That was an interesting article, Pam. If you remember your discussion point about Goddess setting everything back in harmony, it seems that it is coming true. But a comment in the article was very interesting. The comment was that Liberia wasn't ready to be ruled by a woman. (I guess that was correct). In my opinion, the ones that say that are the ones that wish to keep women down. In fact, I think the correct comment was about warfare. Well, it's obvious that this person hasn't paid attention to the women of the world when it comes down to warfare. One example is Queen Elizabeth, she maybe a figurehead, but such loyalty to the Queen is very strong. Or may I say former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, she was England's Iron Lady, and no one treated her like a lap dog. And from my understanding women in Israel must enroll in the Israeli army when she is young. And not to mention our resident military women (Happy Belated Vetern's Day!), they have proven that women can fight in a war as well as any man. And as the saying goes here in the United States, behind every great man is a strong woman.
I think if they give this "Iron Lady" a chance she will prove that a woman can be as much as a warrior than a man can be, and in my opinion, I think women are better negotiators then men any day. Of course, there may be the off day, that she's going through menopause (Gigi ducks), or Auntie Flo is visiting. But on most occasions, if the woman is on an even keel, every thing will be ok.
Hugs,
Laurie
Check out my new blog.
co-cl of Lesbian Life Message Board
Email- didoangst@comcast.net
http://didoangst.blogspot.com/
http://www.4-lesbianlife.com/
This is very encouraging. I just want to know when the United States is going to wake up and acknowledge that it can be led by a woman just as it can by a man (excepting W).
That was an interesting article, Pam. If you remember your discussion point about Goddess setting everything back in harmony, it seems that it is coming true. But a comment in the article was very interesting. The comment was that Liberia wasn't ready to be ruled by a woman. (I guess that was correct). In my opinion, the ones that say that are the ones that wish to keep women down. In fact, I think the correct comment was about warfare. Well, it's obvious that this person hasn't paid attention to the women of the world when it comes down to warfare. One example is Queen Elizabeth, she maybe a figurehead, but such loyalty to the Queen is very strong. Or may I say former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, she was England's Iron Lady, and no one treated her like a lap dog. And from my understanding women in Israel must enroll in the Israeli army when she is young. And not to mention our resident military women (Happy Belated Vetern's Day!), they have proven that women can fight in a war as well as any man. And as the saying goes here in the United States, behind every great man is a strong woman.
I think if they give this "Iron Lady" a chance she will prove that a woman can be as much as a warrior than a man can be, and in my opinion, I think women are better negotiators then men any day. Of course, there may be the off day, that she's going through menopause (Gigi ducks), or Auntie Flo is visiting. But on most occasions, if the woman is on an even keel, every thing will be ok.
Once again, interesting article.
Hugs!
Hugs,
Sebastian
http://www.facebook.com/sebastianbruce
Laurie
Check out my new blog.
co-cl of Lesbian Life Message Board
Email- didoangst@comcast.net
http://didoangst.blogspot.com/
http://homepage.mac.com/lauriedav/PhotoAlbum1.html
This is very encouraging. I just want to know when the United States is going to wake up and acknowledge that it can be led by a woman just as it can by a man (excepting W).