BUSH IS EVIL

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-20-2004
BUSH IS EVIL
247
Wed, 09-08-2004 - 10:51am
After reading all these posts, its seems fruitless to even argue with eachother. Bush is just plain evil. That's it. He will be remembered in 100 years (if he doesn't destroy the world before then) as a terrible person, like Pinnochet, Stalin, etc. There is no arguing. He is causing misery and heartache to too many people to ignore this fact.

Bush just wants to start a holy war. And the fundamentalist Muslims want to keep him in power so the war can begin.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-02-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 2:28pm
Hey Nisa77, I found a site, that is linked to kerrygear.com, that has Bush, chaney and rumsfield on it and it says ASS'S OF MASS DESTRUCTION, I bought one for all my friends and family members, can't wait to wear it! Thought you might like one too.
iVillage Member
Registered: 09-02-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 2:52pm
nisa77 the link is cafepress.com for the shirts.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-20-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 3:02pm


Not to knit-pick but I thought you should probably know that the North-South conflict in Sudan (Muslim-Christian) has actually reached a peace agreement. What we are now dealing with the Darfur region is the slaughter of Muslims by other Muslims (majority Arab against Black).

Although it really shouldn't matter what race, ethnicity, gender, etc. It's terrible when genocide occurs period. You are right, we should focus our energies on stopping the mass destruction of people, not escalating things to the level of violence as Bush has done in Iraq. In fact, it is safe to say that the Bush Administration is single-handedly responsible for the surge of extremist activity in Iraq. Saddam was a secular ruler. He was a giant prick to be sure but he was not an Islamist.




iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2003
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 4:06pm
So let John Kerry run for President of the World....
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-20-2003
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 4:15pm
You find humour in the fact that Bush has damaged the United States of America's image and reputation worldwide for an unnecessary invasion and occupation that has cost thousands and thousands of lives.



Yup...funny stuff.

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-05-2003
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 4:27pm
What I find humorous is the arrogance of some people....I can recall when the country of Austria just had to have a scumbag like Kurt Waldheim as its ruler, their cry was "It's our country!!!"
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 8:01pm
Aw, too bad you can't reveal your sources. We so like links here. Wouldn't it be nice if there was some way to verify these statements? I wonder why these people felt it was Ok to reveal this information to you? You must be somebody really important then, huh?



I heard somewhere else, & online too, altho it was a while ago, that Saddam hated Muslim fundamentalists. Seems our info is in direct contractidiction. But I hold my info to be more reliable since it didn't come from unnamed sources.

< I didn't say I thought Saddam was "more important" than bin Laden. But I'm glad he is gone. And I've talked to enough people who have worked in an intelligence capacity to know that he DID harbor terrorists (including Al Qaeda) and that he DID pose an imminent threat to our country. Of course, since my sources worked in a confidential capacity, I can't divulge them. But, you will believe what you wish anyway, and I will take the word of those I trust and know to be telling the truth.

Bev >

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-23-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 8:04pm


Why do some people continually forget that WE didn't start the war?

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-07-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 8:08pm
I believe it is Bush & his supporters that prefer simple black & white answers to complex world problems. Every time Kerry gives a complex answer to a complex question, they try to take it apart as if intelligence is to be avoided. I prefer brains myself.

Bush said in September 2001, "This crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take awhile." He offended Muslim people all over the world with that comment.


< Despite Bush's supposed "Christian fundamentalism" for which secular liberals love to rake him over the coals, we did NOT invade Iraq due to a hatred of Islam, real or perceived. Osama's attack on America may have been in part due to his hatred of Christianity, but that is nowhere near the entire motivation for 9/11. I'm amazed there are apparently still people who see it in such simplistic, black-and-white terms.

Bev >

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-23-2004
In reply to: nisa77
Thu, 09-09-2004 - 8:22pm

- FLAG DESECRATION: For more than a decade, the Citizen's Flag Alliance and others have expended seemingly endless resources lobbying candidates and members of Congress to pass a constitutional amendment giving the government the power to prohibit the physical desecration of the American flag. Such a constitutional amendment would undermine the very principles for which the American flag stands. >

Burning a flag is not speech. I do have to wonder, though, why you object to the free speech of those lobbying AGAINST flag burning. I suppose only those who hate this country have a right to free speech, not those who love it.

< THE RIGHT TO PROTEST - Can you imagine participants of the Boston Tea Party having to ask the British government's permission to protest them? That's what the Bush Administration has been doing to peaceful protestors around the country, especially recently in New York.>

No one needs the Bush administration's permission to protest-they need a permit from the city, the same way George Bush would need one if he wanted to hold a public gathering. You have a vivid imagination.

< GOVERNMENT FUNDED RELIGION (what ever happened to a separation between Church and State?) - Earlier this month the Senate made clear that it would not allow federally funded religious discrimination. Despite this, the Bush Administration and several Members of Congress continue to promote religious discrimination with taxpayer funds. Their most recent legislative attempt would roll-back key civil rights protections and will soon be considered on the Senate floor.>

The only religious discrimination going on is at the hands of the ACLU-the constitution's ban on a state sponsored religion was intended to promote religious freedom, not eliminate religious expression.



Which John Kerry voted in favor of (I mean, before he was against it).

Pages