Bush exploits Olympics, violates rules

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
Bush exploits Olympics, violates rules
14
Sun, 08-22-2004 - 3:23am
ATHENS, Greece - Iraqi soccer players reacted angrily Friday after being told that their nation's Olympic participation was mentioned in TV commercial by the re-election campaign for President Bush.

The players called on Bush to stop using them to win votes in the United States.

“Iraq as a team does not want Mr. Bush to use us for the presidential campaign,” midfielder Salih Sadir was quoted as saying. “He can find another way to advertise himself.”

Another Iraqi player asked: “How will (Bush) meet his God having slaughtered so many men and women? He has committed so many crimes.”

Hamd said, “The American army has killed so many people in Iraq. What is freedom when I go to the stadium and there are shootings on the road?”

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
Sun, 08-22-2004 - 3:25am
Bush campaign won't stop running Olympics ad despite request from U.S. organizing committee

Friday, August 20, 2004

(08-20) 15:45 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

President Bush's re-election campaign will continue to run a television ad that mentions the Olympics by name, despite objections from the U.S. Olympic Committee, a spokesman said Friday.

"We are on firm legal ground to mention the Olympics and make a factual point in a political advertisement," said Scott Stanzel.

USOC officials had protested that federal law gives them the exclusive rights to the name.

The ad shows a swimmer and the flags of Iraq and Afghanistan.

"In 1972, there were 40 democracies in the world. Today, 120," an announcer says. "Freedom is spreading throughout the world like a sunrise. And this Olympics there will be two more free nations. And two fewer terrorist regimes."

Bush campaign aides contend that the law in question gives the committee exclusive rights only to use the Olympics name to sell goods or services or to promote athletic competition. The campaign avoided using the symbol of five rings in the ad, the aides said.

Stanzel said the ad will continue to run for the last two weeks of August.

Meanwhile, Bush is watching the competition on television.

"The president has been following the Olympics and pulling for all of our American athletes," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Friday in Texas, where Bush is staying at his ranch.

"He is keeping a close eye on team USA and watching it when he can," the spokesman said.

As for the TV ad, Darryl Seibel, a spokesman for the U.S. Olympic Committee, said the organization had contacted the Bush campaign.

"We haven't actually seen the ad as we're here in Greece. We're aware of it," he said "We contacted the re-election campaign and we are awaiting a reply."

Some of the players on the Iraqi Olympic soccer team have complained about the ads.

The brand and concept of the Olympics belong to the International Olympic Committee in general and to the USOC in the United States.

An act of Congress, last revised in 1999, grants the USOC exclusive rights to such terms as "Olympic," derivatives such as "Olympiad" and the five interlocking rings. It also specifically says the organization "shall be nonpolitical and may not promote the candidacy of an individual seeking public office."

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-28-2003
Mon, 08-23-2004 - 12:04pm
I believe the Drudge Report is saying Bush is secretly planning to attend the Olympics, wrap himself in the flag and patriotism, a few photo ops, etc. When you have no record to stand on, and stand for nothing, you need all those photo ops. Especially before your convention.

I think he'd best stay home and work on his speech. Can't believe the Secret Service would go for this. Nor do I believe Greece can afford to pay for all the security, such as Ireland did for Bush's earlier visit.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-22-2003
Mon, 08-23-2004 - 2:58pm
I also heard one of the player said he would retire from sports and join the force in Iraq to fight against US occupancy of Iraq. I hope this opens the eyes of those who think Iraqi's are happy now.
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Mon, 08-23-2004 - 3:35pm
Re the soccer player at the Olympics: Isn't it wonderful that he can speak out freely, knowing he won't be tortured and/or killed by butcher Uday Hussein on his return to Iraq?

Have a read on al-Samarrai (who runs the Iraqi

Djie

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-22-2003
Wed, 08-25-2004 - 12:03pm
Looks like you always miss the point of the post and go tangent.


Edited 8/25/2004 12:04 pm ET ET by palak
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Wed, 08-25-2004 - 12:46pm
???....You say: <<"I also heard one of the player said he would retire from sports and join the force in Iraq to fight against US occupancy of Iraq. I hope this opens the eyes of those who think Iraqi's are happy now.>>

I respond that it's "wonderful that he can speak out freely, knowing he won't be tortured and/or killed by butcher Uday Hussein on his return to Iraq?", and provide you with a link to an article describing the "before-and-after-the-ousting-of-the-hussein-regime".

In other words, if he (pre-ousting-SH-regime) would have said: "I would retire from sports and join the opposition of the SH-regime", he wouldn't have survived the well described "homecoming-party".

Djie

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-22-2003
Wed, 08-25-2004 - 2:12pm
So is US going to compare itself with SH regime. Is that the threshold of morality? Just because his ears won't get cuttoff doesnot mean that everything is hunky dory in Iraq.


Edited 8/25/2004 2:15 pm ET ET by palak
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Thu, 08-26-2004 - 3:25pm
Nów who is missing the point?

I compared the Iraq under SH-rule to the Iraq áfter SH-rule was ended.

NO one is saying <<"everything is hunky dory in Iraq">>, but if you can't see the progress that is made every day DESPITE all the agony and what-have-you the Iraqi people are going through, what can I say?

