Patriot Act 2 signed stealthily

Avatar for kathaksung
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-11-2003
Patriot Act 2 signed stealthily
1
Mon, 01-05-2004 - 5:47pm
It can be another proof that arrest of Saddam was a designated one. They use a big event to divert another one which government don't want the people pay attention at.

Quote, "WITH A WHISPER, NOT A BANG

By David Martin 12/24/2003

Bush signs parts of Patriot Act II into law — stealthily

O n December 13, when U.S. forces captured Saddam Hussein, President George W. Bush not only celebrated with his national security team, but also pulled out his pen and signed into law a bill that grants the FBI sweeping new powers. A White House spokesperson explained the curious timing of the signing - on a Saturday - as "the President signs bills seven days a week." But the last time Bush signed a bill into law on a Saturday happened more than a year ago - on a spending bill that the President needed to sign, to prevent shutting down the federal government the following Monday.

http://www.sacurrent.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=10705756&BRD=2318&PAG=461&dept_id=482778&rfi=6

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-31-2003
Thu, 01-08-2004 - 6:14pm
This was pretty sneaky, and had me scratching my head wondering "doesn't Congress have to approve the bill before the President can sign it into law?" Apparently our representatives in Washington are asleep at the wheel and didn't notice this important line of legislation had been slipped into the yearly Intelligence Authorization Act until it was too late. Although I sort of find that hard to believe.

"Dempsey said the Intelligence Authorization Act is a favorite vehicle of politicians for expanding government powers without careful scrutiny. The bill, because of its sensitive nature, is generally drafted in relative secrecy and approved without extensive debate because it is viewed as a "must-pass" piece of legislation. The act provides funding for intelligence agencies."

http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,61792,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1

from the same article:

"A number of other representatives expressed concern that the financial provision was slipped into the Intelligence Act at the 11th hour with no time for public debate and against objections from members the Senate Judiciary Committee, which normally has jurisdiction over the FBI. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), the minority leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, along with five other members of the Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to the Intelligence Committee requesting that their committee be given time to review the bill. But the provision had already passed by the time their letter went out. "

"Charlie Mitchell, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said many legislators failed to recognize the significance of the legislation until it was too late. But he said the fact that 15 Republicans and over 100 Democrats voted against the Conference Report of the bill indicated that, had there been more time, there probably would have been sufficient opposition to remove the provision. "

"The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 grants the FBI unprecedented power to obtain records from financial institutions without requiring permission from a judge. "

Want to know more about what exactly this new power entails? Luckily, our plain-talking, regular guy president explains this Act to the public at the Whitehouse website:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011228-3.html