For cl-wrhen

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-20-2003
For cl-wrhen
18
Sat, 09-04-2004 - 5:14pm
I'm still waiting for you to answer my question from yesterday.

Since you are up to answering questions I've posed to others today, I ask you

If electing Sen. Kerry sends a message of weakness to the terrorists, what message did George Bush send to these terrorists when he admitted on TV he could not win the war on terror?

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-17-2004
In reply to: blueishxx
Sat, 09-04-2004 - 7:29pm

Yeah, what she said.


(Just thought I'd save you the trouble of calling me out personally again.)

Renee ~~~

Renee ~~~

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-20-2003
In reply to: blueishxx
Sat, 09-04-2004 - 7:47pm
If you truly wanted to spare me effort, you would have answered this question yesterday when I first posed it.

As it stands now, you have not directly answered my question.

I see you have no intention of doing so.
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-05-2004
In reply to: blueishxx
Sat, 09-04-2004 - 7:51pm
It seems like she answered it to me. It's clear when you take what our president said in context that he didn't mean it the way it sounds when it's out of context. He's made his stance pretty clear on terrorism. I don't think the terrorists have been fooled in the least. They know only too well what they are up against.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-12-2001
In reply to: blueishxx
Sat, 09-04-2004 - 7:56pm
"As it stands now, you have not directly answered my question.

I see you have no intention of doing so."


O-bla-di, o-bla-dah ........

girl in chair
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-17-2004
In reply to: blueishxx
Sun, 09-05-2004 - 11:07am

There are many people on this board perfectly capable of and willing to answer your questions besides me. If someone does, that's your answer.

Renee ~~~

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-20-2003
In reply to: blueishxx
Sun, 09-05-2004 - 12:50pm
Thank you for your reply.

I realize that this board is often like an interstate.

Posters rush back and forth, often taking little notice of those in the opposing lane.

The sheer volume of 'traffic' on this board makes it impossible for any human being to respond to every point or question raised.

Some simply choose not to respond to points raised or questions posed.

That is their prerogative.

I understand and appreciate that.

In the original thread I posed a question inviting responses from anyone.

You chose to responded to my original question with another question.

I'm paraphrasing, 'since when did your side care what al quada or saddam hussein thinks?'

It appeared to me as an oblique attempt to discredit a questioner without addressing the question posed.

I subsequently requested a direct answer since you chose to respond to my original, open question with innuendo.

I hope I've now made myself better understood.

I am now dropping this matter out of consideration for the rest of the board who have other things they would rather be reading about right now.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-24-2004
In reply to: blueishxx
Sun, 09-05-2004 - 2:38pm
Anyone with any modicum of intelligence knows that Bush menat that the war on terror could not be won in the sense of winning a conventional war such as WWII.
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-17-2004
In reply to: blueishxx
Mon, 09-06-2004 - 11:42pm

FYI:


Since becoming co-CL,

Renee ~~~

Pages