OMG. Palin has no brain.
Find a Conversation
OMG. Palin has no brain.
| Wed, 10-01-2008 - 8:09pm |
Never - ever - have I heard more a vacuous, vapid response to a question from a major candidate for public office:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml
Please, people. Please. You cannot put this bimbo in the White House.

Pages
Where did you get that 200 days number?
Yes....but everyone would wonder what on earth you were talking about. He hasn't been in Washington like Biden and McCain, but compared to Palin, he's got the experiences of a lifetime.
Do you just not read up on candidates much? Or do you consciously choose to ignore that which you find which doesn't fit into your preconceptions? Here's the best example of her tendencies to abuse power (though there certainly are other examples):
Dunno about you, but that sort of shameless and selfish misuse of the taxpayers' money for personal whim is not something I’m particularly interested in letting near the Vice Presidency.
Please do us a favor and read up on the actual definitions of socialism - and its common, correct usage, because (to paraphrase Inigo Montoya) "you keep using that word....I do not think it means what you think it means." ;o)
That'd be because it's important to know what you want change FROM, if you are truly going to advocate for it, wouldn't you say? There'd be no reason FOR change, if everyone agreed that the policies of George W. Bush had been overall quite good things for the country. Biden and Obama are pointing out the many, MANY ways in which a man - John McCain, who voted 90+% of the time WITH George Bush's policies/wishes - would be merely a continuation of those same, disastrous policies which have led us to the highest unemployment rate in decades, nine straight months of job losses, two disastrous wars which have made this country less wealthy and less safe, etc, etc, etc.... That's why. If McCain actually REPRESENTED significant change from most of those policies, we'd be having a very different election season. But he doesn't.
<<"tired of all the crap on this board">>
Thank yóu for adding your 'info posts' pdljmpr :-)! From the outside looking in.......it'll never stop amazing (to put it kindly) me, to read the viciousness when criticizing any candidate. Sexist, racist and ageist......
I agree with Alicia, the ignore-button is your friend :-).
Djie
Not necessarily. It may very well have already been proven, since the investigation has been concluded. We just don't know what it contains - and there is certainly a distinct possibility that it most certainly HAS proven abuse of power, and the only thing that remains is to release those findings to the public:
Now.....that doesn't prove that Palin abused her power...but it does mean that a full, public investigation into the matter has already been conducted, and its findings need only be made public. Why do you suppose, then, that despite having their lawsuit dismissed, the same six Republican legislators in Alaska who tried to quash this thing with that suit have now filed suit again, to try to delay the release until after the election? This investigation's complete: why WOULDN'T the American public want to know the evidence regarding such allegations about one of the four people vying for the two top spots in the nation BEFORE they're forced to make their choice in November.
http://llhaesa.org/
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
Pages