I think porn is disgusting
Find a Conversation
I think porn is disgusting
| Mon, 11-13-2006 - 11:54am |
But mostly, it's just boring and stupid.
One of the benefits of high speed internet is now I can watch porn videos online.

Pages
I'll just tack my two cents on the end here. Agree with the degrading crap, can't stand to see a guy grab the back of a womans head and SHOVE her face down on him (GAG, literally), the just beating on the women is a turn off to, some gentle spanking is O.K., does nothing really for me, just doesn't make things go limp like those first two.
I have found myself prefering the movies with a story line also and DW mentioned Candida Royale last night and led to an interesting exchange....after reading this whole thread I think I would like some of her movies. As to the early to mid '90's, I didn't know the exact time frame, but I knew there was a certain "generation" of porn movies that were just sooooo hot. Like someone else said, a "little" more of the romance and story line of the 70's without the cheesiness and of course the shaved and trimmed vulva and genitals. You get much past that and it get's boring. Also more natural body parts in that era of movies....there is a rap song from I think the late 90's called "Baby got Back" and one of the lines goes something like "silicone is for toys" LOL....every time I hear that line I LMAO, because that is how I feel. It is also one of the few rap songs ABOUT women that isn't degrading....it is about the women being natural and "healthy"....another line says "36 - 24 - 36, only if shes 5' 3""....LMAO at that one too. Hope I didn't offend anyone there, but MHO.
Anyway, back to the thread, I have started to see more movies with a story line and actual "romance" and OMG, the guy actually left his clothes on and performed oral until the girl "orgasmed" (wasn't the big production either, looked pretty real and natural) and then the sex wasn't just pounding. Alot of these modern videos, if you watch, the producer cuts and pastes about three times....the actual sex is probably 2 to 5 minutes long and it gets stretched to 20 min. To echo everyone else, I feel sorry for anyone trying to copy that and feeling inadequate when they can't.
I myself am wishing I could find videos of women masturbating WITHOUT a MALE director telling them what to do, just a woman playing with herself to pleasure herself. I am REAL leery of P2P's though and I doubt if there are any commercial videos out there like that. One can hope though.
This is getting long so I will post it before it gets longer,
tk
Edited 11/21/2006 2:11 pm ET by danidi
Me neitherrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jim
>Whatever the definition, it's gross and it's not something I want to see in porn OR >something I want to talk about on the board.
Hmmm so is this act too Taboo for Taboos? I thought the purpose of this board was to foster the exchange of sexual ideas without passing judgment.
I have been reading this board for many years. Seen it go through at least 3 technical migrations. During the years I've read lots of taboo things on this board all kinds of fetishes.
Why the hangup on feltching?
DMAM
Maybe I'm weird but I love porn -- the dirtier the better. ATM, throatjob, bukkake, all of it. I'll take a good anal feltch over some cheesy "erotic" video any day.
Don't judge. It's a free country. Some people like comedies, others like watching people screw.
>>>>Whatever the definition, it's gross and it's not something I want to see in porn OR >something I want to talk about on the board. <<<
Although you addressed your comment to someone else, I think I'm the one who said that.
>Even though this is the Taboos board, we have limits about what we're allowed to discuss >because we're supposed to keep it PG-13 and not R or X-rated.
Are you kidding me? This board has been beyond PG-13 since it first came on the net. I don’t know anything PG-13 about anal play, cream-pies threesomes and strap-ons. If there is I sure missed out on a lot of stuff during those years.
>The powers that be made the distinction that if we talk in detail about bodily fluids >we've entered R or X-rated territory and they delete the posts.
Does spit and saliva count? Have the powers that be ever read Cosmo or Redbook? They can get into some sexual details there.
I don’t think we need to get into a very detail explanation of anything. To me the idea is that we are all adults and can have an adult conversation regarding sex and sexual practices with out being graphic or offensive. I don’t think I have ever seen anyone drop the F bomb here, so I missed your point. The board seems to behave well.
I agree that some of what you could have described would not have been desirable to me, but had you chosen to post it I could have easily hit the next button and not continued reading. Those that wanted to could have had a discussion as they have in the past about creampies without getting into the graphic details. If one asked what a creampie is they could be advised to google it.
My apologies and no insult intended but,
>Whatever the definition, it's gross and it's not something I want to see in porn
So don’t.
>OR something I want to talk about on the board.
Maybe others do. I think you can dictate how things are discussed but not what can be discussed, especially when it comes to Taboos.(barring acts that that are illegal)
The CL chair has a heavy crown you wear. I know your duties include stirring things up for dialoge. (helps the traffic) But don’t stir up the pots and then throw everyone out of the kitchen. As long as the dialogue is maintained in a manner that is not vulgar then the "powers that be" should not have a problem with it. They get a lot of quality traffic at this site and I am sure advertising is starting to pay off.
Enjoy your time off and Holiday!
DMAM
Pages