Mrs. John Kerry -Is this true?
Find a Conversation
| Mon, 07-12-2004 - 11:58am |
" To mention just a few, they support the "Barrio Warriors," a radical
Hispanic group whose primary goal is to return all of Arizona,
California, New Mexico and Texas to Mexico..." but read on, please!
Following is a brief backround on Mrs. John Kerry . She hates being
called that, by the way:
Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry. Married Senator
Kerry in 1995. She only took his name eighteen months ago and she is an
"interesting" paradox of conflicts.
If you thought John Kerry was scary, he doesn't hold a candle to
his wife! Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry was born in
Mozambique, the daughter of a Portuguese physician, was educated in
Switzerland and South Africa. Fluent in five languages, she was working
as a United Nations interpreter in Geneva in the mid-60's when she met a
"handsome" young American, H. John Heinz, III, who worked at a bank in
Geneva. He told her his family was "in the food business."
They were married in 1966 and returned to Pittsburgh where his
family ran the giant H. J. Heinz food company. He was elected to the US
House of Representatives in 1971, and in 1976 he was elected to the
first of three terms in the United States Senate. A Republican, he wrote
a burning diatribe against some of the causes backed by young House
member John Kerry.)
Several years later, in 1991, he was killed when his plane collided
with a Sun Oil Company helicopter over a Philadelphia suburb. The
senator, his pilot and copilot, and both of Sun's helicopter pilots were
killed. He was survived by his wife, Teresa, and their three young sons.
Four years later, having inherited Heinz's $500 million fortune,
she married Senator John Forbes Kerry, the liberal then-junior senator
from Massachusetts. She became a registered Democrat and the process of
her radicalization was set in motion.
Heinz Kerry is not shy about telling people that she required Kerry
to sign a prenuptial agreement before they were married. John Kerry may
not have check writing privileges on the Heinz catsup and pickle
fortune, but he is certainly a willing and uncomplaining beneficiary of it.
A lot of hard-earned money, made through many years of hawking
catsup, mustard, and pickles has fallen into the hands of two people who
despise successful entrepreneurship and who believe in the confiscatory
redistribution of wealth.
So how does Mrs. Heinz Kerry spend John Heinz's money?
Just one example:
According to the G2 Bulletin, an online intelligence newsletter of
WorldNetDaily, in the years between 1995-2001 she gave more than $4
million to an organization called the Tides Foundation. And what does
the Tides Foundation do with John Heinz's money?
They support numerous antiwar groups, including Ramsey Clark's
International Action Center. Clark has offered to defend Saddam Hussein
when he's tried.
They support the Democratic Justice Fund, a joint venture of the
Tides Foundation and billionaire hate-monger George Soros. The
Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration
from "terrorist" states.
They support the Council for American-Islamic Relations, whose
leaders are known to have close ties to the terrorist group, Hamas.
They support the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist
front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart,
has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman,
communicate with terror cells in Egypt. He is the convicted mastermind
of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
They support the "Barrio Warriors," a radical Hispanic group whose
primary goal is to return all of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and
Texas to Mexico.
These are but a few of the radical groups that benefit, through the
anonymity provided by the Tides Foundation, from the generosity of our
would-be first lady, the wealthy widow of Republican senator John Heinz,
and now the wife of the Democratic senator who aspires to be the 44th
President of the United States.
Aiding and supporting our enemies is not good for America,
regardless of your political views.
If voters will open their eyes, educate themselves and see the real
Teresa Heinz Kerry, they will not appreciate her position as ultra rich
fairy godmother of the radical left. They will not want to imagine her
laying her head on a pillow each night inches away from the President of
the United States.
Hopefully they love this country enough to decide that the only way
these two will ever be allowed into the White House is with an engraved
invitation in hand.
Instead of deleting this, pass it on. Let everyone know these
people may be unfit to represent this great nation. The uninformed will
never hear the truth from the press, who want Kerry elected!
Those who buy the Kerry facade, beware of what you vote for - - - you
may regret what you get!

Pages
Yes, it seems some only like strong women as first ladies if they are Democrats-Nancy Reagan was crucified for being too outspoken and involved, and her husband was criticized for relying on her for advice. Now those same folks are praising the strong, outspoken Mrs. Kerry and saying Republicans don't like strong women.
My philosophy is that ALL people are potentially abusive, as well as potentially caring and wonderful.
let me go a bit further to explain what a great person I am.;) (LOL)
We supervise visits and meet a lot of parents at my job, and these parents are separated from their kids due to abuse accusations. soem of them are founded, and some are not. A lot of people I work with are very judgemental. They say "I would never let my 8 year old stay in the house alone while I went to work" or "I would never stay with my uhsband if he hit our kids, or hit me." and My replly is to tell them to thank God they are not in the situation where they would have to face that decision. and a lot of people are more stuck in the problem due to being poor. My attitude is that most people don't want to be abusive, it is brought about by circumstances and environment, and it could be anybody. In other words, There, but for the grace of God, go I.
and I mean it. If I thought only men were potential abusers, I would be a lesbian.
Hey
Miffy - Co-CL For The Politics Today Board
I think we should all stick to debating facts rather than interpretations of behaviours. Unless some of us are psychologist..
I think the comment about Kerry seeking affection from Edwards was meant to be somewhat tongue in cheek. Personally though I don't much care what kind of relationship the Kerrys have unless it affects his job performance or ends up with him perjuring himself over it. ;) I do think that the criticism of Mrs. Kerry's persona is rather irrelevant, but questioning where she chooses to donate her money is valid.
I agree.
<<Saying how kerry even 'seeks affection' from Edwards? Come on! >>
Come on!
You knew I was having fun with that and wasn't accusing Kerry of infidelity or homosexuality.
I will, however,
Renee ~~~
http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/tides.asp
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/t/teresakerry.htm
~Libraone~
http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-elinthenews/
Edited 7/16/2004 12:33 pm ET ET by libraone
ITA. I’m just waiting (as usual with the weak leftist theology) for a woman to be president. Just let stories come out that her husband has input in her decisions and you’ll hear NOW and the likes howl that he’s being a “overbearing man” and is “controlling” her while they point out that it was the woman that was elected, not him.
In my mind, I’m certain this would happen. This double standard is why I can’t vote liberal anymore.
Pages