"Fahrenheit 9/11" Hits $$100 million$$

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
"Fahrenheit 9/11" Hits $$100 million$$
57
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 9:38am

"Fahrenheit" Hits 100 (Million)+


http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,14582,00.html?tnews


Sometimes, when the fahrenheit hits 100 in the middle of summer, it's a good thing.



Just ask Michael Moore.


The Oscar-winning filmmaker's latest fireball of a documentary, the President Bush-bashing Fahrenheit 9/11, cooked up another $5 million in ticket sales this weekend, ranking in seventh place on the weekly box-office rundown.


But more importantly, the film, already the highest grossing documentary since its first weekend in theaters, hit the $100 million mark on Saturday, becoming the first doc in history to reach that milestone. Its total haul stands at $103.3 million in five weeks of release. Not too shabby for a film that cost just $6 million to make.


In a conference call Sunday, Moore credited the success to the public's desire to "look for the truth and begin the important discussion and debate that needs to take place in this county." Besides, he said,"right now it's really cool to talk about politics."


Moore also said that judging by his mail and snooping around cineplexes, Fahrenheit 9/11's record box office shows that people "want to go to a good movie. I don't think they are saying, 'Let's go see a documentary tonight.' I think they are saying that they've heard that this movie is funny, they've heard that this movie is sad, they've heard that this movie will show them things that they have never seen before, and I think that's why we all like to go to the movies."


Lions Gate, which, along with IFC Films, agreed to distribute the documentary after it was dissed by Disney, reports Fahrenheit 9/11 has performed best on the coasts, but is peforming strongly throughout the entire country. Although its audience is chiefly Democratic, the film is reportedly also scoring very well with independents. Perhaps most surprisingly, the studio says surveys suggest that more than 40 percent of the Republicans who have seen the movie would recommend it to others.


"I believe this movie is going to bring hundreds of thousands of people to the polls who otherwise were not going to vote," said Moore, who describes audiences as being very moved by the plight of the soldiers and their families. (Sony is planning on releasing a DVD version of the film by September.)


Moore also says that the film has benefited from free publicity, mostly courtesy of conservative types who continue to complain about the film, try to ban it from theaters, encourage illegal downloading of the film or evict Linda Ronstadt from Vegas casinos when she praised the film.


"A month ago it was all about, 'This movie is just going to preach to the converted.' Well the converted came the first weekend...and as each weekend goes by it's not the hardcore political people--they did not wait--the people going now are the people that live in that great gray middle of America, people who don't necessarily consider themselves political people, but who are interested in the movie now because they turn on the TV and it's Linda Ronstadt one day, it's people on Fox going nuts, going absolutely nuts...and they go, 'Maybe I should go check this movie out.'"


Finally, Moore couldn't resist on zinger at Mickey's expense. "If you had told me when we were going through all our pre-distribution problems with Disney that this film would gross more than any other Disney film this year...I don't even know to respond to that," he said.


For his part Mouse House big cheese Michael Eisner has been gracious--perhaps because, as part of his deal with the film's producers, Disney gets to pick charities that will receive the bulk of Fahrenheit 9/11's profits. Eisner has also admitted to seeing the doc he dumped, telling the Associated Press, "The reason it is a hit is it's entertaining. I thought it was like going to a rock concert. I loved it, but not in a political ."


The White House continues to try to ignore the movie. But Moore is trying to change that. He says that he plans to make an announcement this week during the Democratic National Convention about "my attempts to get to see the movie and an offer that I plan to make to him so that he has a chance to see the movie."


Other threads on the board about Fahrenheit 9/11.........


Moore's 'Fahrenheit 9/11' Wins at Cannes.


http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-elinthenews/?msg=6602.1


Hollywood abuzz about 'Fahrenheit 9/11'.


http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-elinthenews/?msg=6725.1


violation of freedom of expression


http://messageboards.ivillage.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=iv-elinthenews&msg=6483.1

cl-Libraone~

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 4:50pm
<>



Interesting comment. Do you know for a fact that everyone who saw the movie didn't do any independent research or "thinking" as you say, or is that just a gross generalization?

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-16-2004
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 5:44pm
Independent thinking? How all the F 9/11 bashers who haven't even seen the movie and only watch right-wing TV and yet comment on the movie? Yeah, that's independent thinking. Watching a whole lot of different sources and making up one's mind after having done research, THAT's independent thinking!
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-16-2004
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 5:45pm
Or maybe he wants them to become less stupid, and actually seek information from a variety of sources?
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-03-2003
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 6:18pm
"Do you know for a fact that everyone who saw the movie didn't do any independent research or "thinking" as you say, or is that just a gross generalization?"

I'm not accusing anyone, just making a comment that NOT doing any independent thinking is stupid.

~mark~

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-03-2003
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 6:20pm
Many of the F-9/11 bashers are doing so on the basis of Moore's previous work. They've done all the research they feel they need to criticize Moore in general.

~mark~

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-03-2003
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 6:26pm
And they become less stupid by paying $7-$10 to a demagogue to be told what they should think or do? That is his stated goal with F-9/11, spreading his version of the facts and thereby getting people to vote against Bush.

So he's calling them stupid on one hand, then counting on them to see his movie and do what he wants on the other. That sound like he wants an enlightened audience? He wants people who can be led, "sheeple" is one term for them. People who are already aware of things don't need to see the movie, don't need to be led, they've already done the "independent thinking" and arrived at the necessary decisions themselves. Those aren't the people he's pandering to.

~mark~

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Mon, 07-26-2004 - 7:29pm
<>

On this we agree. Independent research or thinking is important to anyone who wishes to be informed about any topic in life. One needs to look at all sides of any issue before drawing any conclusion.

It almost goes without saying that each person will draw their own conclusions from reviewing the same information. That's what makes debate so interesting.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2003
Tue, 07-27-2004 - 11:21am
--

Still I suppose there is another way to look at it... Moore by his own admission feels most American's are stupid. Yet he's counting on those same stupid (his observation now) Americans to come see his movie and make him money.

Draw your own conclusions.

--

By your own admission a few posts ago, you feel that Americans are (Sadly) stupid as well. Again I don't see the difference, except that Moore has a long history of fighting is battles through the use of film and I will allow him that initial modicum of credibility.

I like his work and the 9/11 movies, because I love America, no other reason.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Tue, 07-27-2004 - 11:45am
Maybe, maybe not. I saw the movie but didn't take it as gospel truth anymore than I take the incredible amount of male bovine excrement that comes from the Bush administration. IMHO, Moore could have skewered Bush just fine without any kind of exaggeration or hyperbole but admittedly, it wouldn't have been as entertaining. I think if Bush was given enough rope, he could string himself up without the help of any of the Democratic candidates or their pundits. The man is a light weight figurehead who takes himself seriously. That's not the kind of leadership needed by the last remaining super power.

Gettingahandle

Ignorance is Nature's most abundant fuel for decision making.

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-02-2004
Tue, 07-27-2004 - 2:23pm
>>>Many of the F-9/11 bashers are doing so on the basis of Moore's previous work.<<

You can't honestly critisize a film based on what was done previously, those were different movies, different issues.


>>>They've done all the research they feel they need to criticize Moore in general.<<

sure they can critisize moore, but not the actual movie, unless they saw it. You haven't seen it either. I haven't seen any evidence yet to support that moore lied or distorted the facts in this movie. He used real footage and let it speak for itself and he chose the footage that best represents his opinion (sure, biased, but then doesn't everybody do that, fox sure does). Trying to insinuate that anybody who went to see it as mindless sheep is just a desperate effort to thwart others who dare venture out and explore differing points of view.