I read my news exclusively from RSS feeds. No dead-tree editions for me. Although I do have a subscription to Press Display, in case I need to refer to the actual physical image of any given newspaper (because they don't put all of their content into the online edition).
But I could tell you - with probably only one or two omissions - which RSS feeds I read: there's the NYT, the AJC (my local paper), the WaPo, the Washington Times (because I'm an amateur masochist, and plus, it's always a good idea to stay on top of the latest wingnut memes as they're being hatched), the Guardian of London, Ha'aretz, Le Monde.....um....the Beeb, reuters, uh....now's where I'm gonna forget a few of 'em. Oh yeah - at least one of the McClatchy papers, usually the Miami Herald.
Now, I don't read each of those cover-to-cover every day, but I most definitely scan through 'em before hitting "mark all as read." And I think that even under the most extreme pressure, I could probably remember most of that same list I just gave you. Sarah Palin either
Can't remember which papers & newsmagazines she reads,
Doesn't read ANY, or
The contents of her actual reading list (as far as news) is so obviously wingnutty that even she understands it wouldn't be such a hot idea for her to actually say "I read PowerTools, RedState, InstaPutz, FreeRepublic, AtlasJuggsShrugs, Michelle Malkin, Hugh Hewitt and the local PTA circular."
None of those possibilities is particularly encouraging.
Pages
the point it though .. b/c she didn't name specific mags, rags, or papers does not = she doesn't read them.
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
it's important we know what mags she reads?
ok.
I already said above that if she had answered and said:
If Obama had brought on as his VP nominee a person who few conservatives
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
But I could tell you - with probably only one or two omissions - which RSS feeds I read: there's the NYT, the AJC (my local paper), the WaPo, the Washington Times (because I'm an amateur masochist, and plus, it's always a good idea to stay on top of the latest wingnut memes as they're being hatched), the Guardian of London, Ha'aretz, Le Monde.....um....the Beeb, reuters, uh....now's where I'm gonna forget a few of 'em. Oh yeah - at least one of the McClatchy papers, usually the Miami Herald.
Now, I don't read each of those cover-to-cover every day, but I most definitely scan through 'em before hitting "mark all as read." And I think that even under the most extreme pressure, I could probably remember most of that same list I just gave you. Sarah Palin either
None of those possibilities is particularly encouraging.
doesn't want to say or elects not to say does not equal can't say ....
how is she sequestered?
wouldn't that mean no interviews or only interviews with 'safe' interviewers?
I said something opposite?
didn't think so
I'm looking forward to the debate .. and the next ones with Obama and McCain.
Pages