Why is Kerry hiding his Military record

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-11-2003
Why is Kerry hiding his Military record
66
Fri, 09-10-2004 - 12:08am
If he's got nothing to hide, why won't he sign a Form 180 which authorizes release of all his records?



Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-24-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 4:23pm
Unfortunately I can't spend every waking moment watching TV, and I believe at the time I was watching stuff from the RNC. I do think alot of people like to throw around the word "atack" for the mere mention of anything said that's critical of another. I have not heard Kerry "attack" Bush or Chaney, but yes he's criticized them. They have criticized him also, but most of the attacking I hear is not out of their mouths, but others. Mostly from 527 ads. I cannot however say the same for the RNC's website, that is disgracefull, all the smear ads they have on there. I hear alot of people making there judgements based on things they heard on 527 ads, from people like MR.More, from bias websites, and from bias radio and tv statements. These people should really try to find factual info to base their opinion on, not bias mess in the media.

Venus

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-20-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 4:28pm
"No WMD"?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120268,00.html

Oops, that's a Foxnews source. I guess half the readers won't bother with it then.

There just will never be ENOUGH WMD found to satisfy Bush-haters.

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-20-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 4:36pm
<>

Yes, and the AP is doing the best they can to free these people. After all, they vote Democrat and we need all the votes we can get now.

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-20-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 4:38pm


But Soros and Moore and Texans for Truth are OK. It's only the Republican 527's that are bad.

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-24-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 5:14pm
Maybe you should reread my posts, I did not specifically say the RNC, or DNC 527 ads. I was refering to all these ads. I did specifically say the RNC website. Most of the other stuff I said was against both sides. So don't try and play that game. I never said ads attacking Bush are fine while ads attacking Kerry are terrible, or vice versa. They all suck, and they all take away from the real issues.

Venus
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 7:58pm
I doubt you were watching the RNC as the meeting was at midnight, over an hour after Bush's speech ended....possibly just watching a recap on the news?

I didnt see the Kerry speech until the following day, and I thought that Al Gore took over Kerry's body to give the speech, without any emotion however.

With regards to the bias part, it cannot be biased against the candidate when it comes from his very own mouth.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 7:59pm
They are ALL bad, and the McCain - Feingold bill needs to have that gaping hole fixed quickly.
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 7:59pm
LOL
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-31-2003
Mon, 09-20-2004 - 8:14pm
<> Or for the Bush appointed Iraqi Survey Group apparently. Or for Colin Powell, who's pretty much retracted his UN "evidence" speech. Wait...I get it...Charles Duelfer, David Kay and Colin Powell are all Bush Haters. Seize them!!! Thanks Liberal Idiot!


http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6023159/

Report: Iraq had no WMD, only intentions

U.S. weapons inspector says regime had small R&D program

The Associated Press

Updated: 9:03 a.m. ET Sept. 17, 2004

WASHINGTON - Drafts of a report from the top U.S. inspector in Iraq conclude there were no weapons stockpiles, but say there are signs the fallen Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had dormant programs he hoped to revive at a later time, according to people familiar with the findings.

advertisementIn a 1,500-page report, the head of the Iraq Survey Group, Charles Duelfer, will find Saddam was importing banned materials, working on unmanned aerial vehicles in violation of U.N. agreements and maintaining a dual-use industrial sector that could produce weapons.

Duelfer also says Iraq only had small research and development programs for chemical and biological weapons.

As Duelfer puts the finishing touches on his report, he concludes Saddam had intentions of restarting weapons programs at some point, after suspicion and inspections from the international community waned.

After a year and a half in Iraq, however, the United States has found no weapons of mass destruction — its chief argument for overthrowing the regime.

An intelligence official said Duelfer could wrap up the report as soon as this month. Those who discussed the report inside and outside the government did so on the condition of anonymity because it contains classified material and is not yet completed.

‘We were almost all wrong’

The report is expected to be similar to findings reported by Duelfer’s predecessor, David Kay, who presented an interim report to Congress in October. Kay left the post in January, saying, “We were almost all wrong” about Saddam’s weapons programs.

Duelfer’s report, however, is expected to fall between the position of the Bush administration before the war — portraying Saddam as a grave threat — and the declarative statements Kay made after he resigned.

It will also add more evidence and flesh out Kay’s October findings. Then, Kay said the Iraq Survey Group had only uncovered limited evidence of secret chemical and biological weapons programs, but he found substantial evidence of an Iraqi push to boost the range of its ballistic missiles beyond prohibited ranges.

He also said there was almost no sign that a significant nuclear weapons project was under way.

  FACT FILE Iraq intelligence -- before and after the war

• Chemical weapons

• Biological weapons

• Nuclear weapons

• Missiles

• Unmanned aerial vehicles

Chemical weapons

Before: Iraq was believed to have stocked up to 500 metric tons of chemical warfare agents. It was also said to have concealed equipment and other items needed for continuing chemical weapons production.

After: No chemical weapons have been found. Some sources say Iraq was conducting experiments to develop chemical weapons, but no physical evidence has been found. More time is needed to investigate.

Weapons to Syria?

Duelfer’s report doesn’t reach firm conclusions in all areas. For instance, U.S. officials are still investigating whether Saddam’s fallen regime may have sent chemical weapons equipment and several billion dollars over the border to Syria. That has not been confirmed, but remains an area of interest to the U.S. government.

The Duelfer report will come months after the Senate Intelligence Committee released a scathing assessment of the prewar intelligence on Iraq.

After a yearlong inquiry, the Republican-led committee said in July the CIA kept key information from its own and other agencies’ analysts, engaged in “group think” by failing to challenge the assumption that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and allowed President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell to make false statements.

The Iraq Survey Group has been working since the summer of 2003 to find Saddam’s weapons and better understand his prohibited programs. More than a thousand civilian and military weapons specialists, translators and other experts have been devoted to the effort.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-18-2004
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 1:30am

Hi liberal_idiot!


Welcome to the board!

Miffy - Co-CL For The Politics Today Board

Visit My Website!

Email me!

Miffy - Co-CL For The Politics Today Board

Pages