Killian Office Memo Not Similar to CBS
Find a Conversation
Killian Office Memo Not Similar to CBS
| Sat, 09-11-2004 - 11:16am |
CBS memo: http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf
An analysis done on CBS memo: http://img41.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img41&image=60minbusted.swf
Memo from military (click 'enlarge' icon): http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc25.gif
And some funny comments: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1212833/posts
I want to see how the Sunday morning lib shows will spin this. What I want to know is how the DNC planned to get away with these forgeries knowing that ALL sources are easily verifiable on the internet?

Pages
The difference between my posts and your posts is that mine include something called information. You're free to disagree with it, and encouraged to present information of your own which supports your argument, but it's not at all productive to just repeat yourself, complain, and then insult people.
You've asserted twice that Ben Barnes is an employee of the Kerry campaign. Once again, can you provide any evidence to support that claim?
??
In case you lost your train of thought, Metrochick asked for the link (again) proving that Barnes is an employee of the Kerry campaign, something of which you are absolutely certain.
Just thought someone as concerned about the facts as you appear to be would want to be reminded to provide that link, as it's been requested several times. I'm sure you were simply sidetracked while trying to author a polite reply to someone else.
Edited 9/14/2004 4:43 pm ET ET by righton2004
I still think that there is a strong possibility that the Killian memo's are not real and CBS fell for the fraud big time. When Killian's son offered a list of several other people to call on the topic, they chose not to follow up on the list, even though the list contained several other people who served with and under Killian in the ANG. I question CBS's motives in not doing a thorough job in investigating, and even their support of the documents is fairly weak, at best.
Their top support for the documents Maj. Gen Hodges said that he even thinks the documents are forged (but then again he is not an expert). The best argument I have heard about the documents, outside of the fact that Stoudt had retired 18 months before he supposedly pressued Killian to sugarcoat Bush's service, is the fact that these are supposed official memo's but do not appear anywhere else in Bush's military service file, as they should, or in the official files of the Texas ANG, as they should.
Nice try.
Pages