The Dishonesty Thing

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-11-1999
The Dishonesty Thing
3
Fri, 09-10-2004 - 1:54pm
The Dishonesty Thing By PAUL KRUGMAN

It's the dishonesty, stupid. The real issue in the National Guard story isn't what George W. Bush did three decades ago. It's the recent pattern of lies: his assertions that he fulfilled his obligations when he obviously didn't, the White House's repeated claims that it had released all of the relevant documents when it hadn't.

It's the same pattern of dishonesty, this time involving personal matters that the public can easily understand, that some of us have long seen on policy issues, from global warming to the war in Iraq. On budget matters, which is where I came in, serious analysts now take administration dishonesty for granted.

It wasn't always that way. Three years ago, those of us who accused the administration of cooking the budget books were ourselves accused, by moderates as well as by Bush loyalists, of being "shrill." These days the coalition of the shrill has widened to include almost every independent budget expert.

For example, back in February the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities accused the Bush administration of, in effect, playing three-card monte with budget forecasts. It pointed out that the administration's deficit forecast was far above those of independent analysts, and suggested that this exaggeration was deliberate.

"Overstating the 2004 deficit," the center wrote, "could allow the president to announce significant 'progress' on the deficit in late October - shortly before Election Day - when the Treasury Department announces the final figures."

Was this a wild accusation from a liberal think tank? No, it's conventional wisdom among experts. Two months ago Stanley Collender, a respected nonpartisan analyst, warned: "At some point over the next few weeks, the Office of Management and Budget will release the administration's midsession budget review and try to convince everyone the federal deficit is falling. Don't believe them."

: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/10/opinion/10krugman.html

dablacksox


Cynic: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.---Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-31-2003
Fri, 09-10-2004 - 8:26pm
Thanks for posting this. Krugman is great. Let's all remember, the next time someone here argues that President Bush is going to cut the deficit in half in the next five years....what do we say? "Only if his tax cuts don't become permenent." (Yes, one half of his economic plan is banking on the fact that the other half will be defeated. What happens if Bush gets everything he wants? Disaster.)
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-27-2003
Fri, 09-10-2004 - 9:22pm

Thanks for showing me that someone is paying attention.


Elaine

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-11-1999
Fri, 09-10-2004 - 10:16pm
"I posted the same article first thing this morning and barely got a response. Seems that nobody want's to face the real issues of today"

I didn't see yours or I wouldn't have posted over you, I was in a hurry when I posted these earlier.

You are right though, we have a mess in Iraq that is damaging the long term interests of this country, we have a domestic economic mess that is damaging the long term interests of this country, and the only thing that excites anyone is what Bush or Kerry did or said 30 years ago and how much they paid in taxes. We get the government we deserve.

dablacksox


Cynic: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.---Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary.