Oakland Passes Marijuana Tax

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Oakland Passes Marijuana Tax
16
Thu, 07-23-2009 - 10:31am

Legalise & tax all marijuana.


http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/07/22/oakland-passes-marijuana-tax/


In an attempt to ease the economic pain caused by the recession, the Oakland, Calif., City Council has passed a 1.8 percent tax on medical marijuana sold within city limits. An estimated 200,000 California residents use marijuana for medical purposes, and they already pay a state sales tax on their purchases. So how much revenue could the new tax bring to the cash-strapped city? Via The Wall Street Journal:


A city tax on medical marijuana could generate at least $400,000 and perhaps more than $1 million annually, said Rebecca Kaplan, the Oakland City Council member who pushed the proposal.


Sounds good, but that will make only a small dent in the estimated $83 million budget gap that Oakland faces for the coming year.

A bill has also been introduced in the California legislature that would levy a $50 per ounce tax on medical marijuana sold statewide. If it passes, that measure could raise as much as $1.3 billion.

Photobucket      The WeatherPixie 

 


Photobucket&nbs

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-05-2009
Fri, 07-24-2009 - 10:50pm

I guess I never paid any attention that other areas besides Texas was pummelled by Ike.


Glad everyone came through it ok.


This is O/T, but it really ticks me off!

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-04-2008
Sat, 07-25-2009 - 12:11am
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Sat, 07-25-2009 - 8:54am

"...that MEDICINAL uses of marijuana should be legalized and they wouldn't mind paying a little extra in taxes if it will help out the city of which they buy it"


I agree.


Welcome to the board. :)

Photobucket

 


Photobucket&nbs

Community Leader
Registered: 04-05-2002
Sat, 07-25-2009 - 9:29am

I don't think the issue is whether medicinal users are willing or able to pay it but that it's medicinal and I don't think we should tax that any more than taxing an epidural during pregnancy. Sure, I would have paid the moon in taxes for it but is it right? I'd rather see a tax on twinkies than a tax on medicine.


I loved living in California (lived in LA, Monterey and Alameda) and would have loved to settle there but the $800,000 for a 1000 sq foot ranch was cost prohibitive. We couldn't even CHOOSE to live there because we couldn't afford it.






iVillage Member
Registered: 03-30-2007
Sat, 07-25-2009 - 10:49am

I was taking care of a little girl when Katrina hit. She was very upset about it. I told her not to worry we don't live near an Ocean. We don't have hurricanes. Goes to show you what I know!

We had an arsonist that burned down 3 old building here. It's still sad to see where they once stood.

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-05-2009
Sat, 07-25-2009 - 11:08am

I don't think the issue is whether medicinal users are willing or able to pay it but that it's medicinal and I don't think we should tax that any more than taxing an epidural during pregnancy.


I agree.

Pages