Bush supporters give me a break!
Find a Conversation
| Wed, 08-04-2004 - 2:17pm |
I truly feel like whenever I hear a Bush supporter speak, it is like listening to someone with Stolkholm syndrome, THEY ARE COMPLETELY BRAINWASHED!!! I mean, honestly, unless you are living in a cave (without internet, mind you) there is no way that the Bush supporters do not intake the same news that I do.
HE LIED!!! HE LIED!!! Let this serve as a newsflash to anyone who did not know. THERE ARE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. IF THERE ARE, HIS DAD SUPPLIED THEM. This is something that they were aware of befor the sent us into Iraq. That is unethical manipulation of your position of power.
For those of you who were just about to argue that we went in for "humanitarian" reasons to collapse the tyranical reign of Saddam, let me just halt you in your tracks. Why are we not in any country in Africa, in which there are civil wars, AIDs epidemics, and feminist repression running rampant due to governmental proceedings? Why are we not in China? Why are we not in Palestine (oh wait, I forgot, we are, sponsering their killing by the Israelis)? Becaus they do not benefit us? So what's the deal, we fight for humanity contigent on how much money we gain from it? Give me a break!
I read another posting about how Republicans are frustrated with the Democrats focus on how George Bush cannot speak. A couple interesting points: It worries us that he cannot speak because you'd think that after a couple years at Yale, the University rated number one on the recently released Princenton Review, that he would be able to process a few words. I guess the fact that he graduated with like a D average just does not count. Additionally, I would just like to call to attention the fact that over and over again science has come to the conclusion that the major difference between humans and the animal kingdom is our ability to speak, and our advanced methods of communication which in turn lead to organization and technology, thus the advancement of the human race. If he cannot speak, then he is getting closer and closer to the animal, right?
Finally, on the GOP thread several posters commented on how although Dems were calling them nervous, they were actually unwaveringly confident. Yeah, I would be too if my party had just rigged the last election!!
People, women, get to the polls!!
Let's make it like father, like son, one term!
Lani

Pages
Yup, page 66 of the 9/11 report 3rd paragraph down which reads ...
"Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aids may have occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban. According to the reporting, Iraqui officials offered Bil Ladin a safe haven in Iraq. Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan remained more favorable than the Iraqui alternative."
That help?
Did it ever cross your mind that they are not hating us because they do not understand us and want to destroy our way of life, but simply because they truly understand our foreign policies, just as much of the rest of the world, outside of Americans like yourself, do.
Don't put so much faith in government, they are not that true blue, we did not invade for such theortical reasons. It had more to do with oil
~mark~
You have confused Pakastani with Palestinian. Which is the part of the joke you're not getting :-)
Additionally, my arguement is that if a MAJORITY OF AMERICANS regardless of state, want someone to be president, then it should be so.
Is this that abstract of a concept?
I understand the electoral college and its orginal purpose, but as an American who wants my democracy, It has clearly become obsolete.
"Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aids may have occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban. According to the reporting, Iraqui officials offered Bil Ladin a safe haven in Iraq. Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan remained more favorable than the Iraqui alternative."
That help?
--
Naw, not really. Nothing rock hard about it. I imagine if there was more than a grain of truth to it, we'd have heard it from Bush/Rice/Powell by now.
The keyword: MAY
But hey, it's good ammo :)
Cheers
Dont call me dear . . .
--
She called me Honey.
Let's triple date!
"If you want to talk about competing loyalties and interests, why don't you look at us?"
You're right, as I have not and would not disagree with on that.
~mark~
Pages