OMG. Palin has no brain.
Find a Conversation
OMG. Palin has no brain.
| Wed, 10-01-2008 - 8:09pm |
Never - ever - have I heard more a vacuous, vapid response to a question from a major candidate for public office:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml
Please, people. Please. You cannot put this bimbo in the White House.

Pages
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
It is not the same ideology, and I am not sure why you think it is. It is not only democrats, lefties or liberals who have problems with neoconservatism, many paleoconservatives and libertarians do too.
As people have tried to show you, neoconservatism is not simply extreme conservatism (and even if it were, Obama does not represent some kind of extreme liberalism, so even there the analogy is flawed).
>>> Does that mean that you find it irrelevant what the commander said? "Quantify them...know them...and kill them."
I agree with that philosophy.
>>> Obviously you have yet to realize that it really is not that simple. Remember the Hydra?
The mythical beast killed by Heracles? Sure…why do you ask?
>>> In case others read as well: "British commander says war in Afghanistan cannot be won
Sun Oct 5, 2008 11:43am EDT
Wow…I’d suggest that he be removed from duty immediately and sent to work for the Obama campaign as a military advisor.
< Actually, what I have is evidence that is strong.
>>> Only in the olfactory sense of the word. But even that's not strictly true, either, since you actually told antineocon you had "proof" (your words).
I think you'll have to look closer to home for the source of that olfactory offense, and I do have, what many would consider "proof" that WMDs had been moved...but I realize I'm debating liberals who wouldn't believe in WMDs if they were sitting on them, so I downgrade expectations to "strong evidence."
< Hence the evidence...duh.
>>> A few satellite photos of trucks at a compound and a pile of Sean Inanity's fever-dreams don't actually add up to "evidence," you know. But keep trying; maybe you'll get there someday.
I didn't say the evidence was compromised of a few satellite photos...you did, in a pathetic attempt to diminish it's value. But keep trying, maybe you'll get there someday. LOL!
< I don't think anyone is too worked up over a Hagee endorsement
I don't think anyone's losing sleep over it, either....but it - along with the Parsley one - will be a nice one-or-two-sentence way to simply dispose of the whole "Rev. Wright" crap, if (when) McCain re-dredges THAT up (because he's got nothing left to run on.
We can already see the quaking of the wacko-left at the mere thought of Rev. Wright being brought up again...and again...and again. LOL! Well, grab on tight cause Wright's gonna take the stage...front and center. And go right ahead, bring up Hagee and Parsley...we're not afraid...you can't put McCain in the pews with those guys for 20-odd years or make them personal mentors. Barry's got a lot to explain and we're going to make sure he does it loudly and publicly.
>>> More to the point, though, is reflecting back upon the great(ly silly) rhetorical lengths to deny that anyone could prove (and therefore couldn't conclude) that McCain had indeed sought out Hagee's endorsement. It was true, of course....but that didn't stop you from trying to deny that fact until it could no longer be denied.
Who cares? We've got: “The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied.”
“We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because of stuff we have done overseas is now brought back into our own backyard. America is chickens coming home to roost.”
“Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is controlled by rich, white people. Hillary would never know that.”
Like I said: Bye, bye Barry! BWAHAHAHAHA. :D
"You are incorrect!! Obama is NOT and NEVER WAS part of the Chicago machine. Anyone who thinks he is, doesn't understand, or know the inner workings of the machine."
You couldn't be more wrong.
Wow...thanks for that bit of old news...LOL!...
Many U.S. military commanders in Iraq believe they have dealt a large enough blow to al Qaeda in Iraq to declare victory over the group, according to a report in the Washington Post.
U.S. generals tout recent successes against the Sunni militants as evidence that al Qaeda in Iraq, known by the acronym AQI, may have been dealt a blow from which it cannot recover.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/15/iraq/main3366346.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_3366346
Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaeda, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.
In a strikingly upbeat assessment, the CIA chief cited major gains against al-Qaeda's allies in the Middle East and an increasingly successful campaign to destabilize the group's core leadership.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/29/AR2008052904116_pf.html
Bookmark.
Pages