Tax, Travel & Teabaggers

Avatar for ddnlj
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Tax, Travel & Teabaggers
14
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 8:18am
Tea Baggers Who Feel They’re ‘Taxed Enough Already’ Gripe About Inadequate Service In…Public Transit

 Last weekend, tens of thousands of right-wing protesters invaded Washington, DC for the 912 March. Not only were they rallying against President Obama’s plans for health care reform, but more generally against “socialism,” government-run services, and too much taxation.


A large number of the tea party protesters relied on DC’s transit system to get around the city. The Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (WMATA) reported that on Sept. 12, metrorail ridership was double compared to an average Saturday. The Washington metro, of course, is public transit — in other words, it’s run by big government. Nevertheless, Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) has written a letter to WMATA complaining that the service wasn’t good enough for the tea baggers:



“These individuals came all the way from Southeast Texas to protest the excessive spending and growing government intrusion by the 111th Congress and the new Obama administration,” Brady wrote. “These participants, whose tax dollars were used to create and maintain this public transit system, were frustrated and disappointed that our nation’s capital did not make a great effort to simply provide a basic level of transit for them.”


A spokesman for Brady says that “there weren’t enough cars and there weren’t enough trains.” Brady tweeted as much from the Saturday march. “METRO did not prepare for Tea Party March! More stories. People couldn’t get on, missed start of march. I will demand answers from Metro,” he wrote on Twitter.


In his letter, Brady also complained that overcrowding on the metro trains
“forced an 80-year-old woman and elderly veterans in wheelchairs to pay for cabs” — in other words, to rely on the non-government-run transportation system, which tea party protesters would presumably want to support.


A large part of the reason that the DC metro has had so many problems in recent years is that it doesn’t “have dedicated tax revenue.” It has often run into protests from people such Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), who has said that we shouldn’t “steal opportunity from our children so that we can have a ride on the Metro.” The American Public Transportation Association says that “recession-imposed limits on government budgets and increased demand are doubtless among the reasons why ‘transit systems are strained all over the country.’”


Americans around the country are relying on metro more than ever. Last year, they took 10.7 billion trips, the highest level in 52 years. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials reports that “an annual investment of $46 billion is needed to keep up with an expected 2.4 percent annual growth in ridership,” but in 2006, “transit capital from all levels of government amounted to only $13.3 billion.”


As for Brady…John Cole points out that when a bill containing $150 million for emergency maintenance funding for the DC metro system came up this summer, Brady voted against it.


It's called "public transportation" for a reason. Because the public is taxed for it.  Do these teabaggers believe buses and trains just spring from the earth for THEIR convenience?
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Pages

Community Leader
Registered: 04-05-2002
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 8:43am
Yep, they only want government involved when it directly benefits them but not if it only benefits others. I wonder how most of them would feel if they lost their jobs and their health insurance.





iVillage Member
Registered: 08-24-2009
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 8:52am
*shaking my head* Do they even realize how ridiculous they sound?
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 10:06am

Why didn't they hire their own private buses?


What a cheek to complain about lack of sufficient public transportation! Then they're accusing our Pres. of being a socialist.


I posted a piece in the international news folder about the British trains. Once upon a time the British trains ran like clockwork very efficiently. Someone had the 'great' idea of privatising them so various lines were sold off to several companies. One being Branson of Virgin airlines/records etc. Now the public is clamouring to re-nationalise the railways. I can personally testify the last time I was in England the train service was the pits thanks to the private companies lack of co-operation & not wanting to spend money for upkeep.

Photobucket

 


Photobucket&nbs

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-12-2004
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 11:12am

Can I come to their defense, a little?

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-30-2002
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 11:32am

The point you are missing is that the tea baggers want less "government interference." They don't want their tax dollars used to subsidize things for the general public. It should be every man for themself, essentially. Yet when faced with actually having to deal with that ,i.e. pay for a taxi, they are complaining about the lack of government funded public transportation.


Don't you see the irony of that?


I bet an awful lot of the 80 yo's mentioned in the article are accepting their medicare benefits as well, and not footing their own medical bills or paying for it all through private insurance.



iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 11:52am
Oh this is GOOD!
 
Avatar for ddnlj
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 11:54am
Of course. Help yourself.
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
iVillage Member
Registered: 01-04-2009
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 12:56pm

Yes. Yes they do.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-18-2000
Fri, 09-18-2009 - 2:46pm
LOL Good info.
Photobucket

 


Photobucket&nbs

Avatar for claddagh49
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-20-2004
Sat, 09-19-2009 - 9:45am
I honestly think they don't really care. They say so much that contradicts themselves it isn't even funny!

Pages