Gwen Ifill - VP Debate Moderator

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-12-2008
Gwen Ifill - VP Debate Moderator
106
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 1:15am

Debate moderators were chosen in August.   If McCain camp had a problem with Ifill as moderator, they've had a looooong time to object.   No, Ifill will be one of many excuses they can use when Palin bombs.


Re: Gwen Ifill's book, one needs to look no further than the conservative Washington Times, which published an article about said book on JULY 23rd, long before either potential Veep had been selected. I do not know when Ifill was chosen to moderate this debate, but the fact of the matter is that any idiot in McCain's camp could have googled Gwen Ifill and received this information and had they thought it a "conflict of interest" requested another moderator two months ago.


To those saying the debate has been "fixed", well - um - the debate hasn't even taken place yet.  Hmmm, apparently you don't have much confidence in Sarah Palin.  You shoul dbe cheering her on instead of preparing for failure.


tsk tsk


 




 


 

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 8:38am

I heard a rationale as to why Ifill could be biased in her presentation as well as how.

NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-01-2008
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 8:45am

>>I understand that she did not disclose her book deal to the selection committee.

That's what I understand too, and I think that's a huge problem.

>>Was it McCain's camp's duty to scour her background and look for bias?

Yes. He's in charge of his campaign.

>>What would have been said then?

"I respectfully disagree with the choice of moderator, because she is writing a book that addresses events in the recent primary and possibly the election. Let's look at our other options."

>>In a court of law, Ifill bias would get her dismissed for conflict of interest. She has a HUGE conflict of interest.

She should have at least disclosed the information. That's standard, ethical journalism. Not having read the book, I'm not sure that there is a clear conflict of interest.

>>Palin has a lot to rectify here. The interviews with Couric and Gibson certainly hurt her. I think that it's a prove it or loose it (literally) situation for her.

I agree.

Laura

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-03-2008
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 8:47am
I guess she was fine as the Governor of Alaska, but she was in her element, she is out of her element. I actually feel sorry for her. She is going to be put on the spot. I would imagine though the candidates are told ahaead of time what questions could be asked, so they have time to prepare their answers.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-25-2006
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 9:45am
Sure they could have googled this information. What I am wondering though is why didn't Ifill or anyone associated with the actual hosting of the debate GIVE this information to the McCain camp, long ago.

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-25-2006
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 9:50am
Yes!


iVillage Member
Registered: 07-15-2008
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 10:12am

And yes, McCain could have challenged Ifill as a moderator.

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-20-2007
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 10:26am

"In a court of law, Ifill bias would get her dismissed for conflict of interest.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 10:41am

Let all the snobs and intellectuals pontificate!


Sarah Pailin knows where I live, a neighborhood of the midwest.

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-25-2008
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 10:43am
I understand that she did not disclose her book deal to the selection committee.


False. And it was public knowledge. Cripes, when something's been written about in various newspapers and is advertised in circulars sent to every library and bookstore in America, it's hardly a "sub-rosa" issue.

McCain's already personally stated what is obviously true: that Gwen Ifill is a complete professional, who isn't likely to show pronounced bias at this debate. If he's OK with it, why shouldn't others be? What could POSSIBLY be the rationale for trying to gin up reasons to pre-explain any possible loss for Palin?

Hmmm?

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-01-2008
Thu, 10-02-2008 - 10:46am

>>False. And it was public knowledge.

I haven't found evidence that she did. Can you point me in that direction?

As a journalist myself, I can say with confidence that she should have told the debate commission -- whether or not there was fanfare. This is a serious mistake on her part, not insurmountable, but serious. Disclosure of potential (notice I said potential) conflict of interest is basic stuff.

Laura

Pages