Drugs? Should we go there?
Find a Conversation
Drugs? Should we go there?
| Mon, 08-07-2006 - 6:47am |
I have been surprised to see a couple of recent threads here concerning (and subtlety promoting!) the use of illegal drugs as sexual enhancers.
Remember, these are the same boards that require us to use "proper" terminology when discussing body parts and don't allow us to post links to any sites which may include "offensive" material.
Believe me, I am far from being a prude, but I can't help but wonder whether this is a good thing.

Pages
Why, I oughta . . . LM is like a sister to me! Okay, okay . . . maybe more like a distant cousin, who grew up in the next county over, and wears something sexy to all the reunions . . . oh, I'm sorry, wasn't the 4th of July, like, last week? Did I miss something?
:)
Yes, you could choose to construe the statement "there is nothing like sex on ecstasy" to mean nothing more than that it is differenct, but only if choose to beleive that sublime's post was an incoherent string of unrelated sentences. Look at the context in which the comment about ecstasy was written. It immediately followed sublime's comment that alcohol and pot do enhance sex and was clearly meant to mean that the benefits of ecstasy exceed even those of alcohol and pot. Just in case anyone missed the point, sublime goes on to present specific benefits of using ecstasy without mentioning any negatives (until just recently).
Jackson is absolutely correct, the title of the thread strongly implies that sex can be enhanced through the use of illegal drugs. Sublime's post clearly endorsed the use of pot to enhance sex and pretty much endorsed "the love drug" as well. Apparently that wasn't sublime's intent, but that was the message of what he/she posted.
Personally, I don't care whether people discuss drugs here or not. It doesn't offend me if they do, but lighten up on Jackson. He didn't complain or denounce anybody, he just raised a valid topic for discussion.
Pages