Did you see "Fahrenheit 911" ?
Find a Conversation
Did you see "Fahrenheit 911" ?
| Tue, 06-29-2004 - 1:31pm |
Did you see "Fahrenheit 911" ?
- No
- No, but I plan to
- Yes
You will be able to change your vote.
| Tue, 06-29-2004 - 1:31pm |
You will be able to change your vote.
Pages
Miffy - Co-CL For The Politics Today Board
and here is a link about enlistment requirements:
http://armedforcescareers.com/enlistmentrequirements.html
Age
Must be between the ages of 17 and 35 years. If age 17, parents' signed consent is required.
Citizenship
Miffy - Co-CL For The Politics Today Board
And, who is preaching morality to others yet not practicing what they preach? I seemed to have missed those posts. Can you point them out to me?
What points are you referring to?
<<>>
Let's get one thing straight..It isn't a documentary..even Moore himself said this...he also said that this movie was his point of view nothing more nothing less. Secondly this is the problem I have with people saying that we should be grateful when little of this movie was factual.
<<>>
Again I find this alarming that you just believe what he says instead of questioning any of it. Do you really believe that Bush sat for 7 minutes catatonic at Booker Elementary on 9/11? Do you really believe Moore's version of Bush and the Saudi's? If so then I suggest you do a little research on your own..you will be AMAZED how many inaccuracies you will find with Moore's "point of view".
<<Even the Pres and VP are
Renee ~~~
Yes, there are good things done by the american military. I'm certain of that, and I've never said otherwise. But if one complains about how Michael Moore's movie showed Iraq as peaceful before the attacks by the US, saying that it was 'biased', then one should also complain about the media's lack of coverage of how horrible it has been for Iraqis since the war. Children (who were pictured in that shot of Bagdad before the war) were not being killed and bombed before the attack. I don't see how this was misleading in any way! No one ever denied that Saddam was a horrible dictator. There's still plenty of other horrible dictators on this planet... But that doesn't change the fact that for most civilians, life got WORSE after the first bombs started dropping, and that more people were killed than before the war.
How often have you seen on the american media stories of those Iraqis families who have lost loved ones? I've seen two such stories on the american media, including that of the little boy whose entire family was killed and was himself terribly maimed. Do you hear the stories of those Iraqis who say that their life is WORSE now? Do you see the stories of those who say "go away, we never asked you to bomb us to get rid of Saddam?". But of course, the west knows better about what's best for them. How paternalistic! The French and the British should have also attacked the US to put an end to slavery, or to impose civil rights to the US, when it was 'way behind' every other western country??? Remember, the US did not meet its own CURRENT requirements for what constitutes a democracy until 1964. That wasn't such a long time ago, in my book.
What the heck are you talking about??????
Pages