or size doesn't matter speeches if you don't have experiences that answer the questions. ****
I specifically want to hear from women that have gone from small/average, to BIG (enjoyed), then went back to small/average and enjoyed that too (intercourse wise).

Pages
I can pull up more surveys if necessary, but really would rather not. I'm a chart studier. It's how I can get beyond not just my own opinions, but also the opinions of others. I will admit I do also rely on anecdotal at times, if it seems to be overwhelming AND mostly coming from truthful sources. It's still a judgement call in anecdotal cases, for even though I may deem it worthy (or not), some one else will see it differently.
One thing I have found out is that charts don't usually change made up minds. For instance, at another forum there is a height vs penis size survey going on. It's a reliable serious survey btw, as only members can vote, and can only vote once. So far over a long period of time, it's gathered in 800 votes now. Guys post their pre pe penis size and along with it their height. It shows a correlation, but those with their minds made up ignore that thread, won't post into it where the numbers lay in full view, and continue to state in other threads that height and penis size correlation is insigificant. Actually, if it was a medical study looking at the results for a new drug it would receive a 'significant' from the medical community.
I've studied many charts in detail, and while it's true the odds are against a woman having had 8" or longer (I assume this is what you mean by "very large"), the odds aren't nearly as high as one would think. I can dig up the data, but I'll summerize and just say that when factoring in: the percentage of guys 8" and longer, the average number of men women have sex with, and not forgetting to include that big guys in general have sex with twice as many women (something people never take into account), then the odds are not nearly as high as it would seem.
In fact, while most guys choose to have the opinion that the vast majority of women are lying about having been with a big size, as it does seem that just about every woman that has been with at least a few men will claim so, my studies have shown me women are telling the truth. It must not be forgotten that many women will be thinking also of girth, and not necessarily just length, when saying a guy was big. Also, 7" on up is long to many women, and the general term "big" will include that group.
So to figure out if women are usually being truthful, the factors to add together are:
percentage of guys 7" length and longer, percentage of guys 5.5" girth and thicker, and that overall those guys tend to get around twice as much; and also how many guys she's been with. I can tell you when it's all put together it becomes nearly 100% that a woman who has been with just a few men will have met either 7>" length, or 5.5>"girth, or someone who had both the girth and length. Guys are quick to disbelieve, without taking into everything into account. It's a defense mechanism. they will analyze other things in like in great detail, but when it comes to whether or not women are getting big dicked, many guys don't look very far at trying to discover if it is so or not.
Well, your assumption is that all women are telling the truth in these studies though and I'm saying that at least half in any given study probably aren't. I used to be in market research years ago and I know that most people won't give truthful answers, particularly when the study is about something so personal as one's sexual experience. And after examining the real details of their lives, you see that their answers simply don't match up to their reality.
And whether guys "look very far at trying to discover if women are getting big dicked or not", what difference does it make? LOL! If a man is 5" and his partner has been with a 9" man, what difference does it make to him? He can't change his size and she obviously has decided that a 9" penis isn't quite as important as she thought or she wouldn't be there. So, why should men delve deeper into the possibility?
I'm sorry but there are just too many more important aspects to sexuality than penis size for this to be such a major concern for men. Or women. If a man cares about his partner's pleasure and acts on it, then his 5" is going to be more than sufficient for the majority of women.
Edited 11/1/2005 6:27 pm ET by katmandoo2001
No, I just don't believe everything I read. Depends on who is funding and more importantly, WHY a survey is being funded! Makes no difference to me personally. I'm not a size queen. But you can make surveys prove whatever you want to, just by how the question is phrased. Everyone knows that.
Edited 11/1/2005 10:21 pm ET by katmandoo2001
I have a friend who grew up with me (female)She got her life off track years ago and became a hooker...She has been with hundreds of men, and she said by and large that most men she had been with were around 5 1/2 inches. She measured by wraping her fists around the guys penis ,one stacked on top of the other (like holding a baseball bat)..She said that very few men had a long enough penis, so that the head of their penis stuck out from her fists...She figured that her two fists together were just under 6". Yes she saw a few really big ones, and her share of small ones, but most were under 6". Thickness was all over the charts according to her. Most were ave. to thin however, with a few memorable thick ones.
Im guessing , a woman who is used to a thin 5" comes across a 6" girth with 7" length, she would probably think it was huge.
Yes, it was a forum where the strippers were discussing size, but they were discussing it in a thread and that thread was also a poll thread. At the top of that thread was a poll where they could vote. Many chose to also discuss it also by posting into the thread. I can locate it and link it it I must.
Also, since you are a believer of size doesn't matter, then that causes you to assume they always over estimate. I don't doubt over estimation happens, but why can't it also be under estimation at times also. You give the example of her having been with smaller and then the next guy seeming bigger than he really his. Ok, but you only give one half of the picture (naturally the half that fits to backup your viewpoint women are bringing up exaggerated bigger sizes in posts. What about when she has been with above average and switches to smaller? I've heard of average size guys thought of as small size by women that had ben with bigger. Your bias causes you to only consider and present one half of the picture.
This is the sort of thing I was speaking of when I told Kat that guys who normally are very good at delving in great detail into subjects, when it comes to penis size their good minds won't let them. She said why should they. Well, why shouldn't one try to be accurate in what they state, if they are going to state about it. She also said those two charts can't be believed. There are other charts also, but I don't think she cares if there were 100 charts, she would never give in a bit. I'm not going to try and claim that I don't battle with bias myself, but unlike many people (I'm typing about people in general and not just speaking about you folks, as this is something I've noticed is widespread everywhere,)I attempt to bring in objectivity. If the numerous charts, and anecdotal word combined were saying something else then I would take it seriously. I'm an open minded person, not perfect about it, but at least I try to be.
Pages