Al Gore endorses Howard Dean.
Find a Conversation
| Tue, 12-09-2003 - 9:17am |

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/09/elec04.prez.gore.dean/index.html
Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean's bid for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination on Tuesday, substantially deepening Dean's fast-developing drive for dominance in the nine-candidate field of would-be challengers to President Bush.
"I'm very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean as the next president of the United States of America," Gore said.
The announcement in Manhattan's Harlem, coming on the morning of another debate between the "'04 Dems," as they're called, could cement Dean's status as the leading Democratic candidate heading into the kickoff contests now just weeks away in Iowa and New Hampshire.
"We need to remake the Democratic Party, we need to remake America," Gore said.
"This nation cannot afford to have four more years of a Bush-Cheney administration," he said.
Prior to Tuesday's endorsement, a source told CNN that Gore -- the Democratic Party's presidential candidate in 2000 -- thinks a protracted primary campaign would serve only to help President Bush.
"In a field of great candidates, one candidate clearly now stands out and so I'm asking all of you to join in this grassroots movement to elect Howard Dean president of the United States," Gore said.
Dean thanked Gore for his leadership: "We have needed a strong steady hand in this party and I appreciate Al's willing(ness) to stand up and be one," Dean said.
Gore said part of the reason he chose to endorse Dean was his ability to appeal to the nation's "grassroots" elements, a reference to Dean's success in organizing and raising funds on the Internet and in small voter gatherings.
Gore also praised Dean's opposition to the U.S.-led war in Iraq. The former vice president called the Iraqi war a "catastrophic mistake" by the Bush administration, a move that leaves the United States less effective in the nation's battle against terrorism. He said the United States is now in a "quagmire" in Iraq.
Gore said that he and Dean would travel together to Iowa following the announcement. Gore was to give a speech later in the day in Cedar Rapids. The Iowa Caucus is set for January 19.
Dean was expected to travel on to New Hampshire for Tuesday evening's Democratic debate s-sponsored by ABC News and WMUR-TV. The New Hampshire primary is scheduled for January 27.
The announcement came nearly three years to the date from Gore's concession in the 2000 election, when he won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, Gore's vice-presidential running mate in 2000 and a current presidential hopeful, said he would continue to "to fight for what's right, win this nomination, and defeat George W. Bush next year."
"I have a lot of respect for Al Gore -- that is why I kept my promise not to run if he did," Lieberman said.
"Ultimately, the voters will make the determination and I will continue to make my case about taking our party and nation forward," Lieberman said in a written statement.
A source close to Lieberman said Gore, who was Clinton's vice president, did not call Lieberman to inform him of the decision.
Dean pulling ahead
With the Dean campaign gaining momentum, a new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows Dean widening his front-runner status among the eight other Democratic candidates.
The poll showed that 25 percent of registered Democrats surveyed support Dean as their nominee, with retired Gen. Wesley Clark coming in second with 17 percent. (Poll: Dean's New Hampshire lead increases)
In an interview before the news broke on CNN's "Judy Woodruff's Inside Politics," Dean played down his front-runner status.
"The pundits in Washington have been talking about me as the front-runner for a long time," Dean said.
"Well, guess what, the people of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Arizona and so forth get to decide who the front-runner is. So, it's nice talk but I'm not buying it."
Caught off-guard
Erik Smith, a campaign press secretary for Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, sounded as if the Gephardt team was caught off-guard by the news, as were Dean's other rivals.
Dean and Gephardt are the top two candidates in Iowa. (Gephardt calls for increased homeland security funding)
"Dick Gephardt fought side-by-side with Al Gore to pass the Clinton economic plan, pass the assault weapons ban and defend against Republican attacks on Medicare and affirmative action. On each of these issues, Howard Dean was on the wrong side," Smith said.
Saying he respected Gore and fought for his campaign four years ago, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts said, "This election is about the future, not about the past." (Kerry: Bush administration arrogant, reckless)
"This election will be decided by voters, across the country, beginning with voters in Iowa," he said.
Paul Begala, a political adviser to President Clinton and now a host of CNN's "Crossfire," called the endorsement an "enormous boost" that would clearly give Dean momentum going into Iowa and New Hampshire.
"It's very good for him," Begala said. "I wouldn't go so far as to say it locks anything up, though, because people want to make up their own minds."
cl-Libraone


Pages
http://messageboards.ivillage.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=iv-elpoliticsto&msg=2456.1&ctx=0
Renee
I don't know what this has to do with Dean, Gore, Bush or Clinton but I'll bite.
We are not the only country with a weak military. What about Spain Austria, Japan, New Zealand etc...Surely you aren't insinuating that these countries have also forfeited their rights to soverignty?
We have recently had a change in leadership and the jury is still out on what type of military spending is likely to take place in the next while. So I don't think you are in a position right now to make assumptions on how much we will sink into the military in the future. There is certainly a larger outpouring of public support for increasing spending in that area.
I know 9/11 has changed everything especially in regards to how secure one feels in the world these days but considering that we have never had to spend any money to defend ourselves in the past perhaps that was money better off NOT spent. At least now we can buy all new stuff and not have to worry about where to get rid of the old obsolete stuff we never had a chance to use.
;o)
>"lead the party back to the unelectable left."<
Moving to the left is the common sense move, IMO. People are tired of 'big business as usual'. The Dem. Party has become Rep. light by moving to the centre.
As for the Clinton/Gore difference of opinion about candidates.... neither Clinton has officially come out with an endorsement.
>"Gore tried to set himself up as the Democratic kingmaker and in effect the party leader - usurping a role that Bill Clinton sees as his by right."<
>"we have never had to spend any money to defend ourselves in the past perhaps that was money better off NOT spent."<
Agreed!
I've been trying to figure out who or what Canada's enemies are. ;)
cl-Libraone
I'm sure there are those who'd like to wipe those "polite" smiles off our faces and shake us by our passive aggressive shoulders...or at least knock us off our fenceposts.
LOL
Truthfully though. I would like us to be in a better position to defend OTHER PEOPLE than we are in right now.
Ummm excuse me? Do you even know what you just stated? His father FINISHED the job he set out to do. His job was NOT to remove Saddam from power, his job was to remove him from invading. He did that. I love how you all try to spin that one. It is an old, amusing spin that is starting to bore me.
Agreed!
I've been trying to figure out who or what Canada's enemies are. ;)>>>
They have no enemies because that country is a wreck. They have absolutely nothing anyone wants.
;O)
Will President finish the job for his father?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/10/11/wirq111.xml
Bush calls Saddam 'the guy who tried to kill my dad'
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/27/bush.war.talk/
Saddam 'tried to kill my dad' - Bush
http://iafrica.com/news/worldnews/165477.htm
>>"Truthfully though. I would like us to be in a better position to defend OTHER PEOPLE than we are in right now."<<
Careful what you wish for.
Alexa
I guess right now I'm feeling the US has gotten a bad reputation for no good reason.
In some respects, no, we don't deserve it, but in others...honestly, our government (through administrations going back into the 1960's) has made some pretty stupid and ill-advised alliances and military decisions.
Pages