Bush: Iraqi prisoner abuse on Arab TV

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Bush: Iraqi prisoner abuse on Arab TV
281
Wed, 05-05-2004 - 10:17am
Should Bush apologize on Arab TV?
Bush to address Iraqi prisoner abuse on Arab TV.

President Bush will give interviews to two Arab television networks Wednesday about reports of U.S. military personnel abusing Iraqi prisoners, the White House said.


White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the 10-minute interviews with Al-Hurra, a U.S.-sponsored network, and Al Arabiya will take place about 10 a.m. ET (1400 GMT) in the Map Room at the White House.


"This is an opportunity for the president to speak directly to the people of Arab nations and let them know that the images that we all have seen are shameful and unacceptable," McClellan told reporters during a Bush campaign tour.


Referring to photographs that have surfaced showing Iraqi prisoners being abused McClellan said, "The images do not represent what America stands for, nor do they represent the high standards of conduct that the military is committed to uphold. The U.S. believes in treating all people with dignity and respect."


Asked why Bush would not meet with the Arab network Al-Jazeera, McClellan would only say the other two networks "reach a wide range of people in the Middle East."


McClellan said the actions of the accused soldiers at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq "do not represent what 99 percent of the men and women in the military stand for." (Full story)


Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said Tuesday that he would take "all measures necessary" to ensure that abuse of detainees in Iraq "does not happen again."


Rumsfeld defended the Defense Department's handling of the matter in the face of congressional criticism, noting that a criminal investigation by the Army was under way and publicly disclosed three months before what he called "deeply disturbing" photographs were broadcast last week.


"This is a serious problem, and it's something the department is addressing," he said at a Pentagon news briefing. "The system works. The system works."


Rumsfeld said the criminal investigation was one of six launched since January.


More..............


http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/05/iraq.abuse.main/index.html

cl-Libraone~

 


Photobucket&nbs

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
Thu, 05-06-2004 - 3:38pm

Apologizing to the Iraqis would be very acceptable to me.


iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
Thu, 05-06-2004 - 6:02pm

I appreciate that Pres. Bush has now apologized and I'm not belittling that.


iVillage Member
Registered: 05-06-2004
Thu, 05-06-2004 - 9:57pm
Why is everyone making such a big deal about this? When Iraqi soldiers abused Americans, no one cared.
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-01-2004
Thu, 05-06-2004 - 10:24pm
I totally agree that Bush, as Commander In Chief, should be apologizing to the Iraqi people. IMO it was not an apology when Bush told the king of Jordan that he was "sorry for the humiliation suffered by the Iraqi prisoners and humiliation suffered by their families" and he was "equally sorry that people seeing those pictures didn't understand the true nature and heart of America." That's not an apology. It sounds more like a kid who is sorry he got caught doing something he shouldn't. And Bush's "sorry" was to a Jordanian king not the Iraqis. An apology is an admission of fault from the offender, Bush representating the United States, to the offended, the Iraqi people.

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-27-2003
Thu, 05-06-2004 - 11:16pm
Are you for real? Of course we cared. However we are not Iraqi's and we do not act that way. We were there to liberate and free them I thought not humiliate and torture them. Since when is it acceptable to stoop as low as the enemy?
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-05-2004
Fri, 05-07-2004 - 12:56am
We were there to liberate the Iraqis FROM these men. They murder the innocent. They attack our military unexpectedly and against cease fire agreements. These men are murderous thugs. It is wrong that they were mistreated because America is good and our people are good and will not stand for this kind of thing. But it CERTAINLY ISN'T OK for them to murder us either. I am sick and tired of hearing "we were there to liberate them but we tortured them." That is hogwash. We were there to liberate the OPPRESSED - NOT the oppressors...
Avatar for papparic
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-27-2003
Fri, 05-07-2004 - 3:19am
Bush is Commander-in-Chief. Some presidents have even sported the sign, "The Buck Stops Here." (but not GWB)

Since he is in charge, he not only must apologize, he must accept responsibility. If he had any balls, he'd tender his resignation.

(The uproar and fear that Cheney would step into his shoes would be momentum enough to bounce him right back into being a popular president again, maybe even get him re-elected.)

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 05-07-2004 - 7:53am

>"Iraqi soldiers"<


What I saw was an inflamed mob not soldiers.


>"no one cared"<


How can you think that?

cl-Libraone~

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 05-07-2004 - 8:00am

>"IMO it was not an apology when Bush told the king of Jordan that he was "sorry for the humiliation suffered by the Iraqi prisoners and humiliation suffered by their families" "<


ITA "sorry" is for for a minor informal "oops" not a formal apology that SB made directly to the people in question, the Iraqis, not a third party.

cl-Libraone~

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 05-07-2004 - 8:06am

 


Photobucket&nbs

Pages