GOP can't agree on economic fix

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
GOP can't agree on economic fix
5
Fri, 01-30-2009 - 11:00am

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.gop30jan30,0,5023221.story


WASHINGTON - Don Manzullo, a House Republican from Illinois, has proposed a $5,000 voucher for anyone buying a new car. Kentucky's Mitch McConnell, the Senate GOP leader, favors a temporary suspension of the payroll tax. Jim DeMint, a Republican senator from South Carolina, wants to cut the federal income tax permanently.

As Republicans fight President Barack Obama's economic plan, they have plenty of ideas. What they don't have is a partywide consensus: They can't agree among themselves on the best alternative or whether government action is even needed to pull the economy from its nose dive.

The House passed an $819 billion version of the stimulus bill Wednesday without a single Republican voting in favor. Still, Obama and fellow Democrats hope for at least some GOP support in the Senate, where a more collaborative - and expensive - bill is taking shape. Many Republican governors, meanwhile, have begun calculating how to spend their share of any federal bailout.

"There is not a coherent Republican message at this moment," said lobbyist Vin Weber, a former GOP House member from Minnesota.




The party's scattershot stance points up two problems facing Republicans: Absent a central figure like the new president, who speaks for the GOP? And with its image in tatters, how does the party oppose Obama without seeming heedlessly partisan or ignoring voters' desire for quick action to ease the economic hurt?

For all their uncertainty, many Republicans agree on one thing. "They understand that Obama is enormously popular and resisting him is very dangerous," Weber said.

Where lawmakers stand depends greatly on where they sit.

House Republicans, who face voters every two years, typically represent ideologically cohesive and mostly conservative districts. Senators, whose terms run for six years, are chosen by a much larger electorate and have to weigh a broader set of concerns. That would explain why many Senate Republicans, while expressing concerns about the size of the stimulus package and its ratio of tax cuts to spending, have been more receptive to compromising with Obama.

It has been more than a decade since the GOP has been in such a weakened state and even longer since the party has faced a Democrat in Obama's strong political position.

"When your message is you're better than the alternative, you have to have ideas," said Brian Darling, director of Senate relations for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank.

Broadly speaking, Republicans have been making their long-standing case for smaller, less-intrusive government. They say that putting money directly into people's wallets, through tax cuts, is a better way to spur the economy than channeling money through public works and other government spending programs.

But some worry that the GOP has lost its credibility on economic issues as a result of the budget-busting policies of President George W. Bush and the financial crisis that many voters blame on his administration.

"I don't think there's very much Republicans can do on economic matters right now, other than get out of the way ... then let the chips fall where they may," said Don Sipple, a longtime GOP communications strategist. "If there's an opening down the road, or the stimulus package is a bust, that might open up some opportunities. But I think they've got to walk on eggshells for a while."

Photobucket  The WeatherPixie 

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 01-30-2009 - 11:21am
I'd be cautious too but what are the options? If used correctly this should create work & put some money in needy peoples' pockets.
Analysis: GOP gambles in opposing Obama stimulus

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ienuPb5G15bVeZ_4NwKrZ5RCpqAgD9614PN81


WASHINGTON (AP — Eight days after Barack Obama took office as a "change" president, House Republicans have made a huge political gamble that could set the tone for the next election cycle.


In unanimously opposing the massive spending bill that Obama says is crucial to reviving the economy, they signaled they are not cowed by his November win or his calls for a new era of bipartisanship. Obama's popularity will slacken, they say, and even if it doesn't voters will reward a party that makes principled stands for restrained spending and bigger tax cuts.


Democratic officials think Republicans are misreading Americans' hunger for action. And if they are right, the GOP could face a third round of election setbacks next year.


Eyebrows were raised on both sides by Wednesday night's 244-188 House vote, in which not a single Republican supported the stimulus package.


