OMG. Palin has no brain.
Find a Conversation
OMG. Palin has no brain.
| Wed, 10-01-2008 - 8:09pm |
Never - ever - have I heard more a vacuous, vapid response to a question from a major candidate for public office:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml
Please, people. Please. You cannot put this bimbo in the White House.

Pages
I thought that you thought it was, thus my question as to how they are similar and your reasoning for creating that new word.
I agree that the philosophies of liberals and neoconservatives are very different.
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
Now I'm starting to understand why we got bogged down in Iraq, a country which did not attack us, and was in no way connected with 9/11 OR Al Qaeda. Keep your eye on the ball, dude: AQI is NOT where the real threat to us came from, nor has it ever come from there since we helped create the conditions for it to exist in the first place. You might try this, if you need a little refresher. AQI is a sideshow, and everyone in the intel business knows it.
However, back on planet Earth (as opposed to BushWorld), we find this (it's OK, it's from FAUX "News," so you can "trust" it - wingnut approved!):
Or this:
Try again.
>>> Sooo, if I live in Texas and I can see Mexico from my backyard, does that give me knowledge/insight into foreign (specifically Latin America) policy?
No, but it would probaby give you a perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relations with all of these countries, especially Mexico.
"No, but it would probaby give you a perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relations with all of these countries, especially Mexico."
hahaha Are you serious?
>>> Now I'm starting to understand why we got bogged down in Iraq, a country which did not attack us, and was in no way connected with 9/11 OR Al Qaeda.
It was connected...duh.
>>> Keep your eye on the ball, dude: AQI is NOT where the real threat to us came from, nor has it ever come from there since we helped create the conditions for it to exist in the first place. You might try this, if you need a little refresher. AQI is a sideshow, and everyone in the intel business knows it
Over here...watch the birdie...all of the leftie wackos have been saying for years that Al Qaeda was in Iraq because we were in Iraq...LOL! We don't care how they got there, or why they came...what we care about is that we destroyed them...and that you were wrong, of course. ; )
>>> However, back on planet Earth (as opposed to BushWorld), we find this (it's OK, it's from FAUX "News," so you can "trust" it - wingnut approved!):
Hello! Hello! Come back! You're too far out in left field! LOL! Sorry...try harder. I proved my case, now you're just flailing around desperately looking for something to cling to now that you've been proven utterly...completely...definitively...wrong. LOL!
Try again.
You proved your case?
How, exactly? Originally, you responded to this point by sild: "the failure to capture bin Laden has seriously hindered the reaching of that objective," by saying "not really. The deaths of so many Al Qaeda leaders and the dismantling of their organization have dealt them a significant, if not debilitating, blow.
No mention in there of "debilitating blow only to the Iraq component of Al Qaeda," where everyone agrees the main headquarters of - and threat from - Al Qaeda ISN'T located. If you'd taken pains to limit your crowing about "debilitating blows" to Iraq explicitly, you MIGHT have a point (though not a very good one, considering that's not where Al Qaeda's headquartered). But you didn't. You just claimed - contrary to both fact and the recent assertions of our own commanders along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border - that Al Qaeda had been dealt a "debilitating blow."
Hooey.
And I demonstrated to you (and everyone else) that your statement was hooey...whereupon you replied with your "but I meant AQI" nonsense, which is not only lame but also wasn't what you said to begin with.
Try again.
edited to close an open quotation.
Edited 10/6/2008 3:31 pm ET by palin_in_comparison
>>> Do you REALLY have to do this? I could just get my 7 yr old DS to debate with you!
Well, unless she's a lot better than mommy, she'd lose. LOL!
BTW...how'd she do with the inane "I can see Mexico" question?
Pages