Djie

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Fri, 08-27-2004 - 11:55am
You should take into account that there are those in Iraq that still support Hussein, as they lived a very comfortable life when he was in control.
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-24-2004
Sat, 08-28-2004 - 7:10am
I guess the coach and players themselves don't know any better do they? The coach and a player specifically said:

"But members of the very successful Iraqi Olympic soccer team beg to differ, blasting Bush's attempt to use their participation in the Games as justification for the US occupation of their country. "My problems are not with the American people," Iraq's soccer coach, Adnan Hamad Majeed, told the Associated Press. "They are with what America has done in Iraq: destroy everything. The American Army has killed so many people in Iraq." His star midfielder, Salih Sadir, agreed: "Iraq as a team doesn't want Mr. Bush to use us for the presidential campaign.... We don't wish for the presence of the Americans in our country. We want them to go away.

These are not anonymous bomb throwers sending notes to the media. These are Iraq's favorite sons, stars of the national sport. Yet they all seem to be saying the same thing: America's military is not wanted on our land. Another team member, Ahmed Manajid, demanded to know: "How will meet his God having slaughtered so many men and women? He has committed so many crimes." The athlete added that were he not playing for his country he would "for sure" be fighting in the Iraqi resistance. "I want to defend my home. If a stranger invades America and the people resist, does that mean they are terrorists?" Manajid asked. "

Yes the fact that they can speak out freely is wonderful, but is anyone listening to what they are speaking about? Now they have the voice to speak, we have to use our ears and listen. While they are not being tortured, they do have the constant mindframe that at any time they may be killed either by the U.S. army or by rising insurgents. Is this any better???


Iraqi Olympic Soccer Players Kick the Stuffing Out of Bush's Fantasy

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040830&s=scheer0824



With just seventy days until Election Day, the race for the presidency has gone from bitter to outright poisonous: John Kerry is faulted in television ads by President Bush's moneyed allies for winning combat medals in a war that Bush avoided, then slammed by the same hypocrites for having the courage to criticize that war after his return as a wounded vet.

Meanwhile, Bush pretends to be above the fray, all the while parading as a war commander and boasting, bizarrely, about his mythical achievements in the invasion of Iraq. That war, like Vietnam, has been a costly disaster since its inception. In an eerie echo of previous Presidents who knowingly lied us into the Vietnam horror, always affirming that victory was "just around the corner," Bush's latest campaign ads prematurely declare Afghanistan and Iraq as the world's newest democracies. According to the implicit logic of one ad, the proof can be found in the fact that they both sent teams to the Olympics.


ADVERTISEMENT Never mind that both countries are racked by insurgencies and warlordism and dependent on US troops for what passes for security. Forget that both countries are under martial law and their leaders are unelected US appointees. Cover your eyes to the fact that both countries are squalid economic basket cases, with the vast majority of the populace unemployed--or, in the case of Afghanistan, cultivating opium poppies. Ignore the facts. They're democracies because George W. Bush says so.

But members of the very successful Iraqi Olympic soccer team beg to differ, blasting Bush's attempt to use their participation in the Games as justification for the US occupation of their country. "My problems are not with the American people," Iraq's soccer coach, Adnan Hamad Majeed, told the Associated Press. "They are with what America has done in Iraq: destroy everything. The American Army has killed so many people in Iraq." His star midfielder, Salih Sadir, agreed: "Iraq as a team doesn't want Mr. Bush to use us for the presidential campaign.... We don't wish for the presence of the Americans in our country. We want them to go away."

These are not anonymous bomb throwers sending notes to the media. These are Iraq's favorite sons, stars of the national sport. Yet they all seem to be saying the same thing: America's military is not wanted on our land. Another team member, Ahmed Manajid, demanded to know: "How will meet his God having slaughtered so many men and women? He has committed so many crimes." The athlete added that were he not playing for his country he would "for sure" be fighting in the Iraqi resistance. "I want to defend my home. If a stranger invades America and the people resist, does that mean they are terrorists?" Manajid asked.

That is a legitimate question that no one in the Bush Administration and few in Congress want to grapple with. And yet we wonder why, fifteen months after the United States "liberated" Iraq, are there so many people there who hate us?

The honest answer would be similar to the one once offered by Vietnam vet and now-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell to explain the failure of the US occupation of South Vietnam: "We had been sent to pursue a policy that had become bankrupt," Powell wrote in his autobiography. "Our political leaders had led us into a war for the one-size-fits-all rationale of anti-communism, which was only a partial fit in Vietnam, where the war had its own historical roots in nationalism, anti-colonialism and civil strife beyond the East-West conflict."

The only essential difference between Powell's remarks and the 1971 remarks by Kerry that Bush supporters cite in their ugly smear campaign is that Powell's dissent came twenty years too late to stop the carnage. Those who attack Kerry for speaking out in 1971 against the Vietnam War don't understand that it was an enormous public service for returning American veterans to expose the cynicism of their leaders, as Kerry did in testifying before the US Senate.

The young Kerry was speaking truth to power, facing a reality that presidents Richard Nixon and Lyndon B. Johnson had admitted in private, as records made public later revealed. In private White House tapes, Johnson made it clear he could never justify the death of a single US soldier in Vietnam.

His successor, knowing the war was unwinnable, nevertheless carpet-bombed the region in order to fend off an inevitable defeat until after his re-election campaign.

In the end, who better than veterans to speak out when our commander in chief has betrayed the trust of US troops, sending them to kill and be killed in an unnecessary war?

Pages