Passage was never in doubt, even when 11 Democrats joined the Republicans in voting nay. And the Democratic-controlled Congress is almost certain to enact some version of the measure soon, after senators make changes and work out the differences with the House.


Many congressional insiders, however, thought a dozen or more GOP House members would back the bill this week, especially after Obama met separately Tuesday with House and Senate Republicans in a rare presidential visit to the Capitol's two wings. The House vote makes it easier for Democrats to portray the entire Republican Party as a do-nothing, head-in-the-sand group, though GOP officials call that unfair.


"I think the Republicans have painted themselves into a box," said David DiMartino, a former Senate Democratic staffer now in public relations. "If the stimulus package works, they were wrong. For them to be right, the economy has to tank. They seem to be rooting for a bad economy."


Democratic strategists also think Republicans blundered by unanimously opposing Obama just after he made a high-profile show of bipartisanship. Not only was there his visit to the Capitol, but he agreed to drop two items from the bill that drew particular GOP fire: money to resod the National Mall in Washington and to expand family planning programs.


Republicans began pushing back Thursday. The two concessions were mighty small, they said, and Democrats ignored the GOP's alternative package that included more tax cuts and less spending, especially for programs with no obvious promise for stimulating the economy quickly.


Having Congress do nothing is not an option, "although sometimes our Democratic friends would like to present the false choice," Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., told reporters.


If a Democratic measure fails to improve the economy, Kyl said, then in about six months Republicans will "be in the position to say, 'We didn't have the input into this that we needed, and that's why it hasn't worked.'"


For now, at least, White House aides see Obama's outreach to Republicans as a win-win for him, no matter where the House and Senate votes end up. They calculate that Americans will give him credit for trying to win Republicans over, even if he fails.


Liberal groups and labor unions turned up the heat Thursday. They announced a TV ad campaign meant to pressure moderate GOP senators to back the stimulus bill. The ad, by MoveOn.org and other groups, targets Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, Charles Grassley of Iowa, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.


White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama will continue to meet with Republicans and make changes to the bill in response to their concerns. However, Gibbs suggested in an interview, GOP lawmakers will pay a political price if they ultimately stand in the bill's way.


"There will be people in districts all over the country who will wonder why, when there's a good bill to get the economy moving, why we still are playing gotcha," he said.


Both parties point to polls that they say show support for their respective viewpoints. White House chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told House Republican moderates this week that surveys find about 80 percent support for the stimulus legislation.


House GOP leaders, meanwhile, cited a poll Thursday in which most respondents said the stimulus bill is too expensive. It also found, they said, that 71 percent think it's unfair to give refund checks to people who do not pay federal income taxes.


Many low-income workers already receive some benefits through the Earned Income Tax Credit, but the stimulus bill would expand refunds to help offset payroll taxes that these workers pay.


Republicans' biggest complaint is that the package is loaded with items that they say seem more likely to promote liberal agendas than to stimulate the economy in the short run. They include $1 billion for the Census Bureau and money to combat Avian flu and help people stop smoking. (Me: We've had 8 yrs. of republican agenda so stop whinning.)


With such items being highlighted, "it's becoming an easier 'no' vote for all us," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in an interview Thursday.


Many Republican lawmakers feel they were stampeded into voting last fall for a $700 billion financial bailout measure that proved unpopular with voters and of questionable benefit, Graham said. They worry that the stimulus bill might have a similar fate.


"Who wants to own an $850 billion increase in the national debt," Graham said, "not knowing whether it will work?"

Photobucket

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 01-30-2009 - 11:36am

Photobucket

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-30-2008
Fri, 01-30-2009 - 7:15pm

There is no coherent Republican message at this point because the party needs to redefine itself.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Sun, 02-01-2009 - 9:59am

"Their way is to make life easier for big business..which does nothing for our economy

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-30-2008
Sun, 02-01-2009 - 4:23pm
I like the idea of putting together task forces todeal with issues and problems - it will create one vision instead of bipartisan bickering.