U.S. may severely limit Iraqi sovereignt

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
U.S. may severely limit Iraqi sovereignt
2
Fri, 04-23-2004 - 2:52pm
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/170354_iraq23.html

U.S. may severely limit Iraqi sovereignty after handover

Friday, April 23, 2004


By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
THE NEW YORK TIMES


WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration plans for a new caretaker government in Iraq would place severe limits on its sovereignty, including only partial command over its armed forces and no authority to enact new laws, administration officials said yesterday.


These restrictions to the plan negotiated with Lakhdar Brahimi, the special United Nations envoy, were presented in detail for the first time by top administration officials at congressional hearings this week, culminating in long and intense questioning at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday at a hearing on the goal of returning Iraq to self-rule June 30.


Only 10 weeks from the transfer of sovereignty, the administration is still not sure exactly who will govern in Baghdad, or precisely how they will be selected. A week ago, President Bush agreed to a recommendation by Brahimi to dismantle the existing Iraqi Governing Council, which was handpicked by the United States, and replace it with a caretaker government whose makeup is to be decided next month.


That government would stay in power until elections are held, beginning next year. The administration's plans seem likely to face objections on several fronts. Several European and U.N. diplomats said in interviews that they do not think that the United Nations will go along with a Security Council resolution sought by Washington that handcuffs the new Iraq government in its authority over its own armed forces, let alone foreign forces on its soil.


These diplomats, and some American officials, said that if the American military command orders a siege of an Iraqi city, and there is no language calling for an Iraqi government to participate in the decision, the government might not be able to survive protests that could follow.


The diplomats added that it may be unrealistic to expect the new Iraqi government not to demand the right to change Iraqi laws put in place by the American occupation under L. Paul Bremer, including provisions limiting the influence of Islamic religious law.


Democratic and Republican senators appeared frustrated yesterday that so few details are known at this late stage in the transition process, and several focused on the question of who would be in charge of Iraq's security. Asked whether the new Iraqi government would have a chance to approve military operations led by American commanders, who would be in charge of both foreign and Iraqi forces, a senior administration said Americans would have the final say.


"The arrangement would be, I think as we are doing today, that we would do our very best to consult with that interim government and take their views into account," said Marc Grossman, undersecretary of state for political affairs. But he added that American commanders will "have the right, and the power, and the obligation" to decide.


That formulation is especially sensitive at a time when American and Iraqi forces are poised to fight for control of Fallujah, a city where thousands of anti-American resisters are surrounded. American generals have warned that an assault on the city will begin within days if the rebels do not surrender their arms, as Iraqi government and local leaders have asked.


In another sphere, Grossman said there would be curbs on the powers of the national conference of Iraqis that Brahimi envisions as a consultative body. The conference, he said, is not expected to pass laws or revise laws adopted under the American occupation.


As envisioned by Brahimi, the caretaker government is to consist of a president, a prime minister, two vice presidents or deputy prime ministers, and a Cabinet of ministers in each agency. A vast national conference of perhaps a thousand Iraqis would advise it, possibly by establishing a smaller body of perhaps a hundred Iraqis.


His plan supplants an earlier American proposal that would have chosen an Iraqi assembly through caucuses. It also rules out a more recent alternative, which would have handed over control to an expanded version of the current governing council. Since last November, when the June 30 transfer of sovereignty was approved by President Bush and decreed by Bremer in Iraq, the United States has proclaimed that Iraq will have a full transfer of sovereignty on that date.


Grossman, however, referred in testimony on Wednesday to what he said would be "limited sovereignty," a phrase he did not repeat yesterday, apparently because it raised eyebrows among those not expecting the administration to acknowledge that the sovereignty would be less than full-fledged.


The proposed curbs on Iraqi sovereignty are paving the way for what officials and diplomats say is shaping up as another potential battle with American allies as the United Nations is asked to confer legitimacy on the new government.


"Clearly you can't have a sovereign government speaking for Iraq in international forums, and yet leave open this possibility that we'll do something they won't particularly like or disagree with," said an administration official. "There's got to be something to be set up to deal with that possibility."


European and U.N. diplomats said that because the main task of the caretaker government will be to try to secure the support of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, whose supporters are unhappy with some of the laws enacted by the Iraqi Governing Council, there may have to be a change in these laws.


MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN IRAQ YESTERDAY
  • The top Marine commander in Iraq warned Fallujah residents and insurgents in the city that they have "days, not weeks" to turn in heavy weapons. Marines said few weapons had been turned in and that most of those surrendered were old or didn't work.


  • German engineering giant Siemens AG and U.S.-based General Electric Co. suspended some operations because of security concerns, officials said. Siemens was scheduled to finish rehabilitating Iraq's power stations by May 15. Much of the work was already complete. GE said it has suspended some operations in recent weeks because of the violence but is not pulling out.


  • Officials in Washington disclosed a turnaround in Bush administration policy toward former members of Saddam Hussein's political party, allowing Baathists and military officers to get jobs in the new Iraqi army or government. The shift is meant to counter growing Iraqi resistance.


  • Gunmen fatally shot a South African security contractor working for the U.S.-led occupation administration and severely wounded his translator at a supermarket near Baghdad's Sunni Muslim neighborhood of Azamiyah, U.S. officials said.


  • Spain agreed to a U.S. request to leave its intelligence agents in Iraq and not withdraw them along with its 1,300 troops, a Socialist party leader said.


  • Delegates of the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference urged the United Nations to return to Iraq and take "a central role" in restoring peace and security, citing concerns about heavy civilian casualties and alleged abuses by the U.S.-led occupying forces.


  • An employee of RTI International, Nabil George Yaqub Razzouk, was released after being kidnapped April 8 near Najaf in southern Iraq, the North Carolina-based non-profit company said. The company is working to build democratic local governments across Iraq.

    © 1998-2004 Seattle Post-Intelligencer

  • cl-nwtreehugger


     


    Community Leader: In The News & Sports Talk


    I can also be found at Washington, TV Shows & QOTW


    iVillage Member
    Registered: 04-16-2003
    Fri, 04-23-2004 - 4:41pm
    <<"The arrangement would be, I think as we are doing today, that we would do our very best to consult with that interim government and take their views into account," said Marc Grossman, undersecretary of state for political affairs. But he added that American commanders will "have the right, and the power, and the obligation" to decide.>>

    Look who maintains control; sounds like imperialism to me. See the thread "Focus on UN".

    There is the US side and the arab side.

    iVillage Member
    Registered: 03-23-2003
    Fri, 04-23-2004 - 8:12pm

    My thoughts exactly.


    I missed your post and didn't realize that you had already posted the same thing...here's the link to yours...


    http://messageboards.ivillage.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=iv-elinthenews&msg=6433.1

    cl-nwtreehugger