The question which I DO find interesting, though - as well as still open - is whether any conservative - ANY conservative here, especially the ones who claim to be fair-minded and against slanderous or irrelevant and negative campaign tactics, will drop into this thread and say what is obvious to literally everyone out there but usapatriot, apparently: that Larry Sinclair is a loon, and a discredited one at that, and that this stuff shouldn't even be taking place, let alone being debated as if it were worthy of consideration.
I'm not holding my breath, though, which is a good-sized chunk of the reason I simply do not believe many of this board's conservatives when they make plaintive claims of levelheadedness and opposition to gutterball politics. Instead of saying "whoa, that's off-limits, let's at least keep it on the realistic, non-slanderous stuff," many conservatives' stance appears to be "hey, if it knocks a few points off Obama's score, who am I to let a thing like fairness or accuracy or even reality get in the way of defeating a candidate I oppose?"
The question which I DO find interesting, though - as well as still open - is whether any conservative - ANY conservative here, especially the ones who claim to be fair-minded and against slanderous or irrelevant and negative campaign tactics, will drop into this thread and say what is obvious to literally everyone out there but usapatriot, apparently: that Larry Sinclair is a loon, and a discredited one at that, and that this stuff shouldn't even be taking place, let alone being debated as if it were worthy of consideration.
You're kidding, right?
Do you suppose Sarah Palin takes Larry's questions?
And to think that people of that caliber vote! ~~~scary~~~
Neither am I.
The question which I DO find interesting, though - as well as still open - is whether any conservative - ANY conservative here, especially the ones who claim to be fair-minded and against slanderous or irrelevant and negative campaign tactics, will drop into this thread and say what is obvious to literally everyone out there but usapatriot, apparently: that Larry Sinclair is a loon, and a discredited one at that, and that this stuff shouldn't even be taking place, let alone being debated as if it were worthy of consideration.
I'm not holding my breath, though, which is a good-sized chunk of the reason I simply do not believe many of this board's conservatives when they make plaintive claims of levelheadedness and opposition to gutterball politics. Instead of saying "whoa, that's off-limits, let's at least keep it on the realistic, non-slanderous stuff," many conservatives' stance appears to be "hey, if it knocks a few points off Obama's score, who am I to let a thing like fairness or accuracy or even reality get in the way of defeating a candidate I oppose?"
The question which I DO find interesting, though - as well as still open - is whether any conservative - ANY conservative here, especially the ones who claim to be fair-minded and against slanderous or irrelevant and negative campaign tactics, will drop into this thread and say what is obvious to literally everyone out there but usapatriot, apparently: that Larry Sinclair is a loon, and a discredited one at that, and that this stuff shouldn't even be taking place, let alone being debated as if it were worthy of consideration.