U.S. weighs in on Uruguay abortion vote

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
U.S. weighs in on Uruguay abortion vote
19
Wed, 05-12-2004 - 12:52pm

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1153&slug=Congress%20Uruguay


Tuesday, May 11, 2004 · Last updated 2:27 p.m. PT


U.S. weighs in on Uruguay abortion vote


By JIM ABRAMS
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER


WASHINGTON -- Rep. Chris Smith says he hopes that he played a small part in stopping Uruguay from becoming the first Latin American nation besides Cuba to legalize abortion. Critics say he was meddling in the affairs of another country.


Smith, R-N.J., and five other anti-abortion House Republicans on April 30 sent letters to Uruguay's senators urging them not to "make the same costly mistake" America made 31 years ago and "legalize the violent murder of unborn children."


On May 5, the Uruguayan Senate rejected, by 17-13, the bill that, in addition to making abortion legal for women in the first trimester of pregnancy, would have promoted sex education, contraceptive distribution and maternal health care services. The bill had already passed Uruguay's House of Representatives.


No one is suggesting that Smith's letter changed the outcome of the Uruguay Senate vote, and even had it passed Jorge Batlle, president of the heavily Roman Catholic country, said he would veto it.


But one sponsor of the bill, Sen. Monica Xavier, said she had filed a complaint with the foreign ministry, and another lawmaker, Sen. Reynaldo Gargano, called the "an act of gross meddling."


Imagine, he told The Associated Press, "if we had sent a similar letter concerning the war on Iraq. ... This was totally improper."


"The letter was a flagrant involvement in another country's constitutional issues," said Angeles Cabria, senior program officer for Latin America at the International Women's Health Coalition. She cited figures showing that 63 percent of Uruguayans supported the legislation, and said the American lawmakers were "basically telling these senators to go against the will of their country."


Smith, a senior member of the House International Relations Committee, dismissed the criticism Monday, saying he regularly talks to foreign ministers and lawmakers from other countries on such issues as drug trafficking and torture. "Lawmakers have a duty to talk to each other on human rights." (me:  "human rights"???)


He said it was also crucial to counter the efforts of pro-choice groups such as Planned Parenthood that approved of the legislation. "This was going to be their launching pad for abortion on demand in Latin America," he said.


But Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., an abortion rights leader, said that in her 18 years in Congress she has never received a letter from a foreign lawmaker telling her how to vote on an issue. She said what also bothered her was the suggestion, because America wields so much power around the world, that "if you don't do this you'll be sorry."


Also signing the letter were Reps. Mike Pence, R-Ind., Todd Akin, R-Mo., Steve King, R-Iowa, Jo Ann Davis, R-Va., and Joseph Pitts, R-Pa. (me:  note these names)


---


On the Net:


Rep. Smith: http://www.house.gov/chrissmith/


International Women's Health Coalition: http://www.iwhc.org/

cl-nwtreehugger


Community Leader:  In The News & Sports Talk
I can also be found at Washington, TV Shows & QOTW


Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 3:04pm

LOL!


iVillage Member
Registered: 05-10-2004
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 3:52pm
Well I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one:)
iVillage Member
Registered: 09-05-2003
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 4:17pm

The letter was unsolicited...and as an elected official of the most 'powerful' country in the world, it carries much more weight than say, a letter from joe schmoe-private citizen.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2003
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 4:56pm
If the letter was on plain paper and he signed his name (no title), and used his home address, I would agree he was free to express his opinion. The foreign government would probably toss it in the wastebasket. Huh! I bet it was sent with all the official pomp and circumstance (including franking) he could muster, so the country is put in a political position, can they afford to disregard the message without endangering there relationship with the US.
iVillage Member
Registered: 05-10-2004
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 4:59pm
That's your interpretation of that, you don't how he sent it or what he did or did not threat...it never said he threated any position with the USA in your article...it's like you are assuming to prove your point.
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2003
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 5:08pm
<<>

Absolutely, no appologies. I have never known a politician who didn't use his office to his advantage. The fact that he sent a plain letter as joe smo is beyond my comprehension.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-23-2003
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 5:16pm

This may be picking nits, but...I totally agree that he is free, as a citizen of this world, to express his opinion.


iVillage Member
Registered: 05-10-2004
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 5:18pm
What's wrong with using your position as an "advantage" Are you not guilty of ever having do so yourself? As a parent do you never use your position to your advantage? How about your postion at work or at church or whatever it may be?
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2003
Thu, 05-13-2004 - 5:41pm
<>

There are instances where power is used correctly, and instances where power is used incorrectly. Surely, you must recognize that. You happen to think he used his position correctly--I do not agree.

Pages