Bush: Iraqi weapons will be found

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
Bush: Iraqi weapons will be found
Fri, 04-25-2003 - 10:09am
Or we'll 'find' them for them...which is why the U.N. should be involved in the 'search'. I mean, puh-lease, they 'destroyed' them beforehand?!?!

Also, how many plan on watching Brokaw's interview of Pres. Bush this evening? I, for one, will be watching a rerun of CSI... ;-)


NBC, MSNBC and news services

Although the search has come up empty to date, President Bush believes that coalition forces will uncover weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. "It's going to take time to find them," he told NBC News in his first wide-ranging interview since he ordered military action to oust Saddam Hussein. He conceded that "there's going to be a lot of skepticism until people find ... weapons of mass destruction program."

DURING A SWING through Ohio on Thursday, Bush raised the possibility that any Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were destroyed before or during the U.S.-led war, suggesting for the first time that coalition troops may come up empty in their search.

"He tried to fool the United Nations and did for 12 years by hiding these weapons. And so it's going to take time to find them," the president said at the Lima Army Tank Plant. "But we know he had them. And whether he destroyed them, moved them or hid them, we're going to find out the truth."

Senior administration officials began this week to scale back expectations that weapons of mass destruction would be found. Bush's spokesman, Ari Fleischer, said Wednesday that success of the search effort depends "not on finding something by bumping into it" but on information provided by Iraqis who might have been involved in such programs.

However, in his interview with NBC's Tom Brokaw, the president maintained that the evidence will be found.

"And the best way to find them is to continue to collect information from the humans, Iraqis who were involved with hiding them," he said.

Uncovering weapons of mass destruction would go a great way toward assuaging critics of American policy, notably in Europe, who have said that the evidence against Saddam was not conclusive before Bush went to war.


As for the fate of Saddam, Bush said there was "some evidence" that U.S. air strikes on the first night of the Iraq war may have killed or severely wounded the Iraqi leader.

That would clear up some other mysteries, he said, including why there weren't more oil field fires, why dams weren't blown up and why the Iraqi defense of Baghdad was so uncoordinated.

Bush was asked about intelligence on Saddam's purported whereabouts that led to the bombing raid on the first night of the war. "As the intelligence got richer, I got more confident with the notion that Saddam would, in fact, be there," he said.

Some U.S. officials later suggested that Saddam may have survived that first bombing, if not later blasts targeting him and his sons.

But Bush said there's still a chance that the strike that first night did the job. It might "explain why dams weren't blown up or oil fields weren't destroyed, even though we found them wired potentially to be blown up," he said.


In a wide-ranging interview on Thursday aboard Air Force One -- his first extensive one since before the war -- Bush cautioned Iran and Syria anew not to interfere in Iraq. But he said in the interview that the United States has "no military plans" against either nation.

Bush acknowledged rising demands from Iraqis that U.S. troops leave Iraq, but he said they would remain "as long as necessary." Could that mean two years? Brokaw asked. "Could -- or less. Who knows," Bush said.

He had pointed words for his critics, from the Dixie Chicks to French President Jacques Chirac.

Of Chirac, who led the opposition at the United Nations to the war against Iraq, Bush said: "I doubt he'll be coming to the ranch any time soon."

Bush has invited other world leaders to his Texas ranch, including Australian Prime Minister John Howard -- a war supporter -- for next weekend.

Bush said the position charted by Chirac for Europe "would weaken ... the NATO alliance."

Of the singing Texas trio, who have been outspoken critics of the U.S.-led war, Bush said, "The Dixie Chicks are free to speak their mind."

At the same time, Bush added: "They shouldn't have their feelings hurt just because some people don't want to buy their records when they speak out. You know, freedom is a two-way street."


In the NBC interview, Bush also:

Said that looting and vandalism, particularly in hospitals and museums was "the absolute worst part" of an otherwise successful military campaign. "It's like uncorking a bottle of frustration," Bush said.

Confided that he was "hesitant at first" to order the first-night bombing. "I was worried that ... the first images of the American attack would be death to young children."

Poked fun at the Iraqi information minister, who gave outlandish briefings denying U.S. forces were in Baghdad when they were just blocks away. "It was one of the classics. It was just unbelievable what he was saying."

Said he hoped to invite Palestinian Prime Minister-designate Mahmoud Abbas to the White House "one of these days. ... I look forward to working with him." Bush indicated longtime Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat would not be invited.

Accused North Korea of returning "to the old blackmail game" in saying on Thursday that it had nuclear weapons -- and might test, export or use them.

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Avatar for goofyfoot
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 04-25-2003 - 2:01pm
One question: How do YOU KNOW weapons will not be found? How do YOU KNOW they were not destroyed beforehand? I'll bet you were one of those who wanted to give Hansi Blixer

ALL the time in the world to inspect for weapons, but who now want Bush to rush to find

them. LOL! Your "I HATE BUSH" bias makes me wonder why you are CL.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 04-25-2003 - 2:15pm
Since the Iraqi army folded in record time, it is obvious that they were not a threat to the USA or to their neighbors and that allowing the inspectors more time would have been justified. There wasn't any reason for this rush to war and conservatives can't deny that FACT.

As far as calling the CL a bush Hater, the opposite could be said about another CL.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
Fri, 04-25-2003 - 2:44pm
In the first place, I don't hate Pres. Bush. Hate is a wasteful & useless emotion that blinds people and closes their minds. I don't agree with his politics, but then I'm a moderate non-Christian liberal - why would I? I believe this administration has made poor choices - that's my right. And, as an unaligned voter, I don't necessarily support the Democrats either - in fact, I'm not terribly happy with either party at the moment.

That said...I really don't believe that there were the WMD that the administration claimed there were. If there had been, they would have been used as soon as we started 'liberating' their country. There was absolutely no reason not to use them, since it's obvious Hussein cared little for the people of his country. That is why I doubt that they will ever find any WMD. I don't care how fast this administration searches - that has nothing to do with the issue at hand - and I don't know why you even suggested it. I just feel that the U.N. should be there to oversee, because, truthfully, I wouldn't put it past our country to 'find' something in order to save face.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-17-2003
Fri, 04-25-2003 - 2:45pm
Simple logic: Blix said they were gone, and the Saddam regime had more than enough time to remove any in the weeks leading up to the war if they DID have some.

It's not what I see as 'Bush hating', it's a fair assessment of all the current facts at hand. With the war over, the burden of proof is on the Bush Administration to show the world the immediate threat, not vice versa.

Doesn't matter which side of the partisan fence you sit on. People want to see, not take the word of a biased administration or committee as gospel.