Palin's Christian Values
Find a Conversation
Palin's Christian Values
| Sun, 10-05-2008 - 2:08pm |
Apparently, Palin's bible is short of a few commandments. It looks like in her mad pursuit for power Palin has forgotten about the admonitions against lieing and bearing false witness. During the debate Biden continually admonished her for not telling the truth (lieing). She is now also calling Obama a terrorist. She knows she is bearing false witness but is repeating this statement over and over again and all of those alleged christian conservative applaud.
She is a absolute and total hypocrite, and so are her fundamentalist supporters. She has a lot of nerve telling other women that they will burn in hell for not supporting her.

Pages
I really don't want someone else to come in and teach our children to be immoral and unpatriotic....especially NOW.
McCain's first wife was in a car accident and was disfigured. McCain started and affair with his current wife who was a lot younger, and had a pile of money. He dumped the first wife for the better deal. I guess that's moral to some people.
Cindy McCain was arrested for stealing drugs but thanks to John's deal making was let off the hook. I guess that's moral to some people.
Cindy McCain's father had mob connections was jailed for racketeering.
United Liqueurs, the McCain's company is still rumored to be on the shady side. I guess that's moral to some people.
You are voting against Obama because of a work of fiction? Do you know how many Obama there are out there? Do you believe in the reality of Snow White, Cinderella, do you fear evil trolls and dragons?
We are in trying times but try to use factual information to make a decision. If you don't like Obama because of his economic or health care plans, that fine but don't cite works of fiction to justify your reasoning.
Do you have a source where she calls Obama a terrorist ? Do you have a link to a source where she tells women they will burn in hell for not supporting her ?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/05/ap-palins-ayers-attack-ra_n_132008.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/05/palin-misquotes-albright_n_131967.html
"She has a lot of nerve telling other women that they will burn in hell for not supporting her. "
And this based on something she said she read off her Starbucks cup.
"taught our children it was OK to cheat"
Oh please. Drop the scare tactics.
"What for 1 month?
Her statements are meant to lead one to the conclusion that if Obama had associations with people holding certain values than he must share these values. Why else would they keep bringing up Bill Ayers? It is obvious they want people to believe that he is a terrorist by proxy and hence not to be trusted. Limbaugh and Hannity have been dishing this stuff for a year. It is one thing for scam right wing media to put out this stuff, it is an entirely different situation when a candidate dishes this up.
Palin owes Obama and Madeline Albright an apology.
Palin Criticizes Obama's 'Terrorist' Connection
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi3oP74kMjA
A Pal Around McCain
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/05/AR2008100501816_pf.html
"There's no question that we have to change the subject here," a senior Republican operative told The Post's Michael D. Shear in a story published Saturday.
The "subject" in question is the economy and how to fix it. As Americans have taken their eye off the ball -- that is, off John McCain's sterling qualities of character and command -- by focusing on the economy, Barack Obama has surged into the lead nationally and in many key battleground states.
So long as the candidates talk about that pesky economy, McCain's handlers have realized, McCain will continue to swoon. Thus the campaign has announced that it will go on the attack again on the momentous topics of Obama's ties to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers, the onetime Weatherman who has been a University of Illinois education professor for nearly two decades.
Campaigning on Saturday in Colorado, Sarah Palin accused Obama of "palling around with terrorists" by associating with Ayers, citing as her source a New York Times story from that morning. In fact, the story concluded that the Obama-Ayers "relationship" consisted of both men attending the board meetings of two Chicago organizations and that there had been no contact between the men, other than bumping into each other on the sidewalk (they live in the same neighborhood), since Obama went to the U.S. Senate in January 2005.
The story of Obama's interaction with Ayers is drenched in irony, since it is basically a tale of Obama being co-opted into Chicago's civic establishment. In 1995, Obama, then a young lawyer with political ambitions but as yet no office, was recruited to chair the board of a school reform organization funded and established by the Annenberg Foundation -- a group that distributes the wealth of the estate of Walter Annenberg, Richard Nixon's ambassador to Britain. It was only then that Obama met Ayers, who already was a board member and a figure in Chicago's education-policy elite. (Mayor Richard Daley, that known radical, told the Times that he had consulted Ayers on education issues for years.)
Go join your city's establishment, and see what it gets you.
But if the McCain people want to rummage through presidential candidates' associations, real or imagined, to turn up figures who threaten to pull down this proud republic, they should begin in-house. Chief among those to whom responsibility attaches for the financial crisis that is plunging the nation into recession is former Texas senator Phil Gramm, McCain's own economic guru.
Gramm was always Wall Street's man in the Senate. As chairman of the Senate Banking Committee during the Clinton administration, he consistently underfunded the Securities and Exchange Commission and kept it from stopping accounting firms from auditing corporations with which they had conflicts of interest. Gramm's piece de resistance came on Dec. 15, 2000, when he slipped into an omnibus spending bill a provision called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (CFMA), which prohibited any governmental regulation of credit default swaps, those insurance policies covering losses on securities in the event they went belly up. As the housing bubble ballooned, the face value of those swaps rose to a tidy $62 trillion. And as the housing bubble burst, those swaps became a massive pile of worthless paper, because no government agency had required the banks to set aside money to back them up.
The CFMA also prohibited government regulation of the energy-trading market, which enabled Enron to nearly bankrupt the state of California before bankrupting itself.
The problem with this exercise, of course, is that Gramm's relationship to McCain is not comparable to the relationships that Ayers or Wright have with Obama. The idea that either Ayers or Wright would have any impact on the workings of an Obama administration is nonsensical. But Gramm and McCain do have an enduring political and economic alliance. McCain chaired Gramm's short-lived presidential campaign in 1996; Gramm is co-chair of McCain's current effort. McCain has not repudiated reports that Gramm is on the shortlist to become Treasury secretary if McCain is elected, even after Gramm labeled America "a nation of whiners."
If we are to believe his managers, McCain will charge into tomorrow night's debate seeking to "change the subject" from the economy to Obama's dangerous liaisons. It's not, however, likely to be a winning tactic. Obama will argue that in a time of deepening economic crisis, the public deserves a debate in which the candidates focus on their ideas for recovery rather than tendentious attacks on their rival's presumed associates. If pressed, though, he can mention that it is McCain's senior economic adviser who has diminished American solvency and power beyond the wildest dreams of anti-American terrorists.
The book "Left Behind" is simply fiction, were you aware of that? It is a work of fiction, it may be based on Biblical things, but its still fiction.
And just because Obama is a Democrat doesn't make him "the anti-Christ". Christian Republicans always say this about any Democratic candidate. Its getting old. Very old.
Pages