For cl-wrhen
Find a Conversation
For cl-wrhen
| Sat, 09-04-2004 - 5:14pm |
I'm still waiting for you to answer my question from yesterday.
Since you are up to answering questions I've posed to others today, I ask you
Since you are up to answering questions I've posed to others today, I ask you
If electing Sen. Kerry sends a message of weakness to the terrorists, what message did George Bush send to these terrorists when he admitted on TV he could not win the war on terror?

Pages
Yeah, what she said.
(Just thought I'd save you the trouble of calling me out personally again.)
Renee ~~~
Renee ~~~
As it stands now, you have not directly answered my question.
I see you have no intention of doing so.
I see you have no intention of doing so."
O-bla-di, o-bla-dah ........
There are many people on this board perfectly capable of and willing to answer your questions besides me. If someone does, that's your answer.
Renee ~~~
I realize that this board is often like an interstate.
Posters rush back and forth, often taking little notice of those in the opposing lane.
The sheer volume of 'traffic' on this board makes it impossible for any human being to respond to every point or question raised.
Some simply choose not to respond to points raised or questions posed.
That is their prerogative.
I understand and appreciate that.
In the original thread I posed a question inviting responses from anyone.
You chose to responded to my original question with another question.
I'm paraphrasing, 'since when did your side care what al quada or saddam hussein thinks?'
It appeared to me as an oblique attempt to discredit a questioner without addressing the question posed.
I subsequently requested a direct answer since you chose to respond to my original, open question with innuendo.
I hope I've now made myself better understood.
I am now dropping this matter out of consideration for the rest of the board who have other things they would rather be reading about right now.
FYI:
Since becoming co-CL,
Renee ~~~
Pages