BUSH DUCKING DEBATE

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-21-2004
BUSH DUCKING DEBATE
78
Wed, 09-15-2004 - 10:45am

Presidential Debates and Missed Opportunities<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />


Wednesday, <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />September 15, 2004; Page A24


The president has been offered a rare opportunity to discuss key issues and concerns with Americans and appears to be leaning toward declining it . President Bush seems to be concerned about the town-hall-meeting format of the second debate, in which undecided voters picked by the Gallup Organization would ask the candidates questions. The Post noted that the Bush campaign is concerned that "people could pose as undecided when they actually are partisans."


Can't the president answer citizens' questions, partisan or not?


+++++++


I am extremely unhappy about the prospect of the president skipping the most critical of the three debates. But I am not surprised, given that the 1992 town-hall-style debate is largely seen as the nail in the coffin of his father's reelection bid and given the great pains the White House has taken to insulate President Bush from criticism and the opinions of Americans who are not vocal supporters.


Rather than canceling the town-hall debate, the Commission on Presidential Debates should leave an empty stool on stage next to the candidate who does show up. That might make for the most interesting presidential debate in years.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21915-2004Sep14.html?referrer=email


 

Donna

Patriotism means to stand by the Country. It does not mean to stand by the President. -- Theodore Roosevelt.

Donna

Pages

Avatar for tmcgoughy
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2003
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 10:39am
Ok, now you've just confused me.
The first key to wisdom is constant and frequent questioning, for by doubting we are led to question and by questioning we arrive at the truth.  -
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 10:55am
The negativity in the campaigning.

Instead of contrasting the difference between their candidate and Bush, McAullife would much rather tote the CBS memo story, or say Bush was AWOL, or say Bush lied to Americans about Iraq, or claim Bush actually lost the Presidency back in 2000.

All rhetoric....no substance and fact. This is the leader of the DNC?

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-11-2004
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 1:00pm
There are going to be three debates. You have a lot of anger built up inside. We need to unite not fight each other.
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-23-2004
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 1:39pm


It would be hard to find anything to "prove" this statement either right or wrong, since it is full of speculation and subjectivity:

"Posing as a nonpartisan institution committed to voter education, the CPD has continually and deceptively run the debates in the interest of the national Republican and Democratic parties, not the American people. The CPD, co-chaired by the former heads of the Republican and Democratic parties, secretly submits to the demands of the Republican and Democratic candidates."

Where's the evidence that the commission is only "posing" as nonpartisan, or that it "secretly" submits to party demands? Even if the questions weren't approved, are there really any questions that can be asked that the candidates won't be "prepared for"? I don't think so. I think there has to be some way to avoid a free for all where extremist wackos get a forum to spew hateful rhetoric rather than asking intelligent questions.



I wouldn't disagree with the part about excluding third party and independent candidates, but I do think that the tough questions usually get asked, maybe not in as strident a manner as some would like, but I think it's to everyone's benefit to try and keep things civilized. I do believe there IS a concerted effort by both parties to keep other voices out though.

Avatar for tmcgoughy
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2003
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 3:16pm

"Where's the evidence that the commission is only "posing" as nonpartisan, or that it "secretly" submits to party demands?"


This statement can be disproved if there is evidence that the

The first key to wisdom is constant and frequent questioning, for by doubting we are led to question and by questioning we arrive at the truth.  -
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-21-2004
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 3:28pm
Those were not my comments but yes, I am angry over the president of my country lying to me, congress and the world to go to a war, costing us in lives and dollars, and has lost us credibility and respect in the world. I am an American and I have always been proud of my country (mostly) and I want to be again. The only way to make that happen is to get rid of this arrogant irresponsible warmonger we have sitting in the white house now. We should all be angry enough to create the change to make it better.
Donna

Patriotism means to stand by the Country. It does not mean to stand by the President. -- Theodore Roosevelt.

Donna
Avatar for tmcgoughy
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2003
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 3:30pm
So you're
The first key to wisdom is constant and frequent questioning, for by doubting we are led to question and by questioning we arrive at the truth.  -
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-16-2004
Tue, 09-21-2004 - 3:42pm
No, just those running for national office, or even state office, as I have seen the same rhetoric used on local television ads for my state representative.




Edited 9/21/2004 3:43 pm ET ET by debateguy

Pages