Al Gore endorses Howard Dean.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Al Gore endorses Howard Dean.
132
Tue, 12-09-2003 - 9:17am
Gore: 'Proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean'   Vote Dean     Democrat

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/09/elec04.prez.gore.dean/index.html


Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean's bid for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination on Tuesday, substantially deepening Dean's fast-developing drive for dominance in the nine-candidate field of would-be challengers to President Bush.


"I'm very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean as the next president of the United States of America," Gore said.


The announcement in Manhattan's Harlem, coming on the morning of another debate between the "'04 Dems," as they're called, could cement Dean's status as the leading Democratic candidate heading into the kickoff contests now just weeks away in Iowa and New Hampshire.


"We need to remake the Democratic Party, we need to remake America," Gore said.


"This nation cannot afford to have four more years of a Bush-Cheney administration," he said.


Prior to Tuesday's endorsement, a source told CNN that Gore -- the Democratic Party's presidential candidate in 2000 -- thinks a protracted primary campaign would serve only to help President Bush.


"In a field of great candidates, one candidate clearly now stands out and so I'm asking all of you to join in this grassroots movement to elect Howard Dean president of the United States," Gore said.


Dean thanked Gore for his leadership: "We have needed a strong steady hand in this party and I appreciate Al's willing(ness) to stand up and be one," Dean said.


Gore said part of the reason he chose to endorse Dean was his ability to appeal to the nation's "grassroots" elements, a reference to Dean's success in organizing and raising funds on the Internet and in small voter gatherings.


Gore also praised Dean's opposition to the U.S.-led war in Iraq. The former vice president called the Iraqi war a "catastrophic mistake" by the Bush administration, a move that leaves the United States less effective in the nation's battle against terrorism. He said the United States is now in a "quagmire" in Iraq.


Gore said that he and Dean would travel together to Iowa following the announcement. Gore was to give a speech later in the day in Cedar Rapids. The Iowa Caucus is set for January 19.


Dean was expected to travel on to New Hampshire for Tuesday evening's Democratic debate s-sponsored by ABC News and WMUR-TV. The New Hampshire primary is scheduled for January 27.


The announcement came nearly three years to the date from Gore's concession in the 2000 election, when he won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote.


Sen. Joe Lieberman, Gore's vice-presidential running mate in 2000 and a current presidential hopeful, said he would continue to "to fight for what's right, win this nomination, and defeat George W. Bush next year."


"I have a lot of respect for Al Gore -- that is why I kept my promise not to run if he did," Lieberman said.


"Ultimately, the voters will make the determination and I will continue to make my case about taking our party and nation forward," Lieberman said in a written statement.


A source close to Lieberman said Gore, who was Clinton's vice president, did not call Lieberman to inform him of the decision.


Dean pulling ahead

With the Dean campaign gaining momentum, a new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows Dean widening his front-runner status among the eight other Democratic candidates.


The poll showed that 25 percent of registered Democrats surveyed support Dean as their nominee, with retired Gen. Wesley Clark coming in second with 17 percent. (Poll: Dean's New Hampshire lead increases)


In an interview before the news broke on CNN's "Judy Woodruff's Inside Politics," Dean played down his front-runner status.


"The pundits in Washington have been talking about me as the front-runner for a long time," Dean said.


"Well, guess what, the people of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Arizona and so forth get to decide who the front-runner is. So, it's nice talk but I'm not buying it."


Caught off-guard

Erik Smith, a campaign press secretary for Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, sounded as if the Gephardt team was caught off-guard by the news, as were Dean's other rivals.


Dean and Gephardt are the top two candidates in Iowa. (Gephardt calls for increased homeland security funding)


"Dick Gephardt fought side-by-side with Al Gore to pass the Clinton economic plan, pass the assault weapons ban and defend against Republican attacks on Medicare and affirmative action. On each of these issues, Howard Dean was on the wrong side," Smith said.


Saying he respected Gore and fought for his campaign four years ago, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts said, "This election is about the future, not about the past." (Kerry: Bush administration arrogant, reckless)


"This election will be decided by voters, across the country, beginning with voters in Iowa," he said.


Paul Begala, a political adviser to President Clinton and now a host of CNN's "Crossfire," called the endorsement an "enormous boost" that would clearly give Dean momentum going into Iowa and New Hampshire.


"It's very good for him," Begala said. "I wouldn't go so far as to say it locks anything up, though, because people want to make up their own minds."








cl-Libraone

 


Photobucket&nbs

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-25-2003
Fri, 12-12-2003 - 7:02pm
Artists are so tempermental, aren't they? Did you know that some believe the size of an artist's talent is in direct proportion to his ego?

Of course, I wouldn't go that far, but I would question those who allowed their personal opinions to cloud their judgement. All these critics who 'live for art' proved that are all talk and no heart because they refused accept a masterpiece that will be judged for what it is by another genertion. The loss is theirs and the people's of the time because tehy never got a chance to see it.

Renee

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-31-2003
Fri, 12-12-2003 - 8:54pm
All right, this extended metaphor has gone too far! If you're suggesting that President Bush is a Van Gogh-like misunderstood genius whom we should all just "ooh" and "ahh" over as he sculpts a new world order, then I have only one response:

http://www.museumsnett.no/nasjonalgalleriet/munch/eng/innhold/fullsize/ngm00939.html

Avatar for ahlmommy
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 12-12-2003 - 9:13pm
Like I said...Clinton went after Iraq to deflect attention from his *situation* he had at home.
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 9:33am

If I wish to hear or ask for

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 10:03am

>"It's a country of the wealthy."<


Tell that to people that are unemployed, working low paying jobs, a couple of p/t jobs, without health insurance.


Clean off those rose coloured glasses.

cl-Libraone

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 10:14am
ITA!

cl-Libraone

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-31-2003
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 11:14am
I swear I'm not trying to be obtuse here...I understand that you're accusing Cinton of only taking military action against Iraq as a distraction. But what I keep asking you is this: what should Clinton's stance against Iraq have been? Are you saying that he should NOT have used military force to try to bring Saddam in compliance with UN resolutions?

In case you don't get my point, here's a breakdown of policy / accused intention:

Bush I Policy: Push Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait.

Bush I accused of: Creating this monster to begin with & not supporting a popular uprising against Saddam.

Clinton Policy: ___________________(this is the blank I'm asking you to fill in.)

Clinton accused of: Bombing Iraq only as a distraction from political woes.

Bush II Policy: Overthrow Saddam Hussein.

Bush II accused of: War for oil.

I know how I'd fill in the blank, but I'm curious what your answer is.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2003
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 12:25pm
<>

You can afford to laugh, unfortunately there are millions who don't have your good life. I wonder what has happened to compassion in the US. Do you not read the articles about the problems with prescription drugs, the number of people out of work. Have you not heard of the diminishing middle class?

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2003
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 12:35pm
<>

This statement makes no sense to me. I see a country that is composed of some wealthy, some poor, and a diminishing middle class. Are we talking about the same country?

Avatar for ahlmommy
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Sat, 12-13-2003 - 2:42pm
<<>

Good for you

<<>>

WHY?? You think politicians can't be religious?

<<>>

How do you know a politician isn't a deacon? Maybe a minister??

<<>>

Then don't listen...many of us aren't offended. Lots of things I hear democrats say I don't want to hear....it isn't worthy of my time. It is easy to tune them out. Genuine?? LMAO...I am guessing you are a bit confused about being a christian. If Ossam Bin Laden or Saddam were standing in front of me I would easily put a bullet in their head. Does that make me not a christian?

Pages