gay woman sues Florida hospital

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-22-2009
gay woman sues Florida hospital
49
Sun, 02-08-2009 - 1:39am

http://www.miamiherald.com/277/story/892447.html


Gay woman fights over hospital visitation rights in Miami court
A gay woman not allowed to visit her dying partner at Jackson Memorial Hospital in 2007 hopes a federal judge will allow her claims of emotional distress and negligence to go to trial.

As her partner of 17 years slipped into a coma, Janice Langbehn pleaded with doctors and anyone who would listen to let her into the woman's hospital room.


Eight anguishing hours passed before Langbehn would be allowed into Jackson Memorial Hospital's Ryder Trauma Center. By then, she could only say her final farewell as a priest performed the last rites on 39-year-old Lisa Marie Pond.


Jackson staffers advised Langbehn that she could not see Pond earlier because the hospital's visitation policy in cases of emergency was limited to immediate family and spouses -- not partners. In Florida, same-sex marriages or partnerships are not recognized. On Friday, two years after her partner's death, Langbehn and her attorneys were in federal court, claiming emotional distress and negligence in a suit they filed last June.


Jackson attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case on grounds that the hospital has no obligation to allow patients' visitors.


Following a hearing lasting more than an hour Friday, U.S. District Judge Adalberto Jordan said he would try to decide soon whether the case could proceed to trial. He gave no specific date.


MARRIAGE AMENDMENT


The suit is winding its way through federal court only months after voters approved the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment, which defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The statewide amendment garnered more than 62 percent of voters -- surpassing the 60 percent threshold required for ratification.


Supporters of Florida's Amendment 2 -- mostly conservatives and Christian groups -- argued it was needed to protect families and the traditional institution of marriage by promoting homes with a mom and a dad.


Opponents argued that gay and straight, unmarried Floridians risked losing domestic partner benefits, such as health insurance, hospital visitation rights and the ability to make end-of-life decisions.


NO CONSULTATION


At Friday's hearing, Langbehn's lawyers argued the case should be tried because Langbehn had the proper documentation to make medical decisions on behalf of her partner, and was not consulted about Pond's condition for hours despite seeking answers every 20 minutes.


''This is not just about same-sex couples,'' said attorney Donald Hayden, who is also representing the Langbehn family. ``This is about protecting the legal access that a parent has to see a child, or an essential loved ones right to be aware of what is going on with their loved one.''


Attorneys for Jackson argued that hospital staff did not purposely try to harm the family or cause emotional stress.


''There's just not enough there to say that these doctors intentionally tried to cause distress,'' attorney Andrew Boese told the judge.


Pond's medical problems began in February 2007 when she, Langbehn and their three adopted children were aboard a cruise ship docked in Miami. The Washington state couple and their children were on vacation.


Pond suddenly collapsed from a heart attack and was rushed to the trauma center.


Though Langbehn had documents declaring her Pond's legal guardian and giving her the medical ''power of attorney,'' Jackson officials refused to recognize her or the kids as family.


Langbehn, who still lives in Washington, was not available for comment Friday, but in a 2007 interview with The Miami Herald she said, ``Any family should have the right to hold their loved one's hand in the last moments of life, and we were denied that.''


Langbehn's supporters are livid about the hospital's actions.


''We are here to ensure that families get the respect they deserve at Jackson Memorial Hospital and to prevent Janice's tragedy from happening to anyone else,'' said Beth Littrell, an attorney for Lambda Legal, a national group that fights for the civil rights of gays. ``This family deserves to have its day in court.''

Kate


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-19-2008
Mon, 02-09-2009 - 9:12pm
If this couple was married, it would be relevant. The problem is this couple decided not to marry.
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-19-2008
Mon, 02-09-2009 - 9:18pm

I'm personally opposed to gay marriage. At the same time, I believe in honoring our law. As a result I support the rights of any couple married, straight or gay, it doesn't matter.

If this couple had married, it would have been one heck of a story. As they never did, it is a story which repeats itself all the time in states which don't recognize rights for long term partners.

This is NOT a story about gay rights, or gay couples, it is instead a cautionary tale of the reason people marry.

What happened to this couple is no different than what happens to other live ins on a regular basis.

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-04-2009
Mon, 02-09-2009 - 10:28pm
Was same-sex marriage permitted there back before the incident in the OP?

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-22-2009
Tue, 02-10-2009 - 1:00am

One nifty thing about debating (and life) is that neither of us gets to decide what's relevant to the other, hence my agreeing to disagree :)

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-22-2009
Tue, 02-10-2009 - 1:06am

~I'm personally opposed to gay marriage.~


Thank you for answering.

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-22-2009
Tue, 02-10-2009 - 1:21am

~Was same-sex marriage permitted there back before the incident in the OP?~

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-01-2008
Tue, 02-10-2009 - 8:11am

Lets try to go back in time and put this in perspective. Let's pretend that it was before 1967 in the United States and it was a racially mixed couple. Let's pretend the woman was white and the man was black. Imagine that the woman was the hospital patient and the man her beloved partner. Of course all the way until 1967 these two could not get married. The man was not allowed to be with her in her dying bed...

The marriage ban on homosexual adults is wrong, just as the ban on interracial marriage before 1967 was wrong.

This is a matter of discrimination. No one in this country should be discriminated against because of their sexual orientation, the color of their skin, their religion or how tall or short they are.

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-22-2009
Tue, 02-10-2009 - 12:51pm
Understood.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-01-2008
Tue, 02-10-2009 - 3:28pm

"If a couple is committed, demonstrate it, marry. If not, don't expect to be treated as married."

It's not her fault to not be married. Most states don't allow same sex marriages.
ALL states allow heterosexual marriages.

Pages