Hillary Clinton and Muslims

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-11-2003
Hillary Clinton and Muslims
27
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 1:32am
When Abdurahman Alamoudi, friend and sometime adviser on Islamic affairs to Hillary Rodham Clinton, stood before a Muslim crowd in Lafayette Park across from the White House this week and passionately declared his support for the terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, he was revealing the true face of "moderate" Islam. He was also revealing the blindness, or rather the willful complicity, of America's political elites, particularly the Clintons, who have welcomed these Islamic "moderates" into our midst and helped raise them to important positions of influence in American life.



iVillage Member
Registered: 04-04-2003
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 2:32pm
You are correct we haven't corresponded before. You are a very recent addition to these boards (welcome by the way) and for the past week or more I haven't posted anything here though I have gone through most of the threads and read them.

The reason I haven't posted here in the past little while is that I have found that the tone of the posts overall are becomming more inflammatory and intolerant and frankly it's giving me a headache. Almost all of the arguments (regardless of the title of the threads) end up discussing the same thing and I've gone that circular route ad nauseum.

<>

I have never said at ANY point that your sources were untrue and just to get nit-picky, there was no evidence of any source in your "pseudo-rebuttal" that I was responding to. It wasn't my intention to rebutt anything you've written (I actually don't see a point in it). In fact, if you were to read my post carefully you would see that I partly agree with you because I said "hatred and intolerance is a poor platform for anyone". This goes both ways - Democrats and Republicans or whatever. My post was anything but childish. To my mind one example of childishness is bringing up another poster's name (who hasn't even contributed to this particular thread) and gossiping about them behind their back. I'm also curious (since you mentioned my emotional response)....do you think that all of your posts are bereft of emotion?

Nothing will bring me out of lurk mode faster than a person who does not practice what they preach.

How'd I do this time? Do I get better marks in the "attempted condescension" department? I've always been one to try and improve my grades.

;o)

Oh and you could put me into "IgnoreLand" if you wish but I'm not too sure how mature that would be either.







Edited 9/8/2004 2:36 pm ET ET by suemox

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 2:39pm
First, I disagree that you have "proved" these allegations against Kerry. If he was a deserter & a traitor, why wasn't he brought up on formal charges?

I understand, even tho I do not agree with you, why you think Kerry is a liar & a traitor. I don't understand why you think of him as a deserter???


iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 2:49pm
Didnt this happen several years ago????
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-24-2004
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 3:50pm
Precisely the point I made earlier. This happend 4 years ago, and since that point in time there was an idictment, an arrest, an admission of guilt, and this person has a common friend with Bush. So if we are going to go thru the list of friends of the former president, it would be a nice colorful list of friends that the current president has as well.
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2003
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 4:20pm
No need to bring him up on formal charges, he'd probably assert the statute of limitations would be up and the Rather-heads satisfied. Loss of the election by Kerry will satisfy me.

Here's proof of his lying desertion and treason (hint look carefully at the dates) -- from Kerry's own words and record:

(How many times do I have to post this?)

*********************************************

On December 11, 1968, John Kerry wrote in his journal:

"They pulled away from the pier at Cat Lo with spirits high, feeling satisfied with the way things were going for them. They had no lust for battle, but they also were were not afraid. A cocky feeling of invincibility accompanied us up the Long Tau shipping channel because we hadn't been shot at yet, and Americans at war who haven't been shot at are allowed to be cocky."

From Kerry's service record:

December 2, 1968: Kerry experiences first intense combat; receives first combat related injury.

*****

Kerry lied in his self-reported first purple heart. He lied in order to tally 3 purple hearts to get out early. His tour with Jan Fonda caused grief and suffering to his imprisoned comrades and gave support to this country's enemies.

Kerry is a liar, deserter, and a traitor.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2003
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 4:22pm
Kerry was a DESERTER IN TIME OF WAR, lying about his 1st purple heart to get out early.

That's a capital offense.

I'll still settle for his withdrawal and/or humiliating defeat on Nov. 2.

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-11-2003
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 5:56pm
I agree, Kerry lies about everything.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 6:14pm
I see nothing about desertion, what exactly are you referring to? You dont need to keep repeating all the other stuff, I understand your position. I'm trying to understand where desertion is involved.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 10:03pm
Can anyone tell me the name of this Muslim man Bush is holding hands with?

http://www.nyu.edu/globalbeat/jpg/bush-saudi.jpg
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 10:13pm
Do you also believe that Kerry's records should be up for debate? I'm wondering how many people, on both sides, don't want their candidates records discussed, but are willing to discuss the opponents.
NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting