Sarah Palin Interview
Find a Conversation
| Fri, 09-12-2008 - 12:02am |
She was awful. But I suppose her fans will makes more excuses and blame Charlie Gibson.
Gibson asked the questions she should already know the answers to, viewpoints that she should have already had long before being groomed by the McCain team. To suggest that Gibson was purposefully rude or condescending is absurd – he was easy on her. He asked questions that Americans want and need to know their public officials- especially the second in command- know before taking oath. Any frustration he might have experienced during this interview was because of her clear lack of familiarity with really important issues. She tried to evade the questions, which will unavoidably lead a journalist to keep trying to get an answer. that's what they do! She got defensive when he asked her if she had ever met a Head of State.
Was he supposed to ask her where she bought her shoes? Or “what’s it like to be a pistol-packin hockey mom?â€
Sarah Palin needs to learn the pronunciation of “nuclearâ€. I believe we have just witnessed "Apocalipstick Now". Sarah Palin came across as both clueless and arrogant. The party is over, the confetti is gone. Since she’s so adamant about being “ready†to help lead the country she needs to get real.

Pages
*** Yeah I know about facts and 'stuff' I just haven't gotten many from you Dr. Spin
Sure you have...we started with the Gibson interview and YOU proved that he was wrong and biased. Then, we went to the "Bush Doctrine" itself...and YOU proved yourself wrong on that issue too. Thanks for carrying the load on this one. ; )
*** I didn't prove myself wrong -
Yes, you did.
*** I only said that my children had learned of it in school.
Then you should call the principal and demand that they stop preaching liberal propaganda at your school.
*** Then, since you were acting so obtuse I had to prove that Dick Cheney had spoken about it -
A lot of people have "talked" about it...but I guess the real distinction depends on what they're actually talking about and referring to.
*** up to that point you seemed to deny it's existence accusing me of liberal propaganda.
Right...a "doctrine" as referenced by Charlie Gibson, that actually details certain ideals and philosophies...doesn't exist...that's why you couldn't find it. But some generic "title" applied to any number of Bush policies...absolutely. So unless you can dig up some "official" version of the "Bush Doctrine", Charlie Gibson will remain wrong and Sarah Palin will remain right.
*** Interesting view on how spin works though - very insightful.
Stop talking...it'll go away. ; )
Pages