Some Sad News........

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-29-2009
Some Sad News........
14
Wed, 06-03-2009 - 12:08am

The End of 100-Calorie Packs?


Why portion-controlled snacks are falling out of favor.

Posted by Susannah at MSN Health on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:44 AM


When the marketing minds at Kraft came up with the idea to package snack foods in individual 100-calorie servings, a snack revolution was born. It seemed like a great idea at the time--consumers could have all of their favorite treats and lose weight without feeling deprived. Why skip dessert when Kraft made it so easy to indulge in a sensible, but still indulgent bag of Oreo cookies (albeit in a tiny portion and without the cream filling)? Calorie-conscious snackers rewarded Kraft's marketing ingenuity with sales that totaled more than $75 million in the first year.

Other food manufacturers followed suit, and today it's easy to find 100-calorie packs of products from Planter's peanuts to Ritz crackers to Chips Ahoy! cookies. Since January 2008, 258 products making the 100-calorie claim have been introduced, but Brand Week reports that these products are falling out of favor, as evidence suggests that imposing portion control through food packaging doesn't actually promote weight loss.

A study reported in the Journal of Consumer Research found that participants given 100-calorie snack packs while watching television ate significantly more than those who were given regular-sized bags of potato chips to snack from. Food analyst Marcia Mogelonsky, Ph.D., tells Brand Week that the 100-calorie packs were "a license to overeat."

Portion control as a tool for weight loss may be falling out of favor according to some experts, with "satiety" taking its place as the buzzword du jour. Satiety, which comes from eating foods that are rich in fiber and protein, refers to a feeling of hunger satisfaction—something you don't get from snacking on cookies, candies and other processed treats.

mommyjade2005.gif image by y_baros  Click & Join the Challenge   work6.gif picture by y_baros 





 


yougogirl

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-29-2009
Wed, 06-03-2009 - 12:20pm

True about putting things in small bags,
Can add more flexibility to your lunches etc.
I guess I'm just to lazy to do that,
And I would probably make to many choices for myself.

mommyjade2005.gif image by y_baros

 


yougogirl

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-10-2003
Wed, 06-03-2009 - 1:18pm

The cheap gene does NOT make allowances for single servings I package myself, because I know the rest of the box, package is there and sometimes too tempting!

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-27-2004
Wed, 06-03-2009 - 3:05pm
It's good to know what works for you and your family nutrition & time

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-07-2008
Wed, 06-03-2009 - 4:44pm

The only ones I tried are the chocolate covered pretzels and the chex flavored ones. I eat only 1/2 of the small bag at a time anyway.


Pages