Did you see "Fahrenheit 911" ?
Find a Conversation
Did you see "Fahrenheit 911" ?
| Tue, 06-29-2004 - 1:31pm |
Did you see "Fahrenheit 911" ?
- No
- No, but I plan to
- Yes
You will be able to change your vote.
| Tue, 06-29-2004 - 1:31pm |
You will be able to change your vote.
Pages
Telling someone to formulate their own thoughts, as if you are sure they don't already do that is insulting.
Using phrases like "claims to know" or "too much to ask" is insulting.
I don't see any difference between winning arguments and having your POV challenged.
Calling someone a liar when they believe their point of view is the truth is insulting. You could try to explain why you believe differently, without attacking.
Failing to recognize differences of interpretation & philosophy as the reason for different conclusions is insulting. You could try to detail how you reached your conclusions instead.
Your general tone is insulting. You don't present your case well using this approach.
"From your post, I now understand that whatever I say, explain or elaborate on, is sómehow insulting in your observations.... "
LOL, you haven't answered the question, you don't have an answer. You have given me, and others, the same run around everytime. Thanks for making my point!
We, the American people, were told that Iraq had WMD and were an imminent threat (I believe imminent means soon - so I'm not certain why you took such offense at that)
You stated that "from the very start the invasion of Iraq has consisted of Several missions". If you're done being insulting, could you please share the other missions - the other reasons we attacked Iraq.
I'd really like to know, and I've certainly never heard or read about them anywhere else.
Okay, All the reasons we went to war with Iraq are? (not including the false or mistaken insistence that Iraq had WMD)
Oops, this message is meant for DJIE (smiliey faces)
Edited 9/25/2004 12:14 pm ET ET by righton2004
Does it bother me that the President was stunned at the occurrances on that day, Heck no! Imagine if he looked as though he was expecting it, what would your arguement be then?
Could he have prevented the Pentagon from being hit? I'm sure if time allowed, and my understanding of the time was that it didn't, he could have had that plane shot down. but where? That would have meant following with the plane and shooting it down where the least amount of civilians would have been killed on the ground. Quite a call to make, IF, and that is a big IF, it could be made. I honestly don't understand how so many people are so sure the President acted in less than an authoritarian manner, yet not one person has a clue what he did wrong. Talk about showing your true colors and biases.
Pages