penis bulge

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
penis bulge
41
Sun, 07-23-2006 - 12:33am
It doesn't matter, but this is something I've been wandering about....I've heard that you can't tell the size of a man's penis by his feet and hands. But can you, by looking at his bulge through his pants, tell how big he really is during the important stuff?
I've only been with my husband. He does'nt really have a big bulge, and when soft he looks to be small (about cocktail weeny size I guess, maybe a little bigger). When he gets fully erect, he appears a little over average (from what I've heard).
So my question stands, if you see a man with a big bulge, does that mean he is well over average size when erect?
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-18-2004
In reply to: charmasak
Tue, 07-25-2006 - 6:56am
Well, the young man I was seeing is well-endowed. I could see the bulge in his pants when he got hard after kissing me, and then I asked him to show it to me, and yep, it was nice and big.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2005
In reply to: charmasak
Tue, 07-25-2006 - 9:25am

I guess that would be great if size actually mattered! Size doesn't equate "talent" between the sheets! I've actually found it to be the opposite. The "average" guys usually know that it's not what you've got, but what you do with it.

And whatever size "he" has, it's doubtful if you'll ever find out if he knows what to do with it.

Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
In reply to: charmasak
Tue, 07-25-2006 - 11:17am
Yes. Most of us can see a noticable bulge in a man's pants "when he gets hard" though. We're talking about in the flaccid state.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-20-2004
In reply to: charmasak
Wed, 07-26-2006 - 11:18am
If you've taken the time to write a post about it, then it matters to you. It may not be the first item on your list, but it matters.
iVillage Member
Registered: 12-20-2004
In reply to: charmasak
Wed, 07-26-2006 - 7:09pm
One thing no one has mentioned.. That bulge or package also may include his balls.. they do not just always hang inbetween his legs, if they did they would get squished by his thighs..lol
Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
In reply to: charmasak
Thu, 07-27-2006 - 9:14am
Very true, hump. And having that bulk behind the penis can actually be deceiving.


Edited 7/27/2006 9:35 am ET by katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
In reply to: charmasak
Fri, 07-28-2006 - 12:23am
as a matter of FACT, it DOES NOT matter to me!!!! it ISN'T something that i sit around thinking or fantazing about and it DOESN'T effect my relationship with my husband. i have just, through the years, been curious! curiosity is the ONLY reason i posted, and since this is a great place to have questions answered i decided to find out!!
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2005
In reply to: charmasak
Sat, 07-29-2006 - 8:52am

kat wrote > Yes, Dakine, I believe I've heard about that tribe as well. But as you said, it's doubtful that a penis stretched to that degree would function anymore, as all the vessels, etc. would have been destroyed in the process. So, as we have long suspected, it's about competing with other men rather than a desire to please women. Might as well strap a long, wet noodle to your leg. <

They lose function, but it's because they don't use proper technique. They improperly tie onto the dick like a noose, then improperly leave it on for too long - it's a wonder it doesn't die and rot off (maybe some do). The picture mentioned has been studied and is strongly believed to be photoshopped. From bits and pieces of info, it appears this improper hanging is indded being done, but not by all that many. The tribe(s) would cease to exist.

It's not just about competition on the forum. Men on the forum give several reasons for Peing. Competition, to please women, to wow women, some guys state they are simply there for themselves - to enhance their bodies, some are there just to enhance their erections. Or any combination above, varying from guy to guy. Proper pe tends to enhance erections, not the other way around. It's very seldom, but when someone reports their erections are worse it's almost always discovered they are far overdoing the number of exercises or/and not giving their penises time to adjust before before they move up to more advanced methods. I've been PEing for years, though not as consistently lately :(, and my erections are stronger than they have ever been.

Dakine said size doesn't matter to women. Polls taken of women dispute her claim that size doesn't . There are women who vote for 6" length and less in size, about 1 out of 3 do (that's choosing a size isn't it?). And there are women who vote that they don't care what size it is (provided it's not huge or itty bitty), but it's a very small percentage that choose to say they have no preference whatsoever. And granted size is only 'important' to a small percentage of women - about 1 in 10 women (sizequeens). But that leaves 50% who do choose 7" and longer. Doesn't matter on an 'important' level, but I don't think Dakine is talking about that. Dakine is trying to convey the idea it makes no difference in bed whatsoever to women. That is simply not so. Also, very absent from Dakine's remarks about size not mattering, the vast majority of women say extra girth is good. How come that about girth keeps getting left out? So many women express extra girth icing on the cake, but over and over it's omitted here. Hmmm.

Avatar for katmandoo2001
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
In reply to: charmasak
Sun, 07-30-2006 - 10:43pm

And so how you purpose a man gain extra GIRTH then?

I'm still in complete agreement with dakine. Regardless of all these supposed studies, I've never known a woman who rejected a man simply because his penis was too small. Particularly, if he had many other wonderful qualities that provide for great sex.

No, it's important to a few women to that degree, but for the majority, it's just not the make or break factor of a relationship. Of course, it might be easier to blame his size if she isn't getting her needs met.

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-25-2006
In reply to: charmasak
Mon, 07-31-2006 - 1:43am

I'm of the same school of thought now. Average sized man, average sized penis (and that's fine by me and most I think). Short/small man, short/small penis. Tall/broad man, long/broad penis. Been to all 3 and have experienced it myself.

Really thinking the 3rd option has more potential tho'.